This population-based cohort study examines the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in South Carolina via aggregated pharmacy claims data matched with diagnosis codes from medical claims. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing decreased from 30.2% in 2012 to 22.6% in 2017 (P < 0.001) and was more common in adults >40 years old.

Background: Family medicine physicians are one of the leading prescribers of antimicrobials in both the inpatient and ambulatory setting, however appropriate education on antimicrobial stewardship (AS) is lacking. The Antimicrobial Stewardship Collaborative of South Carolina (ASC-SC) created a family medicine AS lecture series to increase awareness of stewardship, improve antimicrobial prescribing throughout the state, and ultimately combat antimicrobial resistance. Methods: All family medicine residency programs in South Carolina (n=17) were contacted to determine interest in a four 1-hour long lecture series regarding various AS topics provided by infectious diseases physicians and pharmacists. The introductory AS lecture included topics such as interpreting minimal inhibitory concentrations, utilizing antibiograms, guidelines for diagnosing and treating common infections, and antibiotic essentials. Lectures were given on-site, and eight identical pre- and post-lecture questions were asked to assess baseline knowledge and efficacy of the introductory lecture. Not all the attendees answered all the pre- and post-lecture questions. A Chi-square analysis was used to determine statistical significance. Results: To date, 7 family medicine residency programs were given the introductory antimicrobial stewardship lecture and were included in the total analysis. Respondents included 1st year (25 of 99 responses, 25%) and 2nd year family medicine residents (17 of 99 responses 17%). When asked “How familiar are you with the concept of antimicrobial stewardship?”, 43 of 106 (41%) respondents were at least familiar or very familiar prior to the lecture compared to 81 of 93 (87%) after the lecture (p < 0.001). When asked “How confident are you in using antibiograms for antimicrobial decisions?”, 41 of 107 (38%) were confident or very confident pre-lecture and 83 of 101 (82%) post-lecture (p < 0.001). When given a case-based question on using an antibiogram to determine an appropriate empiric agent for inpatient pyelonephritis, 59 of 107 (55%) respondents were able to answer the question correctly pre-lecture compared to 85 of 99 (86%) post-lecture (p < 0.001). Among those who answered the question incorrectly, 60% selected the agent with the highest percentage susceptible rate in the antibiogram, despite it being an inappropriate agent for pyelonephritis. Conclusion: The ASC-SC lecture series was an effective tool to increase awareness and knowledge of antimicrobial stewardship to family medicine providers. This lecture series survey data helps determine what family medicine residents commonly misunderstood in AS concepts and helps guide future initiatives.

Background: The standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR) is a metric utilized to measure antimicrobial use within and between hospitals by comparing observed to predicted antimicrobial days of therapy. However, it remains unknown whether narrow-spectrum beta-lactam (NSBL) use adds to overall antimicrobial utilization or substitutes broad-spectrum agents. This muti-hospital cohort study examined the impact of NSBL use on overall antimicrobial utilization and the correlation between the use of NSBL and various broad-spectrum antimicrobial categories in South Carolina (SC) hospitals. Methods: SAARs were collected from all hospitals in SC that reported antimicrobial use (AU) data to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) between 2017 and 2021. SAARs collected included: overall SAAR, broad-spectrum agents predominantly used for hospital-onset infections (BSHO), broad-spectrum agents predominantly used for community-acquired infections (BSCA), NSBL, and antibacterial agents posing the highest risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Category SAARs were combined to include data in both the adult intensive care unit (ICU) and adult wards using the formula: [(total observed antimicrobial days ICU + total observed antimicrobial days ward) / (total predicted antimicrobial days ICU + total predicted antimicrobial days wards)]. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to examine the correlation between various SAARs categories. Results: A total of 38 hospitals in South Carolina reported AU to NHSN at least during one calendar year during the study period. The use of NSBL agents was negatively correlated with the use of BSHO (r = -0.596, p < 0.001), BSCA (r = -0.543, p < 0.001), and high-risk CDI antibiotics (r = -0.601, p < 0.001). Moreover, the use of NSBL agents did not correlate with the overall SAAR (r = 0.008, p = 0.93), whereas the use of BSHO (r = 0.587, p < 0.001), BSCA (r = 0.494, p < 0.001), and high-risk CDI agents (r = 0.464; p < 0.001) positively correlated with the overall SAAR. Conclusion: In South Carolina hospitals, the use of NSBLs does not contribute to additional antibiotic use overall as it seems to replace broad-spectrum antimicrobials in various categories. By de-escalating from broad-spectrum agents to NSBL agents, one can improve antimicrobial use without negatively impacting the overall SAAR. This observation encourages implementation of antimicrobial stewardship interventions that increase utilization of NSBLs, when appropriate, such as de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy among others without concerns for increasing the SAAR for overall antibiotic use.

The escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) necessitates impactful, reproducible, and scalable antimicrobial stewardship strategies. This review addresses the critical need to enhance the quality of antimicrobial stewardship intervention research. We propose five considerations for authors planning and evaluating antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Antimicrobial stewards should consider the following mnemonic ABCDE: (A) plan Ahead using implementation science; (B) Be clear and thoroughly describe the intervention by using the TidIER checklist; (C) Use a Checklist to comprehensively report study components; (D) Select a study Design carefully; and (E) Assess Effectiveness and implementation by selecting meaningful outcomes. Incorporating these recommendations will help strengthen the evidence base of antimicrobial stewardship literature and support optimal implementation of strategies to mitigate AMR.

In an identified quality improvement effort, nurses were observed regarding their workflow while in contact precaution rooms. Multiple opportunities for hand hygiene were missed while nurses were in gloves, predominantly while moving between “dirty” and “clean” tasks. An education initiative afterward did not show improvement in hand hygiene rates.

One fundamental strategy to address the public health threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is improved awareness among the public, prescribers, and policy makers with the aim of engaging these groups to act. World Antimicrobial Awareness Week is an opportunity for concerted and consistent communication regarding practical strategies to prevent and mitigate AMR. We highlight 10 ways for antimicrobial stewards to make the most of World Antimicrobial Awareness Week.

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Collaborative of South Carolina created quarterly Comparative SAAR Analysis Reports based on standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR) data from the NHSN Antimicrobial Use (AU) Option. These reports provide SAAR histograms and site-specific feedback to participating facilities in South Carolina. They were created to improve antimicrobial use throughout the state, especially in rural regions.

In May of 2018, PulseNet, the national molecular subtyping network for enteric pathogens, detected a multistate cluster of illnesses caused by an uncommon molecular subtype of Salmonella serovar Mbandaka. A case was defined as an illness in a person infected with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Mbandaka with illness onset on or after 3 March 2018 and before 1 September 2018. One-hundred thirty-six cases from 36 states were identified; 35 hospitalisations and no deaths were reported. Ill people ranged in age from <1 year to 95 years (median: 57 years). When standardised questionnaires did not generate a strong hypothesis, opened-ended interviews were performed. Sixty-three of 84 (75%) ultimately reported consuming or possibly consuming a specific sweetened puffed wheat cereal in the week before illness onset. Environmental sampling performed at the cereal manufacturing facility yielded the outbreak strain. The outbreak strain was also isolated from open cereal samples from ill people's homes and from a sealed retail sample. Due to these findings, the brand owner of the product issued a voluntary recall of the cereal on 14 June 2018. Additional investigation of the manufacturing facility identified persistent environmental contamination with Salmonella Mbandaka that was closely genetically related to other isolates in the outbreak. This investigation highlights the ability of Salmonella to survive in low-moisture environments, and the potential for prolonged outbreaks linked to products with long shelf lives and large distribution areas.

The use of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (EHHMS) decreased due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We analyzed dispenser use, hand hygiene (HH) badge use, and HH compliance to determine the effect of COVID-19 on EHHMS use and HH compliance. HH product shortages and other pandemic-induced challenges influenced EHHMS use.

Background: Central-line–associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) are linked with significant morbidity and mortality. A NHSN laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBSI) has specific criteria to ascribe an infection to the central line or not. The criteria used to associate the pathogen to another site are restrictive. This objective to better classify CLABSIs using enhanced criteria to gain a comprehensive understanding of the error so that appropriate reduction efforts are utilized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records with NHSN-identified CLABSI from July 2017 to December 2018 at 2 geographically proximate hospitals. Trained infectious diseases personnel from tertiary-care academic medical centers, the University of Virginia Health System, a 600-bed medical center in Charlottesville, Virginia, and Virginia Commonwealth University Health System with 865 beds in Richmond, Virginia, reviewed charts. We defined “overcaptured” or O-CLABSI into different categories: O-CLABSI-1 is bacteremia attributable to a primary infectious source; O-CLABSI-2 is bacteremia attributable to neutropenia with gastrointestinal translocation not meeting mucosal barrier injury criteria; O-CLABSI-3 is a positive blood culture attributable to a contaminant; and O-CLABSI-4 is a patient injecting line, though not officially documented. Descriptive analyses were performed using the χ2 and the Fisher exact tests. Results: We found a large number of O-CLABSIs on chart review (79 of 192, 41%). Overall, 56 of 192 (29%) LCBSIs were attributable to a primary infectious source not meeting NHSN definition. O-CLABSI proportions between the 2 hospitals were statistically different; hospital A identified 34 of 59 (58%) of their NHSN-identified CLABSIs as O-CLABSIs, and hospital B identified a 45 of 133 (34%) as O-CLABSIs (P = .0020) (Table 1). When comparing O-CLABSI types, hospital B had a higher percentage of O-CLABSI-1 compared to hospital B: 76% versus 64%. Hospital A had a higher proportion of O-CLABSI-2: 21 versus 7%. Hospitals A and B had similar proportion of O-CLABSI-3: 15% versus 18%. These values were all statistically significant (P < .0001). Discussions: The results of these 2 geographically proximate systems indicate that O-CLABSIs are common. Attribution can vary significantly between institutions, likely depending on differences in incidence of true CLABSI, patient populations, protocols, and protocol compliance. These findings have implications for interfacility comparisons of publicly reported data. Most importantly, erroneous attribution can result in missed opportunity to direct patient safety efforts to the root cause of the bacteremia and could lead to inappropriate treatment.

Funding: None

Disclosures: Michelle Doll, Research Grant from Molnlycke Healthcare