Background: Patients undergoing hemodialysis are at high risk for healthcare-associated infections; they are at 100 times the risk of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSI) compared with U.S. adults not on hemodialysis. Prior studies found that nasal decolonization with mupirocin prevented S. aureus BSI among hemodialysis patients. We implemented a nasal decolonization intervention in which patients self-administered povidone-iodine (PVI) at each dialysis session. We aimed to assess: 1) hemodialysis patients’ knowledge of their infection risk and their willingness to take an active role in infection prevention; 2) the acceptability of the PVI nasal decolonization intervention. Methods: We performed a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial at 16 outpatient hemodialysis centers. Patients were surveyed: before starting PVI, 1 month after their center started using PVI, and ~6 months after starting PVI. We used a chi-square test to compare results. Results: 469 patients completed at least 1 survey: 400 pre-intervention, 237 at 1 month and 201 at 6 months. Overall, 56% of patients thought that their risk of infection was average or below average compared with an average person in the U.S. (Figure). Over 98% agreed with the statement “One of the most important things I can do for my health is to take an active role in my health care." In the pre-intervention survey, 73% were willing to do “a lot of effort” to prevent an infection. This proportion was similar (73%) in the 2nd survey, but decreased to 63% in the final survey (p < 0 .01). Among 106 patients who reported starting PVI, 85% reported that PVI felt neutral or pleasant, 9.4% reported a side effect, and 79% reported using it during the past 3 dialysis sessions. Among 102 patients who reported using PVI at 6 months, 87% said it felt neutral/pleasant, 3.9% reported a side effect and 75% reported using it during the past 3 dialysis sessions. Side effects included nasal dripping, congestion or burning/stinging, unpleasant smell, headache, yellow tears, and minor nose bleeding. Conclusions: Hemodialysis patients are not aware of their high risk of infection. Although many were willing to expend a lot of effort to prevent an infection, this willingness decreased during an infection prevention intervention. There were few PVI side effects and most patients stated that PVI felt neutral/pleasant, yet many patients chose to not use PVI. Future research should aim to improve patient education on their risk of infection and assess barriers to adherence with infection prevention interventions.

Disclosure: Marin Schweizer: Speaker- 3M; Contracted research-3M; Anitha Vijayan: Honoraria - Quanta, Baxter, Fresenius Consulting, Astute, NxStage

Background: Early postoperative and acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) may be managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). Among patients with nonstaphylococcal PJI, an initial 4–6-week course of intravenous or highly bioavailable oral antibiotics is recommended in the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines, with disagreement among committee members on the need for subsequent chronic oral antimicrobial suppression (CAS). We aimed to characterize patients with nonstaphylococcal PJI who received CAS and to compare them to those who did not receive CAS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to Veterans’ Affairs (VA) hospitals from 2003 to 2017 who had a PJI caused by nonstaphylococcal bacteria, underwent DAIR, and received 4–6 weeks of antimicrobial treatment. PJI was defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2011 criteria. CAS was defined as at least 6 months of oral antibiotics following initial treatment of the PJI. Patients were followed for 5 years after debridement. We used χ2 tests and t tests were used to compare patients who received CAS with those who did not receive CAS. Results: Overall, 561 patients had a nonstaphylococcal PJI treated with DAIR, and 80.6% of patients received CAS. The most common organisms causing PJI were streptococci. We detected no significant differences between patients who received CAS and those who did not receive CAS, except that modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (mAPACHE) scores were higher among patients who did not receive CAS (Table 1). Conclusion: Patients not on CAS were more severely ill (by mAPACHE) than those on CAS. Otherwise, the 2 groups were not different. This finding was contrary to our hypothesis that patients with multiple comorbidities or higher mAPACHE scores would be more likely to get CAS. A future analysis will be conducted to assess treatment failure in both groups. We hope to find a specific cohort who may benefit from CAS and hope to deimplement CAS in others who may not benefit from it.

Funding: No

Disclosures: None

Table 1.

Background: Daptomycin is considered an effective alternative to vancomycin in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (MRSA BSI). Objective: We investigated the real-world effectiveness of recommended daptomycin doses compared with vancomycin. Methods: This nationwide retrospective cohort study included patients from 124 Veterans’ Affairs hospitals who had a MRSA BSI and were initially treated with vancomycin during 2007–2014. Patients were categorized into 3 groups by daptomycin dose calculated using adjusted body weight: low (>6 mg/kg/day), standard (6–8 mg/kg/day), and high (≥8 mg/kg/day). International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes were used to identify other prior or concurrent infections and comorbidities. Multivariate cox regression was used to compare 30-day all-cause mortality as the primary outcome comparing patients on either low-dose, standard-dose, or high-dose daptomycin with vancomycin. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results: Of the 7,518 patients in the cohort, 683 (9.1%) were switched to daptomycin after initial treatment with vancomycin for their MRSA BSI episode. A low dose of daptyomycin was administered to 181 patients (26.5%), a standard dose was given to 377 patients (55.2%), and a high dose was administered to 125 patients (18.3%). Dose groups differed significantly in body mass index (BMI), presence of an osteomyelitis diagnosis, and diagnosis of diabetes. Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower in daptomycin patients than in those given vancomycin (11.3% vs 17.6%; P < .0001). Treatment with daptomycin was associated with improved 30-day survival compared with vancomycin (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.84), after adjusting for age, BMI, diagnosis of endovascular infection, skin and soft-tissue infection and osteomyelitis, hospitalization in the prior year, immunosuppression, diagnosis of diabetes, and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Treatment with a standard dose of daptomycin was associated with lower mortality compared with vancomycin (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46–0.86). High and low daptomycin dose groups had a trend toward improved 30-day survival compared with vancomycin (Fig. 1). In 2 separate sensitivity analyses excluding vancomycin patients, there was no difference in 30-day mortality between a standard dose and a high dose (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.51–1.97). However, we detected a trend toward poor survival with a low dose compared with a standard dose (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.73–2.02). Conclusions: A standard dose of daptomycin was significantly associated with lower 30-day mortality compared with continued vancomycin treatment. Accurate dosage of daptomycin and avoidance of low-dose daptomycin should be a part of good antibiotic stewardship practice.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Studies of interventions to decrease rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) must include thousands of patients to be statistically powered to demonstrate a significant reduction. Therefore, it is important to develop methodology to extract data available in the electronic medical record (EMR) to accurately measure SSI rates. Prior studies have created tools that optimize sensitivity to prioritize chart review for infection control purposes. However, for research studies, positive predictive value (PPV) with reasonable sensitivity is preferred to limit the impact of false-positive results on the assessment of intervention effectiveness. Using information from the prior tools, we aimed to determine whether an algorithm using data available in the Veterans Affairs (VA) EMR could accurately and efficiently identify deep incisional or organ-space SSIs found in the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) data set for cardiac and orthopedic surgery patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent cardiac surgery or total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at 11 VA hospitals between January 1, 2007, and April 30, 2017. We used EMR data that were recorded in the 30 days after surgery on inflammatory markers; microbiology; antibiotics prescribed after surgery; International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for reoperation for an infection related purpose; and ICD codes for mediastinitis, prosthetic joint infection, and other SSIs. These metrics were used in an algorithm to determine whether a patient had a deep or organ-space SSI. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for accuracy of the algorithm through comparison with 30-day SSI outcomes collected by nurse chart review in the VASQIP data set. Results: Among the 11 VA hospitals, there were 18,224 cardiac surgeries and 16,592 TJA during the study period. Of these, 20,043 were evaluated by VASQIP nurses and were included in our final cohort. Of the 8,803 cardiac surgeries included, manual review identified 44 (0.50%) mediastinitis cases. Of the 11,240 TJAs, manual review identified 71 (0.63%) deep or organ-space SSIs. Our algorithm identified 32 of the mediastinitis cases (73%) and 58 of the deep or organ-space SSI cases (82%). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV are shown in Table 1. Of the patients that our algorithm identified as having a deep or organ-space SSI, only 21% (PPV) actually had an SSI after cardiac surgery or TJA. Conclusions: Use of the algorithm can identify most complex SSIs (73%–82%), but other data are necessary to separate false-positive from true-positive cases and to improve the efficiency of case detection to support research questions.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Enhanced terminal room cleaning with ultraviolet C (UVC) disinfection has become more commonly used as a strategy to reduce the transmission of important nosocomial pathogens, including Clostridioides difficile, but the real-world effectiveness remains unclear. Objectives: We aimed to assess the association of UVC disinfection during terminal cleaning with the incidence of healthcare-associated C. difficile infection and positive test results for C. difficile within the nationwide Veterans Health Administration (VHA) System. Methods: Using a nationwide survey of VHA system acute-care hospitals, information on UV-C system utilization and date of implementation was obtained. Hospital-level incidence rates of clinically confirmed hospital-onset C. difficile infection (HO-CDI) and positive test results with recent healthcare exposures (both hospital-onset [HO-LabID] and community-onset healthcare-associated [CO-HA-LabID]) at acute-care units between January 2010 and December 2018 were obtained through routine surveillance with bed days of care (BDOC) as the denominator. We analyzed the association of UVC disinfection with incidence rates of HO-CDI, HO-Lab-ID, and CO-HA-LabID using a nonrandomized, stepped-wedge design, using negative binomial regression model with hospital-specific random intercept, the presence or absence of UVC disinfection use for each month, with baseline trend and seasonality as explanatory variables. Results: Among 143 VHA acute-care hospitals, 129 hospitals (90.2%) responded to the survey and were included in the analysis. UVC use was reported from 42 hospitals with various implementation start dates (range, June 2010 through June 2017). We identified 23,021 positive C. difficile test results (HO-Lab ID: 5,014) with 16,213 HO-CDI and 24,083,252 BDOC from the 129 hospitals during the study period. There were declining baseline trends nationwide (mean, −0.6% per month) for HO-CDI. The use of UV-C had no statistically significant association with incidence rates of HO-CDI (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.032; 95% CI, 0.963–1.106; P = .65) or incidence rates of healthcare-associated positive C. difficile test results (HO-Lab). Conclusions: In this large quasi-experimental analysis within the VHA System, the enhanced terminal room cleaning with UVC disinfection was not associated with the change in incidence rates of clinically confirmed hospital-onset CDI or positive test results with recent healthcare exposure. Further research is needed to understand reasons for lack of effectiveness, such as understanding barriers to utilization.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

We evaluated the relationship between local MRSA prevalence rates and antibiotic use across 122 VHA hospitals in 2016. Higher hospital-level MRSA prevalence was associated with significantly higher rates of antibiotic use, even after adjusting for case mix and stewardship strategies. Benchmarking anti-MRSA antibiotic use may need to adjust for MRSA prevalence.