We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
As a domain of academic enterprise, applied linguistics has had more than its fair share of “approaches”. Each new approach is presented as “the” solution to some major problem encountered in its practice; each approach promises to shore up its theoretical foundations. But the remark that Harold E. Palmer, one of the earliest pioneers in the field, made nearly a century ago still appears apposite: “Evidence of various kinds shows that this subject has not attained the scientific stage, but is so far in the experimental or empirical stage” (Palmer 1917: 1). To remedy the situation, he recommended greater focus on language, believing that inquiry into its nature “must necessarily be of interest to method-writers, to teachers, and to students” (Palmer 1917: 3); and a countless number of applied linguists have rightly embraced this view – we say “rightly” because it seems reasonable to hope that an understanding of what language is like would help in deciding what to do about teaching it efficiently. We grant also that when Palmer was expressing these views, our understanding of the true nature of language was not very deep. But if the strident claims made by today's dominant paradigms of linguistics are to be believed, by now the many marvellous “revolutions” in linguistics ought to have remedied this situation: We ought to have “the” true insights into the nature of language. Clearly this has not happened, for applied linguistics still continues in ferment.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.