We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Maintenance antipsychotic medication has a key role in the long term management of schizophrenia but in clinical practice its effectiveness is often reduced by poor adherence. Antipsychotic long acting injections (LAIs) can improve clinical outcomes in those who have adhered poorly with oral medication.
Aims and objectives
To compare patients’ attitudes, satisfaction and tolerability to their currently prescribed LAI, either a FGA-LAI or risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI), which was the only SGA-LAI at the time of this research.
Method
Cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of patients prescribed a FGA-LAI (n = 39) or RLAI (n = 28) for a minimum of 6 months. Assessments comprised drug attitude inventory (DAI-30), tolerability measured by Liverpool university neuroleptic side effect rating scale (LUNSERS) and satisfaction with antipsychotic medication by the SWAM scale.
Results
The DAI-30 score for patients on FGA depots was 16.18 and RLAI was 14.43, which indicated positive attitudes in both the groups. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.491). Further analysis, based on both the LUNSERS and SWAM scales, did not find any significant difference in tolerability and patient satisfaction.
Conclusions
There was no evidence of differences between FGA-LAIs and RLAI in terms of patient rated tolerability, attitudes and satisfaction. Both groups of patients had positive attitudes to their LAI and overall tolerability was good. This data is observational, and not from a randomised design, which may reflect selection bias. Randomised studies are needed to further investigate differences in tolerability and attitudes between specific LAIs.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.