Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services improve outcomes for young people, but approximately 30% disengage.

To test whether a new motivational engagement intervention would prolong engagement and whether it was cost-effective.

We conducted a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, cluster randomised controlled trial involving 20 EIP teams at five UK National Health Service (NHS) sites. Teams were randomised using permuted blocks stratified by NHS trust. Participants were all young people (aged 14–35 years) presenting with a first episode of psychosis between May 2019 and July 2020 (N = 1027). We compared the novel Early Youth Engagement (EYE-2) intervention plus standardised EIP (sEIP) with sEIP alone. The primary outcome was time to disengagement over 12–26 months. Economic outcomes were mental health costs, societal costs and socio-occupational outcomes over 12 months. Assessors were masked to treatment allocation for primary disengagement and cost-effectiveness outcomes. Analysis followed intention-to-treat principles. The trial was registered at ISRCTN51629746.

Disengagement was low at 15.9% overall in standardised stand-alone services. The adjusted hazard ratio for EYE-2 + sEIP (n = 652) versus sEIP alone (n = 375) was 1.07 (95% CI 0.76–1.49; P = 0.713). The health economic evaluation indicated lower mental healthcare costs linked to reductions in unplanned mental healthcare with no compromise of clinical outcomes, as well as some evidence for lower societal costs and more days in education, training, employment and stable accommodation in the EYE-2 group.

We found no evidence that EYE-2 increased time to disengagement, but there was some evidence for its cost-effectiveness. This is the largest study to date reporting positive engagement, health and cost outcomes in a total EIP population sample. Limitations included high loss to follow-up for secondary outcomes and low completion of societal and socio-occupational data. COVID-19 affected fidelity and implementation. Future engagement research should target engagement to those in greatest need, including in-patients and those with socio-occupational goals.

1. (1) The need to consider cultural influences to ensure relevance of interventions like cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) or family interventions (FI) in different countries.

2. (2) The need for cultural adaptation of interventions like CBT and FI in different countries to make them accessible and acceptable.

3. (3) When adapting therapy to a particular culture or country, recognizing the importance of engaging the local cultural population in the adaptation process.

Background: The impact of the pandemic and resultant restrictions on suicidal thoughts may vary across populations, geographical areas, between high and low socio-economic groups and vulnerable populations. Aim: To investigate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and resultant restrictions on suicidal thoughts in the United Kingdom.

The study group conducted a cross sectional survey using a questionnaire based on published approaches (Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, Impact of Events Scale-Revised) to understand the psychological impact of COVID-19 and the resultant restrictions on suicidal thoughts. The study was conducted in 3 phases to capture the different phases of the pandemic restrictions:

• Phase 1: 1st May 2020 to 31st July 2020

• Phase 2: 12th November 2020 to 12th February 2021

• Phase 3: 1st July 2021 to 30th September 2021

Analysis strategy: Descriptive analysis and logistic regression is applied in this study.

The study recruited 29133 participants in phase 1; 83851 participants in phase 2 and 75204 participants in phase 3. The largest age group of participants was 45–64 years. About two thirds of respondents were female. Majority of participants were of White British ethnicity. 31% participants in phase 1, 30% in phase 2 and 19% in phase 3 reported suicidal thoughts.

The preliminary regression analysis indicates that younger and male participants reported more suicidal thoughts among other findings which will be reported in the presentation.

Limitations: The non-probability sample design and time limited surveys meant that longitudinal changes were not possible to elicit.

There is mixed evidence on whether rates of suicidal thoughts increased during the pandemic. The results of this study will add to the evidence base and influence future pandemic planning and efforts to developing resilience and good mental health in society.

Antipsychotic medications such as risperidone, olanzapine and aripiprazole are used to treat psychological and behavioural symptoms among dementia patients. Current evidence indicate prescription rates for antipsychotics vary and wider consensus to evaluate clinical epidemiological outcomes is limited. This study aims to investigate the potential impact of atypical antipsychotics on the mortality of patients with dementia.

A retrospective clinical cohort study was developed to review United Kingdom Clinical Record Interactive Search system based data between January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017. A descriptive statistical method was used to analyse the data. Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were used to assess the severity and stage of disease progression. A study specific cox proportional hazards model was developed to evaluate the relationship between survival following diagnosis and other variables.

A total sample size of 1692 patients were identified using natural language processing of which, 587 were prescribed olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone (common group) whilst 893 (control group) were not prescribed any antipsychotics. Patients prescribed olanzapine and Risperidone showed similar risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08–1.60; P < 0.01], (HR = 1.35; 95%CI: 1.18–1.54; P < 0.001). Patients prescribed Quetiapine showed no significant association (HR = 1.09; 95%CI: 0.90–1.34; P = 0.38). Factors associated with a lower risk of death were elevated MMSE score at diagnosis (HR = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.62–0.83; P < 0.001) along with other demographic factors such as women (HR = 0.73; 95%CI: 0.64–0.82; P < 0.001) and being of a Caucasian British group (HR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.72–0.94; P < 0.01).

A significant mortality risk was identified among those prescribed olanzapine and risperidone which contradicts previous findings although the study designs used were different. Comprehensive research should be conducted to better assess clinical epidemiological outcomes associated with diagnosis and therapies to improve clinical management of these patients.

In the UK, postnatal depression is more common in British South Asian women than White Caucasion women. Cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) is recommended as a first-line treatment, but there is little evidence for the adaptation of CBT for postnatal depression to ensure its applicability to different ethnic groups.

To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a CBT-based positive health programme group intervention in British South Asian women with postnatal depression.

We have designed a multicentre, two-arm, partially nested, randomised controlled trial with 4- and 12-month follow-up, comparing a 12-session group CBT-based intervention (positive health programme) plus treatment as usual with treatment as usual alone, for British South Asian women with postnatal depression. Participants will be recruited from primary care and appropriate community venues in areas of high South Asian density across the UK. It has been estimated that randomising 720 participants (360 into each group) will be sufficient to detect a clinically important difference between a 55% recovery rate in the intervention group and a 40% recovery rate in the treatment-as-usual group. An economic analysis will estimate the cost-effectiveness of the positive health programme. A qualitative process evaluation will explore barriers and enablers to study participation and examine the acceptability and impact of the programme from the perspective of British South Asian women and other key stakeholders.

Treatment resistant depression (TRD) affects ≤20% of patients with major depressive disorder and is defined as failure to respond to ≥2 different antidepressants in the same major depressive episode (MDE). TRD patients’ outcomes are poor and real-world data from the UK are limited. The Treatment Resistant Depression in Europe Cohort was established to study patients being treated in local, routine clinical practice. The analysis presented here aimed to compare UK-specific data with data from other European countries included in the study.

A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of TRD patients in Italy, Germany, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, the UK and Belgium was conducted. Patients aged 18–74 years with current TRD, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥20, and initiating a new treatment for depression, were eligible. Data from medical records, clinician assessments and patient-reported questionnaires were collected over time, with follow-up of ≥6 months.

Data from 411 patients were analysed. At baseline, UK patients (n = 49) had similar depression severity to the whole European cohort (34.7% vs 32.6% of patients categorised as severe based on MADRS score, respectively). Patients had experienced the current MDE for a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 6.1 (7.9) years vs 2.6 (3.9) years and 14.3% vs 4.9% had experienced ≥5 treatment failures during this time in the UK and whole cohort, respectively. Total mean (SD) Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) scores of 24.5 (5.1) and 22.4 (5.5) were reported for the UK and whole cohort, respectively. Unemployment and long-term sick leave rates were 38.8% and 20.4% in the UK and 30.2% and 19.0% in the whole cohort, respectively. At 6 months, 8.9% of UK patients were in remission, and 82.2% had not responded to treatment, representing the lowest remission and highest non-response rates across all countries.

UK patients had been ill for longer and had more prior treatment failures than other countries in the study. They had high work and functional impairment, and the worst treatment outcomes of all the countries studied. UK TRD patients experience high disease burden; there is an unmet need for treatment strategies with better response rates.

We thank all participating patients. Study, and medical writing (Costello Medical, UK), funded by Janssen. AHY's independent research is funded by the National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), self-help and guided self-help interventions have been found to be efficacious and cost effective for victims of trauma, but there are limited data from low- and middle-income countries on culturally adapted interventions for trauma.

To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of culturally adapted trauma-focused CBT-based guided self-help (CatCBT GSH) for female victims of domestic violence in Pakistan.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruited 50 participants from shelter homes in Karachi and randomized them to two equal groups. The intervention group received GSH in nine sessions over 12 weeks. The control group was a waitlist control. The primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHO DAS 2). Assessments were carried out at baseline and at 12 weeks.

Out of 60 clients who met DSM-5 criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 56 (93.3%) agreed to participate in the study. Retention to the intervention group was excellent, with 92% (23/25) attending more than six sessions. Statistically significant differences were noted post-intervention in secondary outcomes in favour of the intervention.

A trial of CatCBT GSH was feasible and the intervention was acceptable to Pakistani women who had experienced domestic violence. Furthermore, it may be helpful in improving symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety and overall functioning in this population. The results provide a rationale for a larger, confirmatory RCT of CatCBT GSH.

1. (1) Current status of the practice and education of CBT in Egypt.

2. (2) Body of research conducted on CBT in Egypt.

3. (3) Needs and recommendations for further development of CBT provision in Egypt.

1. (1) To develop a dialogue and practice with confidence when addressing issues of self-disclosure with diverse populations.

2. (2) To appreciate the impact therapist self-disclosure has in early stages of engagement, in particular when working with patients from BME communities.

3. (3) To understand the impact and role of self-disclosure as initiated by patients.

4. (4) To increase therapist awareness on cultural differences in self-disclosure and develop ways to address this in therapy.

5. (5) To challenge therapists to adapt psychological therapies to diverse cultures and be cognisant that ‘one size does not fit all’.

After reading this article you will be able to:

• • recognise the link between cultural factors and the need to adapt psychosocial interventions

• • identify the necessary steps to culturally adapt CBT

• • understand the modifications required to deliver therapy to individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds.

Obesity is a major challenge for people with schizophrenia.

We assessed whether STEPWISE, a theory-based, group structured lifestyle education programme could support weight reduction in people with schizophrenia.

In this randomised controlled trial (study registration: ISRCTN19447796), we recruited adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis from ten mental health organisations in England. Participants were randomly allocated to the STEPWISE intervention or treatment as usual. The 12-month intervention comprised four 2.5 h weekly group sessions, followed by 2-weekly maintenance contact and group sessions at 4, 7 and 10 months. The primary outcome was weight change after 12 months. Key secondary outcomes included diet, physical activity, biomedical measures and patient-related outcome measures. Cost-effectiveness was assessed and a mixed-methods process evaluation was included.

Between 10 March 2015 and 31 March 2016, we recruited 414 people (intervention 208, usual care 206) with 341 (84.4%) participants completing the trial. At 12 months, weight reduction did not differ between groups (mean difference 0.0 kg, 95% CI −1.6 to 1.7, P = 0.963); physical activity, dietary intake and biochemical measures were unchanged. STEPWISE was well-received by participants and facilitators. The healthcare perspective incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £246 921 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Participants were successfully recruited and retained, indicating a strong interest in weight interventions; however, the STEPWISE intervention was neither clinically nor cost-effective. Further research is needed to determine how to manage overweight and obesity in people with schizophrenia.

R.I.G.H. received fees for lecturing, consultancy work and attendance at conferences from the following: Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Lundbeck, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Otsuka, Sanofi, Sunovion, Takeda, MSD. M.J.D. reports personal fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Servier, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc.; and, grants from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen. K.K. has received fees for consultancy and speaker for Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Servier and Merck Sharp & Dohme. He has received grants in support of investigator and investigator-initiated trials from Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck Sharp & Dohme. K.K. has received funds for research, honoraria for speaking at meetings and has served on advisory boards for Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novo Nordisk. D.Sh. is expert advisor to the NICE Centre for guidelines; board member of the National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH); clinical advisor (paid consultancy basis) to National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP); views are personal and not those of NICE, NCCMH or NCAP. J.P. received personal fees for involvement in the study from a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) grant. M.E.C. and Y.D. report grants from NIHR Health Technology Assessment, during the conduct of the study; and The Leicester Diabetes Centre, an organisation (employer) jointly hosted by an NHS Hospital Trust and the University of Leicester and who is holder (through the University of Leicester) of the copyright of the STEPWISE programme and of the DESMOND suite of programmes, training and intervention fidelity framework that were used in this study. S.R. has received honorarium from Lundbeck for lecturing. F.G. reports personal fees from Otsuka and Lundbeck, personal fees and non-financial support from Sunovion, outside the submitted work; and has a family member with professional links to Lilly and GSK, including shares. F.G. is in part funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care Funding scheme, by the Maudsley Charity and by the Stanley Medical Research Institute and is supported by the by the Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London.