We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Pelvic organ prolapse is a common gynaecological problem and often requires surgical management. It is therefore inevitable that vaginal prolapse will also be encountered in pregnancy. Antepartum prolapse is managed conservatively with pessaries and physiotherapy, though occasionally more active surgical intervention will be required. Intrapartum complications in women going into labour with a prolapse are uncommon, however may occur and the commonest problems encountered are cervical dystocia and cervical lacerations. Mode of delivery remains controversial. Women usually have a recurrence of prolapse post-natally and treatment needs to be tailored to patient preferences.
In this era of specialisation, obstetricians are becoming increasingly skilled at their jobs and deskilled in areas outside their expertise. In recent years, the education and training curricula for obstetrics and gynaecology has changed, with obstetricians expected to manage women with complex gynaecological problems encountered during pregnancy and the postnatal period competently, despite training and curricula not covering these problems in detail. Exploring common gynaecological problems such as ovarian cysts, management of vaginal prolapse and female genital mutilation, this practical book offers guidance for managing these conditions throughout the different stages of pregnancy and post-partum. Each chapter has a section on good governance, discussing salient points for clinical practice to improve patient safety and satisfaction, as well as reducing complaints and litigation. This hands-on book provides obstetricians around the globe with the evidence-based knowledge needed to deliver high quality care to pregnant women.
The claimant was 35 years old at the time of referral for stress urinary incontinence and the index surgery (in 1999). She had previously undergone a hysterectomy five years prior to the index event. Urodynamic studies confirmed mixed urinary incontinence and conservative treatment in the form of pelvic floor muscle training had failed to alleviate her symptoms. The patient was overweight with a BMI of 34. She was offered an open colposuspension which she agreed to. This case predates the synthetic midurethral slings when colposuspension was the standard surgical procedure offered for stress urinary incontinence. At the time of surgery, she suffered serious blood loss requiring embolisation of the internal iliac artery.
The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) defines an expert in general terms as a “person who has been instructed to give or prepare expert evidence for the purpose of proceedings”. A “single joint expert” is an expert instructed to prepare a report for the court on behalf of two or more of the parties (including the claimant) to the proceedings. When making decisions in negligence claims, the courts rely heavily on the advice and opinions of the experts, and in clinical negligence claims this is provided by clinicians. Experts should be used appropriately, and their duty is always to the court rather than as an advocate of either party. But as medicine is not an exact science, often there will be a difference of opinion even with the views of experts.