This study sought to assess undergraduate students’ knowledge and attitudes surrounding perceived self-efficacy and threats in various common emergencies in communities of higher education.

Self-reported perceptions of knowledge and skills, as well as attitudes and beliefs regarding education and training, obligation to respond, safety, psychological readiness, efficacy, personal preparedness, and willingness to respond were investigated through 3 representative scenarios via a web-based survey.

Among 970 respondents, approximately 60% reported their university had adequately prepared them for various emergencies while 84% reported the university should provide such training. Respondents with high self-efficacy were significantly more likely than those with low self-efficacy to be willing to respond in whatever capacity needed across all scenarios.

There is a gap between perceived student preparedness for emergencies and training received. Students with high self-efficacy were the most likely to be willing to respond, which may be useful for future training initiatives.

In response to the intricate challenges posed by high-cost, one-shot curative therapies, this study explores what hinders the wide implementation of innovative payment schemes across Europe. Drawing insights from the Belgian social healthcare system, this study focused on defining the necessary and sufficient conditions for implementing outcome-based spread payments in the context of market access to advanced medicinal products

Semi-structured interviews (n=33) were conducted with physicians (n=2), hospital pharmacists (n=4), hospital managers (n=2), patient representatives (n=3), industry representatives (n=5), Belgian policymakers (n=6), sickness fund representatives (n=4), legislative experts (n=2), and accounting experts (n=5) to elicit opinions and insights on stakeholders’ responsibilities and roles, and identify the necessary and sufficient conditions to establish outcome-based spread payments for the reimbursement of innovative therapies. The interviews took place between July 2020 and October 2020. The framework method analysis was performed using NVivo software (version 20.4.1.851). Statements were allocated into six main topics: payment structure, spread payments, outcome-based agreements, governance, transparency, and regulation.

Interviewees across stakeholder groups endorsed the idea of implementing outcome-based spread payments. However, opinions varied on practical and legal feasibility, especially regarding long-term follow-up for patients, data collection burden on physicians, and implications on the financing flow of health technology developers, hospitals, and the government. Concerns were also raised regarding the potential need for new governance structures, enhanced transparency on agreements and pricing mechanisms, as well as defining data requirements to address uncertainties often seen with this type of therapy. All interviewees emphasized the importance of increasing stakeholders’ understanding of these agreements to foster broader acceptance and successful implementation.

The effective implementation of outcome-based spread payments falls behind because consensus on how this reimbursement method can be a sustainable solution is missing. Leveraging the concepts of necessary and sufficient conditions from organizational research, this study provides guidance on resolving challenges and defines stakeholders’ roles for successfully implementing this reimbursement approach.

Black and Latino individuals are underrepresented in COVID-19 treatment and vaccine clinical trials, calling for an examination of factors that may predict willingness to participate in trials.

We administered the Common Survey 2.0 developed by the Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) Against COVID-19 Disparities to 600 Black and Latino adults in Baltimore City, Prince George’s County, Maryland, Montgomery County, Maryland, and Washington, DC, between October and December 2021. We examined the relationship between awareness of clinical trials, social determinants of health challenges, trust in COVID-19 clinical trial information sources, and willingness to participate in COVID-19 treatment and vaccine trials using multinomial regression analysis.

Approximately half of Black and Latino respondents were unwilling to participate in COVID-19 treatment or vaccine clinical trials. Results showed that increased trust in COVID-19 clinical trial information sources and trial awareness were associated with greater willingness to participate in COVID-19 treatment and vaccine trials among Black and Latino individuals. For Latino respondents, having recently experienced more challenges related to social determinants of health was associated with a decreased likelihood of willingness to participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials.

The willingness of Black and Latino adults to participate in COVID-19 treatment and vaccine clinical trials is influenced by trial awareness and trust in trial information sources. Ensuring the inclusion of these communities in clinical trials will require approaches that build greater awareness and trust.

Identify risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in pediatric intensive care settings in an era with high focus on prevention measures.

Matched, case–control study.

Quaternary children’s hospital.

Cases had a CLABSI during an intensive care unit (ICU) stay between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. Controls were matched 4:1 by ICU and admission date and did not develop a CLABSI.

Multivariable, mixed-effects logistic regression.

129 cases were matched to 516 controls. Central venous catheter (CVC) maintenance bundle compliance was >70%. Independent CLABSI risk factors included administration of continuous non-opioid sedative (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.96, 95% CI [1.16, 7.52], P = 0.023), number of days with one or more CVC in place (aOR 1.42 per 10 days [1.16, 1.74], P = 0.001), and the combination of a chronic CVC with administration of parenteral nutrition (aOR 4.82 [1.38, 16.9], P = 0.014). Variables independently associated with lower odds of CLABSI included CVC location in an upper extremity (aOR 0.16 [0.05, 0.55], P = 0.004); non-tunneled CVC (aOR 0.17 [0.04, 0.63], P = 0.008); presence of an endotracheal tube (aOR 0.21 [0.08, 0.6], P = 0.004), Foley catheter (aOR 0.3 [0.13, 0.68], P = 0.004); transport to radiology (aOR 0.31 [0.1, 0.94], P = 0.039); continuous neuromuscular blockade (aOR 0.29 [0.1, 0.86], P = 0.025); and administration of histamine H2 blocking medications (aOR 0.17 [0.06, 0.48], P = 0.001).

Pediatric intensive care patients with chronic CVCs receiving parenteral nutrition, those on non-opioid sedative infusions, and those with more central line days are at increased risk for CLABSI despite current prevention measures.

Neoclassical economics (NCE) theory and neoliberal economics practice together form one of the principal driving forces of environmental destruction and social injustice. We critically examine ten key hypotheses that form the foundations of NCE, and four other claims. Each fails to satisfy one or more of the basic requirements of scientific practice. Hence, NCE is fundamentally flawed, is irrational in the common meaning of the word, and should not be used as a guide for government policies. Because NCE is socially constructed, it can be replaced with an interdisciplinary conceptual framework that is compatible with ecological sustainability and social justice.

Neoclassical economics (NCE) is widely regarded as providing theoretical justification for neoliberal notions such as ‘governments should minimize regulation and spending, and hence leave major socioeconomic and environmental decisions to the market’. A large body of literature finds that NCE is largely responsible for environmental destruction and social inequality. As NCE is claimed to be a science and has appropriated terminology (without the content) from physics, we examine critically its basic hypotheses and four other claims from a viewpoint of natural scientists and an ecological economist, each a sustainability researcher. This paper defines NCE in two ways: as a theoretical structure for economics based on (1) the hypotheses of methodological individualism, methodological instrumentalism and methodological equilibration, and (2) the three hypotheses named above together with seven other common hypotheses of NCE. We find that each hypothesis and claim fails to satisfy one or more basic requirements of scientific practice such as empirical confirmation, underlying credible or empirical assumptions, consistency with Earth system science, and internal consistency. Sensitivity analysis is rare and ability to predict is lacking. Therefore, we recommend that neoclassical microeconomics be reformed and neoclassical macroeconomics be abandoned and replaced with a transdisciplinary field such as social ecological economics.

Conventional economics, a driver of environmental damage and social inequality, fails examination by sustainability scientists.

Knowledge of sex differences in risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can contribute to the development of refined preventive interventions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine if women and men differ in their vulnerability to risk factors for PTSD.

As part of the longitudinal AURORA study, 2924 patients seeking emergency department (ED) treatment in the acute aftermath of trauma provided self-report assessments of pre- peri- and post-traumatic risk factors, as well as 3-month PTSD severity. We systematically examined sex-dependent effects of 16 risk factors that have previously been hypothesized to show different associations with PTSD severity in women and men.

Women reported higher PTSD severity at 3-months post-trauma. Z-score comparisons indicated that for five of the 16 examined risk factors the association with 3-month PTSD severity was stronger in men than in women. In multivariable models, interaction effects with sex were observed for pre-traumatic anxiety symptoms, and acute dissociative symptoms; both showed stronger associations with PTSD in men than in women. Subgroup analyses suggested trauma type-conditional effects.

Our findings indicate mechanisms to which men might be particularly vulnerable, demonstrating that known PTSD risk factors might behave differently in women and men. Analyses did not identify any risk factors to which women were more vulnerable than men, pointing toward further mechanisms to explain women's higher PTSD risk. Our study illustrates the need for a more systematic examination of sex differences in contributors to PTSD severity after trauma, which may inform refined preventive interventions.

To investigate the source and transmission dynamics of an endoscope-associated New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumonia (NDM-KP) outbreak.

Epidemiological and genomic investigation.

Academic acute care hospital in New Jersey.

Five patients with active NDM-KP infection identified on clinical isolates, and four NDM-KP colonized patients identified via rectal swab screening.

Over a twelve-month period, nine patients were identified with NDM-KP infection or colonization. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that all of the identified cases were related by 25 mutational events or less. Seven of the cases were linked to gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (four clinical cases and three positive screens among patients exposed to endoscopes suspected of transmission). Two cases demonstrated delayed transmission that occurred five months after the initial outbreak, likely through shared usage of a non-therapeutic gastroscope without an elevator channel.

Although all endoscope cultures in our investigation were negative, the epidemiological link to gastrointestinal endoscopes, the high degree of relatedness via WGS, and the identification of asymptomatic NDM-KP colonization among patients exposed to shared endoscopes make the endoscopic mode of transmission most likely. This investigation highlights the probable transmission of NDM-KP via a gastroscope without an elevator channel, observed several months after an initial outbreak. We hypothesize that persistent mechanical defects may have contributed to the delayed device-related transmission of NDM-KP.

An accurate accounting of prior sport-related concussion (SRC) is critical to optimizing the clinical care of athletes with SRC. Yet, obtaining such a history via medical records or lifetime monitoring is often not feasible necessitating the use of self-report histories. The primary objective of the current project is to determine the degree to which athletes consistently report their SRC history on serial assessments throughout their collegiate athletic career.

Data were obtained from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium and included 1621 athletes (914 male) from a single Division 1 university who participated in athletics during the 2014-2017 academic years. From this initial cohort, 752 athletes completed a second-year assessment and 332 completed a third-year assessment. Yearly assessments included a brief self-report survey that queried SRC history of the previous year. Consistency of self-reported SRC history was defined as reporting the same number of SRC on subsequent yearly evaluation as had been reported the previous year.

For every year of participation, the number of SRC reported on the baseline exam (Reported) and the number of SRC recorded by athletes and medical staff during the ensuing season (Recorded) were tabulated. In a subsequent year, the expected number of SRC (Expected) was computed as the sum of Reported and Recorded. For participation years in which Expected could be computed, the reporting deviation (RepDev) gives the difference between the number of SRCs which were expected to be reported at a baseline exam based on previous participation year data and the number of SRCs which was actually reported by the athlete or medical record during the baseline exam. The reporting deviation was computed only for those SRC that occurred while the participant was enrolled in the current study (RepDevSO). Oneway intraclass correlations (ICC) were computed between the expected and reported numbers of SRC.

341 athletes had a history of at least one SRC and 206 of those (60.4%) had a RepDev of 0. The overall ICC for RepDev was 0.761 (95% CI 0.73-0.79). The presence of depression (ICC 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.92) and loss of consciousness (ICC 0.80, 95% CI 0.720.86) were associated with higher ICCs compared to athletes without these variables. Female athletes demonstrated higher self-report consistency (ICC 0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.85) compared to male athletes (ICC 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.76). Differences in the classification of RepDev according to sex and sport were found to be significant (x2=77.6, df=56, p=0.03). The sports with the highest consistency were Women’s Tennis, Men’s Diving, and Men’s Tennis with 100% consistency between academic years. Sports with the lowest consistency were Women’s Gymnastics (69%), Men’s Lacrosse (70%), and Football (72%). 96 athletes had at least one study-only SRC in the previous year and 69 of those (71.9%) had a RepDevSO of 0 (ICC 0.673, 95% CI 0.64-0.71).

Approximately 40% of athletes do not consistently report their SRC history, potentially further complicating the clinical management of SRC. These findings encourage clinicians to be aware of factors which could influence the reliability of self-reported SRC history.

We identify a set of essential recent advances in climate change research with high policy relevance, across natural and social sciences: (1) looming inevitability and implications of overshooting the 1.5°C warming limit, (2) urgent need for a rapid and managed fossil fuel phase-out, (3) challenges for scaling carbon dioxide removal, (4) uncertainties regarding the future contribution of natural carbon sinks, (5) intertwinedness of the crises of biodiversity loss and climate change, (6) compound events, (7) mountain glacier loss, (8) human immobility in the face of climate risks, (9) adaptation justice, and (10) just transitions in food systems.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Assessment Reports provides the scientific foundation for international climate negotiations and constitutes an unmatched resource for researchers. However, the assessment cycles take multiple years. As a contribution to cross- and interdisciplinary understanding of climate change across diverse research communities, we have streamlined an annual process to identify and synthesize significant research advances. We collected input from experts on various fields using an online questionnaire and prioritized a set of 10 key research insights with high policy relevance. This year, we focus on: (1) the looming overshoot of the 1.5°C warming limit, (2) the urgency of fossil fuel phase-out, (3) challenges to scale-up carbon dioxide removal, (4) uncertainties regarding future natural carbon sinks, (5) the need for joint governance of biodiversity loss and climate change, (6) advances in understanding compound events, (7) accelerated mountain glacier loss, (8) human immobility amidst climate risks, (9) adaptation justice, and (10) just transitions in food systems. We present a succinct account of these insights, reflect on their policy implications, and offer an integrated set of policy-relevant messages. This science synthesis and science communication effort is also the basis for a policy report contributing to elevate climate science every year in time for the United Nations Climate Change Conference.

We highlight recent and policy-relevant advances in climate change research – with input from more than 200 experts.