Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

44 results

Page 1 of 3

  • 1 - After Virtue and Virtue Ethics

  • from Part I - After Virtue and Ethical Theory
  • Edited by Tom Angier, University of Cape Town
  • Book:
    MacIntyre's <i>After Virtue</i> at 40
    Published online:
    12 October 2023
    Print publication:
    26 October 2023, pp 13-30

  • Summary

    This chapter makes the argument that After Virtue is not an exercise in virtue ethics, contra a common view. Rather, it subordinates virtue to other concepts, such as practice, tradition and narrative. These are in fact MacIntyre’s core concepts, and they provide a structure within which virtue finds its role.

MacIntyre's After Virtue at 40
  • Edited by Tom Angier
  • Published online:
    12 October 2023
    Print publication:
    26 October 2023
  • Since its publication in 1981, Alasdair MacIntyre's After Virtue has been recognised as a classic. Primarily a work of moral philosophy, it also draws on sociology, classics, political science and theology to effect a unique intellectual synthesis, and its combination of erudition and challenging, even provocative argument has made a significant impact throughout the humanities disciplines. This volume of new essays unpacks the influence of After Virtue on ethical and political theory, sociology and theology, and offers a multi-faceted exploration of its significance. The essays offer a way into MacIntyre's philosophy, and demonstrate how, rather than waning in influence over the past forty years, his most seminal text has found an ever-wider audience and continues to inspire controversy and debate in the humanities.

  • 8 - Ontological and Epistemological Foundations of Human Rights

  • from Part II - Natural Law Foundations of Human Rights Obligations
  • Edited by Tom Angier, University of Cape Town, Iain T. Benson, University of Notre Dame, Australia, Mark D. Retter, University of Cambridge
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Natural Law and Human Rights
    Published online:
    03 November 2022
    Print publication:
    17 November 2022, pp 119-132

  • Summary

    This chapter focuses on Maritain’s analysis of the ontological and epistemological foundations of human rights, and his wider hope for ‘practical agreement’ on the content of those rights. On the ontological front, I argue that such agreement is not forthcoming on the basis of natural teleology or eternal law. Neither of these secures assent across the world’s major religious or philosophical traditions. On the epistemological front, neither rationalism nor naturalism holds great promise. While Maritain upholds the naturalist alternative, his efforts devolve into a performative contradiction. For he hopes to rest agreement about human rights on ‘natural inclinations’, which, at the same time, he confines to the realm of the non-conceptual, non-rational and pre-conscious. This constitutes a markedly weak, even incoherent basis for agreement. The stage is set, therefore, for ‘new’ natural law theory, which proposes a non-ontological, purely rationalist foundation. I conclude that this too is an unpromising basis for agreement on rights. Instead, we need a new approach, one that privileges the deliverances of the social sciences and does not strive for universal consensus.

Page 1 of 3