Syllable structure in Piro, an Arawakan language spoken in Eastern
Peru,
exhibits properties that are of considerable interest. First, Piro allows
three-consonant clusters in the syllabic onset (Matteson 1965) but a
vowel-deletion rule is blocked to avoid such clusters, which makes it
difficult to simply attribute the blocking to well-formedness constraints
on
syllable structure (cf. Kisseberth 1970a, b). Second, the onset consonant
clusters are not governed by the Sonority Sequencing Principle (Selkirk
1984a, Clements 1990). The fact that all consonants except the prevocalic
ones are described by Matteson (1965) as syllabic seems to obviate the
need to posit complex onsets. However, these syllabic consonants do not
participate in any phonological rules, including word stress and phrase-level
rhythmic rules. If they are considered extrasyllabic throughout the
phonology, they become exceptions to our general conceptions of
extra-prosodicity, stray erasure and prosodic licensing (Itô 1986,
1989), since
numerous such extrasyllabic consonants are not at the peripheral position
of a well-defined domain but persist to be present throughout the
derivation. Third, loss of an onset or unsyllabified consonant can lead
to
compensatory lengthening (henceforth CL), contradicting the moraic
conservation account of CL (Hock 1986, Hayes 1989). Fourth, as Piro has
no underlying long segments nor evidence for a heavy closed syllable, it
becomes a counterexample to the typological prediction that CL occurs
only in languages that have a pre-existing vowel-length contrast (de Chene
& Anderson 1979) or syllable-weight contrast (Hayes 1989).