We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Strategies and strength of ijime (bullying) prevention in Japan have differed among prefectures and cities. The Japanese Government encouraged ijime-prevention after each media focus on ijime-suicide, however, the lack of specific Acts and strategies may have led to a failure to prevent subsequent tragedies. In recent years, various kinds of intervention programmes to tackle ijime and other problems in schools have been introduced, acculturated and evaluated in schools, supplying options for teachers. These are reviewed. It is argued that to avoid unwilling conflicts among those methods and overloading of teachers, a theoretical framework and system to organise the implementation would be necessary.
This final chapter reviews the contributions in the book and ventures some answers, albeit provisional, to the questions - How similar are the findings? What direct comparisons have been made across cultures? And what are the implications for intervention strategies? It first summarises some similarities in the phenomena as found in eastern and western cultures. It then explores the differences, including definitional issues and language terms; types of bullying, who bullies whom, and where bullying happens; prevalence rates and cross-national surveys; ratio of bullies to victims; coping strategies; and attitudes and awareness. A following section looks at how such cultural differences can be explained. Relevant considerations are linguistic issues and measurement issues; school system differences; societal factors of economic level and social inequality; and societal factors such as Hofstede and other dimensions. How these similarities/differences impact on intervention, and how they should, is considered. The study of bullying-like phenomena has become a truly international endeavour, but in the past has been rather dominated by western studies. This book has tried to redress this imbalance.
Individualism/collectivism (I/C) is widely used to explain cross-national differences in victimization. Most often I/C on the national level is used, without measuring it on the individual level. This is problematic, as people living in the same country might differ in levels of I/C. This chapter reviews measuring I/C in adolescents, and cross-cultural research on victimization and I/C. A study using Japanese and Austrian adolescents is reported; Austria represents an individualistic culture, Japan a collectivistic culture. The goals were to innovatively measure I/C and to examine whether individual variations of I/C predict level differences of relational and physical victimization similarly among Japanese and Austrian youth. Despite substantial individual variation in I/C, Japanese adolescents were more collectivistic than Austrian adolescents. Japanese youth reported lower levels of relational victimization than Austrian youth, but no differences were found for physical victimization. Both Japanese and Austrian adolescents perceived relational victimization as more group based compared with physical victimization. No associations between individual variations of I/C and victimization were found among Japanese adolescents, but higher levels of collectivism were associated with lower levels of both physical and relational victimization in Austria. Measuring I/C on the individual level is recommended in future studies.
as a physically harmful, emotionally hurtful and socially isolating experience. Research on Australia is considered first, covering traditional or offline bullying and findings from national studies, followed by research on cyberbullying. There is a discussion of research on school bullying and mental health in Australian schools. There follows a section on the nature of traditional bullying in New Zealand schools and then the nature of cyberbullying research on school policies on bullying is considered. Finally a brief comparison is made between the research situation on bullying in Australia, and New Zealand.
School bullying is widely recognized as an international problem, but publications have focussed on the Western tradition of research. A long tradition of research in Japan and South Korea, and more recently in mainland China and Hong Kong, has had much less exposure. There are important and interesting differences in the nature of school bullying in Eastern and Western countries, as the first two parts of this book demonstrate. The third part examines possible reasons for these differences - methodological issues, school systems, societal values and linguistic issues. The final part looks at the implications for interventions to reduce school bullying and what we can learn from experiences in other countries. This is the first volume to bring together these perspectives on school bullying from a range of Eastern as well as Western countries.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.