2 results
The Early Chain of Care in Patients with Bacteraemia with the Emphasis on the Prehospital Setting
- Christer Axelsson, Johan Herlitz, Anders Karlsson, Henrik Sjöberg, Maria Jiménez-Herrera, Angela Bång, Anders Jonsson, Anders Bremer, Henrik Andersson, Martin Gellerstedt, Lars Ljungström
-
- Journal:
- Prehospital and Disaster Medicine / Volume 31 / Issue 3 / June 2016
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 30 March 2016, pp. 272-277
- Print publication:
- June 2016
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Purpose
There is a lack of knowledge about the early phase of severe infection. This report describes the early chain of care in bacteraemia as follows: (a) compare patients who were and were not transported by the Emergency Medical Services (EMS); (b) describe various aspects of the EMS chain; and (c) describe factors of importance for the delay to the start of intravenous antibiotics. It was hypothesized that, for patients with suspected sepsis judged by the EMS clinician, the delay until the onset of antibiotic treatment would be shorter.
Basic ProceduresAll patients in the Municipality of Gothenburg (Sweden) with a positive blood culture, when assessed at the Laboratory of Bacteriology in the Municipality of Gothenburg, from February 1 through April 30, 2012 took part in the survey.
Main Findings/ResultsIn all, 696 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 76 years and 52% were men. Of all patients, 308 (44%) had been in contact with the EMS and/or the emergency department (ED). Of these 308 patients, 232 (75%) were transported by the EMS and 188 (61%) had “true pathogens” in blood cultures. Patients who were transported by the EMS were older, included more men, and suffered from more severe symptoms and signs.
The EMS nurse suspected sepsis in only six percent of the cases. These patients had a delay from arrival at hospital until the start of antibiotics of one hour and 19 minutes versus three hours and 21 minutes among the remaining patients (P =.0006). The corresponding figures for cases with “true pathogens” were one hour and 19 minutes versus three hours and 15 minutes (P =.009).
ConclusionAmong patients with bacteraemia, 75% used the EMS, and these patients were older, included more men, and suffered from more severe symptoms and signs. The EMS nurse suspected sepsis in six percent of cases. Regardless of whether or not patients with true pathogens were isolated, a suspicion of sepsis by the EMS clinician at the scene was associated with a shorter delay to the start of antibiotic treatment.
,Axelsson C ,Herlitz J ,Karlsson A ,Sjöberg H ,Jiménez-Herrera M ,Bång A ,Jonsson A ,Bremer A ,Andersson H ,Gellerstedt M .Ljungström L The Early Chain of Care in Patients with Bacteraemia with the Emphasis on the Prehospital Setting . Prehosp Disaster Med.2016 ;31 (3 ):272 –277 .
A Description of the Prehospital Phase of Aortic Dissection in Terms of Early Suspicion and Treatment
- Christer Axelsson, Thomas Karlsson, Katarina Pande, Kristin Wigertz, Per Örtenwall, Joakim Nordanstig, Johan Herlitz
-
- Journal:
- Prehospital and Disaster Medicine / Volume 30 / Issue 2 / April 2015
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 February 2015, pp. 155-162
- Print publication:
- April 2015
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Purpose
Aortic dissection is difficult to detect in the early phase due to a variety of symptoms. This report describes the prehospital setting of aortic dissection in terms of symptoms, treatment, and suspicion by the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) staff.
Basic ProceduresAll patients in the Municipality of Gothenburg, Sweden, who, in 2010 and 2011, had a hospital discharge diagnosis of aortic dissection (international classification of disease (ICD) I 71,0) were included. The exclusion criteria were: age < 18 years of age and having a planned operation. This was a retrospective, descriptive study based on patient records. In the statistical analyses, Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for analyses of dichotomous and continuous/ordered variables.
Main findingsOf 92 patients, 78% were transported to the hospital by the EMS. The most common symptom was pain (94%). Pain was intensive or very intensive in 89% of patients, with no significant difference in relation to the use of the EMS. Only 47% of those using the EMS were given pain relief with narcotic analgesics. Only 12% were free from pain on admission to the hospital. A suspicion of aortic dissection was reported by the EMS staff in only 17% of cases. The most common preliminary diagnosis at the dispatch center (31%) and by EMS clinicians (52%) was chest pain or angina pectoris. In all, 79% of patients were discharged alive from the hospital (75% of those that used the EMS and 95% of those that did not).
ConclusionAmong patients who were hospitalized due to aortic dissection in Gothenburg, 78% used the EMS. Despite severe pain in the majority of patients, fewer than half received narcotic analgesics, and only 12% were free from pain on admission to the hospital. In fewer than one-in-five patients was a suspicion of aortic dissection reported by the EMS staff.
. ,Axelsson C ,Karlsson T ,Pande K ,Wigertz K ,Örtenwall P ,Nordanstig J .Herlitz J A Description of the Prehospital Phase of Aortic Dissection in Terms of Early Suspicion and Treatment . Prehosp Disaster Med.2015 ;30 (2 ):1 -8