Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:19:14.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of single layer centrifugation using Androcoll-E-Large on the sperm quality parameters of cooled-stored donkey semen doses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2013

I. Ortiz
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction Group, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
J. Dorado
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction Group, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
L. Ramírez
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction Group, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
J. M. Morrell
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7054, SE-75007, Uppsala, Sweden
D. Acha
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction Group, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
M. Urbano
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction Group, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
M. J. Gálvez
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction Group, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
J. J. Carrasco
Affiliation:
Equine Center for Assisted Reproduction Services, CENSYRA-Extremadura Government, 06007 Badajoz, Spain
V. Gómez-Arrones
Affiliation:
Equine Center for Assisted Reproduction Services, CENSYRA-Extremadura Government, 06007 Badajoz, Spain
R. Calero-Carretero
Affiliation:
Equine Center for Assisted Reproduction Services, CENSYRA-Extremadura Government, 06007 Badajoz, Spain
M. Hidalgo*
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction Group, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
*
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of single layer centrifugation (SLC) using Androcoll-E-Large on donkey sperm quality parameters after 24 h of cool-storage. Ejaculates were collected from Andalusian donkeys and then cooled at 5°C. SLC was carried out after 24 h of cool-storage using Androcoll-E-Large. In the first experiment, all sperm parameters assessed (total and progressive sperm motility, viability, sperm morphology and sperm kinematics VCL, VSL, VAP, LIN, STR, WOB, ALH and BCF) were statistically compared between semen samples processed or not with Androcoll-E-Large. Significant differences (P<0.05) were found between SLC-selected and unselected semen samples for all parameters assessed, obtaining better results after SLC. In the second experiment, semen samples were classified in two groups according to their sperm progressive motility (PM) before SLC. Then, the increments obtained in semen quality parameters after SLC were compared between groups. No significant differences were found between groups, indicating that SLC improved the sperm quality parameters of entire set of semen samples processed with independence to their original PM. In conclusion, SLC with Androcoll-E-Large can be used in donkeys, increasing the sperm quality of cooled-stored donkey semen doses after 24 h of cool storage.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergqvist, AS, Johannisson, A, Bäckgren, L, Dalin, AM, Rodriguez-Martinez, H and Morrell, JM 2011. Single layer centrifugation of stallion spermatozoa through Androcoll™-E does not adversely affect their capacitation-like status, as measured by CTC staining. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 46, 7478.Google Scholar
Chatdarong, K, Thuwanut, P and Morrell, JM 2010. Single-layer centrifugation through colloid selects improved quality of epididymal cat sperm. Theriogenology 73, 12841292.Google Scholar
Contri, A, De Amicis, I, Veronesi, MC, Faustini, M, Robbe, D and Carluccio, A 2010a. Efficiency of different extenders on cooled semen collected during long and short day length seasons in Martina Franca donkey. Animal Reproduction Science 120, 136141.Google Scholar
Contri, A, De Amicis, I, Veronesi, MC, Faustini, M, Robbe, D and Carluccio, A 2010b. Efficiency of different extenders on cooled semen collected during long and short day length seasons in Martina Franca donkey. Animal Reproduction Science 120, 136141.Google Scholar
Cortes-Gutierrez, EI, Crespo, F, Gosalvez, A, Davila-Rodriguez, MI, Lopez-Fernandez, C and Gosalvez, J 2008. DNA fragmentation in frozen sperm of Equus asinus: Zamorano-Leones, a breed at risk of extinction. Theriogenology 69, 10221032.Google Scholar
Heckenbichler, S, Deichsel, K, Peters, P and Aurich, C 2011. Quality and fertility of cooled-shipped stallion semen at the time of insemination. Theriogenology 75, 849856.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, M, Rodríguez, I and Dorado, J 2006. Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm class analyzer. Theriogenology 66, 9961003.Google Scholar
Hoogewijs, M, Morrell, J, Van Soom, A, Govaere, J, Johannisson, A, Piepers, S, De Schauwer, C, De Kruif, A and De Vliegher, S 2011. Sperm selection using single layer centrifugation prior to cryopreservation can increase thawed sperm quality in stallions. Equine Veterinary Journal 43, 3541.Google Scholar
Johannisson, A, Morrell, JM, Thorén, J, Jönsson, M, Dalin, AM and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2009. Colloidal centrifugation with Androcoll-E™ prolongs stallion sperm motility, viability and chromatin integrity. Animal Reproduction Science 116, 119128.Google Scholar
Love, CC 2011. Relationship between sperm motility, morphology and the fertility of stallions. Theriogenology 76, 547557.Google Scholar
Love, CC, Thompson, JA, Brinsko, SP, Rigby, SL, Blanchard, TL, Lowry, VK and Varner, DD 2003. Relationship between stallion sperm motility and viability as detected by two fluorescence staining techniques using flow cytometry. Theriogenology 60, 11271138.Google Scholar
Macias Garcia, B, Gonzalez Fernandez, L, Morrell, JM, Ortega Ferrusola, C, Tapia, JA, Rodriguez Martinez, H and Pena, FJ 2009aSingle-layer centrifugation through colloid positively modifies the sperm subpopulation structure of frozen-thawed stallion spermatozoa. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 44, 523526.Google Scholar
Macias Garcia, B, Morrell, JM, Ortega-Ferrusola, C, Gonzalez-Fernandez, L, Tapia, JA, Rodriguez-Martinez, H and Pena, FJ 2009b. Centrifugation on a single layer of colloid selects improved quality spermatozoa from frozen-thawed stallion semen. Animal Reproduction Science 114, 193202.Google Scholar
Mello, SLV, Henry, M, Souza, MC and Oliveira, SMP 2000. Effect of split ejaculation and seminal extenders on longevity of donkey semen preserved at 5°C. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia 52, 372378.Google Scholar
Miró, J, Taberner, E, Rivera, M, Peña, A, Medrano, A, Rigau, T and Peñalba, A 2009. Effects of dilution and centrifugation on the survival of spermatozoa and the structure of motile sperm cell subpopulations in refrigerated Catalonian donkey semen. Theriogenology 72, 10171022.Google Scholar
Morrell, J, Johannisson, A, Dalin, AM and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2009a. Morphology and chromatin integrity of stallion spermatozoa prepared by density gradient and single layer centrifugation through silica colloids. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 44, 512517.Google Scholar
Morrell, JM 2012. Stallion sperm selection: past, present, and future trends. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 32, 436440.Google Scholar
Morrell, JM, Dalin, AM and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2009b. Comparison of density gradient and single layer centrifugation of stallion spermatozoa: yield, motility and survival. Equine Veteterinary Journal 41, 5358.Google Scholar
Morrell, JM, Johannisson, A, Dalin, AM and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2009c. Single-layer centrifugation with Androcoll-E can be scaled up to allow large volumes of stallion ejaculate to be processed easily. Theriogenology 72, 879884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrell, JM, Johannisson, A, Strutz, H, Dalin, AM and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2009d. Colloidal centrifugation of stallion semen: changes in sperm motility, velocity, and chromatin integrity during storage. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 29, 2432.Google Scholar
Morrell, JM, Saravia, F, van Wienen, M, Wallgren, M and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2009e. Selection of boar spermatozoa using centrifugation on a glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane-coated silica colloid. Journal of Reproduction and Development 55, 547552.Google Scholar
Morrell, JM, Garcia, BM, Pena, FJ and Johannisson, A 2011a. Processing stored stallion semen doses by single layer centrifugation. Theriogenology 76, 14241432.Google Scholar
Morrell, JM, Mari, G, Kútvölgyi, G, Meurling, S, Mislei, B, Iacono, E and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2011b. Pregnancies following artificial insemination with spermatozoa from problem stallion ejaculates processed by single layer centrifugation with Androcoll-E. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 46, 642645.Google Scholar
Morrell, JM, Johannisson, A, Dalin, AM, Hammar, L, Sandebert, T and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2008. Sperm morphology and chromatin integrity in Swedish warmblood stallions and their relationship to pregnancy rates. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 50, 28.Google Scholar
Morrell, JM, Winblad, C, Georgakas, A, Stuhtmann, G, Humblot, P and Johannisson, A 2013. Reactive oxygen species in stallion semen can be affected by season and colloid centrifugation. Animal Reproduction Science 140, 6269.Google Scholar
Mortimer, ST 2000. CASA – practical aspects. Journal of Andrology 21, 515524.Google Scholar
Olds-Clarke, P 1989. Sperm from tw32/+ mice: capacitation is normal, but hyperactivation is premature and nonhyperactivated sperm are slow. Developmental Biology 131, 475482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortiz, I, Dorado, J, Morrell, JM, Acha, D, Ramírez, L, Urbano, M, Carrasco, JJ, Gómez-Arrones, V, Calero, R and Hidalgo, M 2012. Sperm motility differences between donkey cooled sperm processed by colloid centrifugation. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 32, 504505.Google Scholar
Peña, FJ, Ferrusola, CO, Tapia, JA and Aparicio, IM 2012. How Stallion sperm age in vitro? Scenario for preservation technologies. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 32, 451454.Google Scholar
Peña, FJ, Macías García, B, Samper, JC, Aparicio, IM, Tapia, JA and Ortega Ferrusola, C 2011. Dissecting the molecular damage to stallion spermatozoa: The way to improve current cryopreservation protocols? Theriogenology 76, 11771186.Google Scholar
Petrunkina, AM, Volker, G, Weitze, K-F, Beyerbach, M, Töpfer-Petersen, E and Waberski, D 2005. Detection of cooling-induced membrane changes in the response of boar sperm to capacitating conditions. Theriogenology 63, 22782299.Google Scholar
Rossel, S, Marshall, F, Peters, J, Pilgram, T, Adams, MD and O'Connor, D 2008. Domestication of the donkey: timing, processes, and indicators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 37153720.Google Scholar
Rota, A, Magelli, C, Panzani, D and Camillo, F 2008. Effect of extender, centrifugation and removal of seminal plasma on cooled-preserved Amiata donkey spermatozoa. Theriogenology 69, 176185.Google Scholar
Sieme, H, Harrison, RAP and Petrunkina, AM 2008. Cryobiological determinants of frozen semen quality, with special reference to stallion. Animal Reproduction Science 107, 276292.Google Scholar
Thys, M, Vandaele, L, Morrell, J, Mestach, J, Van Soom, A, Hoogewijs, M and Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2009. In vitro fertilizing capacity of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa selected by single-layer (Glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane) silane-coated silica colloidal centrifugation. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 44, 390394.Google Scholar
Varner, DD, Blanchard, TL, Meyers, PJ and Meyers, SA 1989. Fertilizing capacity of equine spermatozoa stored for 24 hours at 5 or 20°C. Theriogenology 32, 515525.Google Scholar
Vidament, M, Vincent, P, Martin, FX, Magistrini, M and Blesbois, E 2009. Differences in ability of jennies and mares to conceive with cooled and frozen semen containing glycerol or not. Animal Reproduction Science 112, 2235.Google Scholar
Watson, PF 2000. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Animal Reproduction Science 60–61, 481492.Google Scholar