Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:07:31.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MOTHERHOOD AND THE MORAL LOAD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2021

Get access

Abstract

Many of the decisions mothers face are morally intense. They're experienced as highly morally significant, and they are also often very morally complex, meaning that there aren't black-and-white, obvious answers to questions about what one morally may or must do. For example, I suggest that breastfeeding is complex in this way, despite a good deal of cultural pressure in favour of trying to do it. Acknowledging many of the decisions of motherhood as complex or as ‘grey areas’ is accurate, and also good for mums. But it also burdens mums with the responsibility of researching, discussing, thinking through, and ultimately making significant, complex moral decisions for themselves. I call this the moral load, taking inspiration from Emma's ‘mental load’. In the last section I consider what we could or should do to try to lessen the moral load as a burden on mums.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Academy of Pediatrics (2012) ‘Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk’, Pediatrics 129(3): e827e841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, L. F. (2019a) ‘Moral Reasons not to Breastfeed: A Response to Woollard and Porter’, Journal of Medical Ethics 45(3): 213–14.10.1136/medethics-2018-104989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emma, (2017) The Mental Load, trans. Dimitrijevic, U. (New York: Seven Stories Press).Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. (1991) ‘Virtue Theory and Abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 20(3): 223–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Komninou, S., Fallon, V., Halford, J. C. G., and Harrold, J. A. (2017) ‘Differences in the Emotional and Practical Experiences of Exclusively Breastfeeding and Combination Feeding Mothers’, Maternal & Child Nutrition 13(3): e12364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kukla, Q. R. (2008) ‘Measuring Mothering’, IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1(1): 6790.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. (1992) ‘Abortion and Embodiment’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70(2): 136–55.10.1080/00048409212345041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oster, E. (2015) ‘Everybody Calm Down about Breastfeeding’, <https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/everybody-calm-down-about-breastfeeding> [accessed 19 April 2020].+[accessed+19+April+2020].>Google Scholar
Skitolsky, L. (2012) ‘Tales from the Tit: The Moral and Political Implications of Useless Lactational Suffering’, in Lintott, S. and Sander-Staudt, M. (eds.), Philosophical Inquiries into Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Mothering (New York: Routledge, 2012), 6478.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. N., and Wallace, L. E. (2012) ‘For Shame: Feminism, Breastfeeding Advocacy, and Maternal Guilt’, Hypatia 27(1): 7698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woollard, F. (2018) ‘Motherhood and Mistakes about Defeasible Duties to Benefit’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97(1): 126–49.10.1111/phpr.12355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woollard, F., and Porter, L. (2017) ‘Breastfeeding and Defeasible Duties to Benefit’, Journal of Medical Ethics 43(8): 515–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed