Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:30:17.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6.5 - Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar by PCR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

J. E. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases
D. Britten
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases
D. W. Halton
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
J. M. Behnke
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
I. Marshall
Affiliation:
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Get access

Summary

Aims and objectives

This exercise aims to:

  1. Differentiate Entamoeba histolytica from E. dispar.

  2. Introduce students to PCR.

Introduction

Diagnosis of infectious diseases by the detection of nucleic acids specific for the infectious agent may offer considerable advantages over traditional laboratory diagnostic methods such as microscopy and culture. One such area where this may prove very useful is in the detection and differentiation of the two morphologically similar human parasitic amoebae, E. histolytica and E. dispar. Recent work has shown that E. histolytica, the causative organism of amoebic dysentery in humans, is in fact two separate species. Prior to this work it was thought that E. histolytica generally existed in humans without disease and, in about 10% of cases, gave rise to clinical disease. It has now been shown using a combination of methods (isoenzymes, biochemical, immunological and molecular) that infection with E. histolytica, sensu stricto, is likely to lead to disease whilst infection with E. dispar results in no symptoms.

The problem in trying to diagnose which of these two organisms is present in a patient is that both organisms are morphologically identical, both in the trophozoite stage and in the cystic form. This PCR (polymerase chain reaction) method uses two pairs of discrete primers that are able to recognise and differentiate the two species. PCR provides differential diagnosis of DNA extracted from faeces. The result is detected colorimetrically in a microtitre plate, which is simpler and safer than using radio-labelled probes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×