Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T13:23:00.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mapping the Scope of Dispute Settlement in Regional Trade Agreements: Implications for the Multilateral Governance of Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2016

MARC D. FROESE
MARC D. FROESE*
Affiliation:
International Studies Program Burman University
*
*Email: mfroese@burmanu.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the inclusion of provisions for the settlement of disputes in regional trade agreements enhances, rather than disrupts, the centrality of the World Trade Organization's dispute settlement system. Using a dataset that organizes exclusion clauses and special provisions for dispute settlement in regional trade agreements, the study develops a thematic typology that is used to examine the ways that disputes may be channelled between regional and multilateral dispute settlement institutions. This comparative empirical dimension offers a more accurate picture of the global contours of regionalization as they relate to the juridical aspects of trade governance, suggesting that the decentralization of dispute settlement inferred by the rapid development of regional bodies has been overstated.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 563 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © Marc D. Froese 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alavi, A. (2010), ‘Preferential Trade Agreements and the Law and Politics of GATT Article XXIV’, Beijing Law Review, 1(1): 7–13.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (2014), ‘Regionalism's Past, Present and Future’, in Deese, D. A. (ed.), Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 227–249.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. E. and Yotov, Y. V. (2011), Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, NBER Working Paper 17003, Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. (2011), 21st Century Regionalism: Filling the Gap between 21st Century Trade and 20th Century Trade Rules, WTO Staff Working Papers, Geneva: World Trade Organization, https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201108_e.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, J. (2010), ‘Fragmentation, Openness and Hegemony: Adjudication and the WTO’, in Lewis, M. K. and Frankel, S. (eds.), International Economic Law and National Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, W. (2005), Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy, New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. and Hannah, E. (2012), ‘The WTO and Institutional (In)Coherence in Global Economic Governance’, in Narlikar, A., Daunton, M., and Stern, R. M. (eds.), Handbook on the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (1998), A Stream of Windows: Unsettling Reflections on Trade, Immigration, and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (2008), Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Busch, M. L. (2007), ‘Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, Dispute Settlement in International Trade’, International Organization, 61(4): 735–761.Google Scholar
Chase, C., Yanovich, A., Crawford, J.-A., and Ugaz, P. (2013), Mapping Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements: Innovative or Variations on a Theme?, WTO Economic Research and Statistics Division, Staff Working Papers, World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Ciuriak, D., Lapham, B., Wolfe, R., Collins-Williams, T., and Curtis, J. (2015). ‘Firms in International Trade: Trade Policy Implications of the New New Trade Theory’, Global Policy, 6(2): 130–140.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.-A. and Fiorentino, R. V. (2005), The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements, WTO Discussion Papers, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
De Ville, F. and Siles-Brugge, G. (2014), ‘The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Role of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: An Exercise in “Managing Fictional Expectations”’, New Political Economy, 20(2).Google Scholar
Drahos, P. (2007), ‘Weaving Webs of Influence: The United States, Free Trade Agreements and Dispute Settlement’, Journal of World Trade, 41(1): 191–210.Google Scholar
Drahos, P. (2003), ‘When the Weak Bargain with the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization’, International Negotiation, 8: 9–109.Google Scholar
Drezner, D. W (2013), ‘The Tragedy of the Global Institutional Commons’, in Finnemore, M. and Goldstein, J. (eds.), Back to Basics: States Power in a Contemporary World, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elms, D. (2014), ‘Governing Trade: Regional Leadership in the Asia Pacific’, in Deese, D. A. (ed.), Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Fabbricotti, A. (2014), ‘Universalism and Regionalism in International Trade Law: Is the WTO a Truly Universal International Organization?’, in Marchisio, S., Gialdino, C. C., Cadin, R., and Manca, L. (eds.), Scritti in Memoria Di Maria Rita Saulle, Vol. I, Naples: Editoriale Scientifica.Google Scholar
Fabbricotti, A. (2008), ‘The Interplay Between the WTO and RTAs: Is it a Question of Interrelation Between Different Sources of International Law?’, Society of International Economic Law Online Proceedings Accessed 14 December, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1151386.Google Scholar
Fabbricotti, A. (2010), ‘The WTO and RTAs: A “Bottom-up” Interpretation of RTAs' Autonomy over WTO Law’, in Lewis, M. K. and Frankel, S. (eds.), International Economic Law and National Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Froese, M. D. (2014a), ‘Regional Trade Agreements and the Paradox of Dispute Settlement’, Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 11(3): 367–396.Google Scholar
Froese, M. D. (2014b), ‘Trade Policy Review and Dispute Settlement at the WTO’, in Deese, David A. (ed.), Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 349–397.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. L. and Posner, E. A. (2005) The Limits of International Law, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, F. (2012), ‘A Balancing Act: Using WTO Dispute Settlement to Resolve Regional Trade Agreement Disputes’, Trade, Law and Development, 4(2): 421–450.Google Scholar
Jones, E. (2014), ‘The WTO's Reform Crisis’, Project Syndicate, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/wto-reform-crisis-by-emily-jones-2014-10 (accessed 24 September 2015).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2011), The Politics of International Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F. (1991), Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kurihara, Y. (2011), ‘The Impact of Regional Trade Agreements on International Trade’, Modern Economy, 2(3): 846–849.Google Scholar
Liang, W. (2014), ‘Looking Back, Looking Forward: Multilateral and Regional Trade Governance’, in Deese, D. A. (ed.), Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 398–413.Google Scholar
Lynch, D. A. (2010), Trade and Globalization: An Introduction to Regional Trade Agreements, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Maggi, G. and Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2007), ‘A Political-Economy Theory of Trade Agreements’, American Economic Review, 97(4): 1374–1406.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. G. and Swagel, P. L. (2005), ‘Antidumping: The Third Rail of Trade Policy’, Foreign Affairs, 84(4): 107–119.Google Scholar
Marceau, G. (ed.) (2015), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Menon, J. (2009), ‘Dealing with the Proliferation of Bilateral Trade Agreements’, The World Economy, 32(10): 1381–1407.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. (2008), ‘New Trade Politics for the 21st Century’, Journal of International Economic Law, 11(3): 559–573.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1988), ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization, 42(3): 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G. C. (2009), ‘Developing Country Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Why it Matters, the Barriers Posed’, in Hartigan, J. (ed.), Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M. (2003), ‘A Global Community of Courts’, Harvard International Law Journal, 44(1): 191–219.Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. H. (2013), ‘International Trade Law as a Mechanism for State Transformation’, in Finnemore, M. and Goldstein, J. (eds.), Back to Basics: State Power in a Contemporary World, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, R. W. (2011), Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Summers, L. H. (1999), ‘Regionalism and the World Trading System’, in Bhagwati, J., Krishna, P., and Panagariya, A. (eds.), Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Agreements, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. (2013), The Future of International Law: Global Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viner, J. (1952), International Trade and Economic Development, Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Froese supplementary material

Froese supplementary material 1

Download Froese supplementary material(File)
File 60.9 KB