Enhanced recovery caused by nonlinear dynamics in the wake of a floating offshore wind turbine

Abstract An experimental study in a wind tunnel is presented to explore the wake of a floating wind turbine subjected to harmonic side-to-side and fore–aft motions under laminar inflow conditions. The wake recovery is analysed as a function of the frequency of motion $f_p$, expressed by the rotor-based Strouhal number, $St = f_p D / U_{\infty }$ ($D$ is the rotor diameter, $U_{\infty }$ the inflow wind speed). Our findings indicate that both directions of motion accelerate the transition to the far-wake compared with the fixed turbine. The experimental outcomes confirm the computational fluid dynamics results of Li et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 934, 2022, p. A29) showing that sideways motions lead to faster wake recovery, especially for $St \in [0.2, 0.6]$. Additionally, we find that fore–aft motions also lead to better recovery for $St \in [0.3, 0.9]$. The recovery is closely linked to nonlinear spatiotemporal dynamics found in the shear layer region of the wake. For both directions of motion and $St \in [0.2, 0.55]$, the noisy wake dynamics lock in to the frequency of the motion. In this synchronised-like state, sideways motions result in large coherent structures of meandering, and fore–aft movements induce coherent pulsing of the wake. For fore–aft motion and $St \in [0.55, 0.9]$, the wake shows a more complex quasiperiodic dynamic, namely, a self-generated meandering mode emerges, which interacts nonlinearly with the excitation frequency $St$, as evidenced by the occurrence of mixing components. The coherent structures grow nonlinearly, enhance wake mixing and accelerate the transition to the far-wake, which, once reached, exhibits universal behaviour.


Introduction
The worldwide installed capacity of offshore wind has been significantly growing since 2010.Most current offshore wind turbines are mounted on fixed structures and clustered in wind farms installed in water depths less than 60 m (Díaz & Soares 2020).For water depths greater than 60 m, a floating wind turbine is the preferred solution (Hannon et al. 2019).Compared with a fixed turbine, a floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) is free to move in its six degrees-of-freedom (DoF).The action of wind, waves and current is responsible for complex platform motions (Jonkman & Matha 2011).These motions depend, among others, on platform types, environmental conditions, moorings and water depth (Butterfield et al. 2007;Goupee et al. 2014).The effect of the motions on rotor aerodynamics is an active research topic that is becoming highly relevant.As turbines are usually installed in wind farm configurations, wake development is of particular interest, for example, for wind farm control strategies, power optimisations, etc.
Typical distances between offshore turbines within a farm in the main direction of the wind are in the range of 6 to 12D (with D the rotor diameter) (Hou et al. 2019).This implies that downstream turbines operate in the wake of upstream turbines.The wake of an offshore turbine is a high-turbulent and low-energy flow region compared with the undisturbed flow.There is thus much interest in understanding the evolution of the wake of a wind turbine and especially the features of the far-wake (typically for x/D ≥ 6).Over the past decades, several numerical studies, theoretical models, field measurements and wind tunnel experiments have been carried out, leading to significant progress in the rich subject of fixed wind turbine wakes, see for example Ainslie (1988), Vermeer, Sørensen & Crespo (2003), Chamorro & Porté-Agel (2009), Porté-Agel, Bastankhah & Shamsoddin (2020) and Neunaber et al. (2020).
(i) Wake regions of a fixed wind turbine.As the study of the wake of a FOWT assumes a good knowledge of the wake of a fixed wind turbine, we start with a discussion on this subject.The near-wake is located in the vicinity of the turbine (usually x < 4D), characterised by the presence of hub-, root-and tip-vortices (Vermeer et al. 2003;Neunaber et al. 2020).The flow in this region displays homogenous decaying turbulence.The coherent structures (tip-vortices, etc.) are carried downstream by the flow until instabilities occur, eventually leading to their destruction (Widnall 1972;Felli, Camussi & Di Felice 2011;Lignarolo et al. 2015).Among these, mutual inductance is of great importance, particularly for low-turbulence inflows; as they move downstream, helical vortices are affected by neighbouring vortices and interact with each other until they break up.For flows with high turbulence, mutual inductance may not be the main factor in the breakup of helical vortices (Hodgkin, Deskos & Laizet 2023).In the near-wake, it was shown by Lignarolo et al. (2015) that the tip-vortices shield the wake from the outer flow and prevent the exchange of momentum that provides re-energisation to the wake, as predicted by Medici (2005).The recovery process thus starts when the tip vortices become unstable, which marks the beginning of the transition region.From there, the shear layer (highly turbulent region), which separates the wake from the undisturbed flow, grows radially.Momentum is transported from the outer region to the wake, and turbulence builds up.Farther downstream, the shear layers merge at the centre.Here, the amount of turbulence in the wake is at its maximum and then gradually decreases as it moves downstream (similar to the behaviour of the wake of a fractal grid as shown by Hurst & Vassilicos (2007)).Around this position, the wind speed along the centre line begins to recover, indicating the start of the far-wake, which features a characteristic Gaussian wind deficit profile.The far-wake can be separated into a decay region and a fully developed far-wake when turbulence has reached a homogeneous-isotropic state (Pope 2000).The size of each region, the intensity of the recovery and the turbulence of the wake depend greatly on the type of inflow and the operating conditions of the turbine (Wu & Porté-Agel 2012;Iungo, Wu & Porté-Agel 2013;Neunaber et al. 2017;Gambuzza & Ganapathisubramani 2023).It is clear that the emergence of the far-wake is directly linked to the phenomena that happen closer to the rotor; however, in the far-wake, the detailed features of its turbulence appear to be universal (Ali et al. 2019).
(ii) Wake meandering of a fixed wind turbine.An important property of the wake of a wind turbine is its tendency to oscillate side-to-side and up and down, so-called wake meandering (Medici & Alfredsson 2006;Larsen et al. 2008;Howard et al. 2015).This phenomenon originates from two different causes.On the one hand, the turbulent flow of the atmosphere contains large eddies whose scale is larger than the wake width.These large eddies pass through the rotor and are responsible for the wake's low frequency and large amplitude oscillation (Larsen et al. 2008;Espana et al. 2011;Heisel, Hong & Guala 2018).
On the other hand, wake instabilities can cause meandering in the far-wake, where the wake tends to oscillate within a range of frequencies, expressed in terms of a meandering Strouhal number, St m = f m D/U ∞ ∈ [0.1, 0.5].This phenomenon is more likely to occur when the inflow's turbulence intensity is low, i.e.TI ∞ ≤ 0.05.Observations from various studies, such as Okulov et al. (2014), Foti, Yang & Sotiropoulos (2018), Heisel et al. (2018) and Gupta & Wan (2019), have revealed a broad peak in the spectrum around St m , indicating that wake oscillations differ from classical vortex shedding, which typically exhibits a sharp peak at the shedding frequency.It is, therefore, inappropriate to define a particular meandering frequency but rather a range of frequencies.After Gupta & Wan (2019), wake meandering occurs in the far wake due to the 'amplification of upstream disturbances by shear flow instabilities', a phenomenon also observed by Gambuzza & Ganapathisubramani (2023).Periodic excitation in the range of St m , where wake meandering naturally occurs, can lead to an early onset of meandering (Mao & Sørensen 2018;Gupta & Wan 2019;Hodgson, Madsen & Andersen 2023).Following this idea, some control strategies, such as the helix approach (a blade pitching control method), trigger instabilities that lead to the formation of large coherent structures in the wake (Frederik et al. 2020;Korb, Asmuth & Ivanell 2023).This strategy enables a faster transition to far-wake and a more efficient wake mixing, i.e. a faster wake recovery.
(iii) Wake of a floating wind turbine.The latest topic of floating wind turbines raises fundamental questions about the impact of rotor movements on the development of the wake.Another aspect not further discussed here is the impact on rotor aerodynamics.Firstly, the motions of a floating turbine are responsible for unsteady aerodynamic phenomena.Unsteadinesses are observed for high-frequency motions, characterised by the dimensionless Strouhal number, St = f p D/U ∞ (where f p is the frequency of motion, D is the rotor diameter and U ∞ is the inflow speed), typically for St > 0.5 (Sebastian & Lackner 2013;Farrugia, Sant & Micallef 2014;Sant et al. 2015;Bayati et al. 2017a;Fontanella et al. 2021).Secondly, the wake generated by a floating wind turbine is impacted by the different motions, which was shown through various wind tunnel studies with model turbines and porous disks (Rockel et al. 2014(Rockel et al. , 2017;;Bayati et al. 2017b;Fu et al. 2019;Kopperstad, Kumar & Shoele 2020;Schliffke, Aubrun & Conan 2020;Belvasi et al. 2022;Fontanella, Zasso & Belloli 2022;Meng et al. 2022).Bayati et al. (2017b) discussed the relevance of the so-called 'wake reduced velocity', equivalent to a Strouhal number, for characterising unsteady aerodynamic conditions.Fu et al. (2019) measured with particle image velocimetry the wake of a pitching and rolling model turbine with relatively high amplitudes (up to 20 • ) and low frequencies (St < 0.03).They observed a higher recovery for the floating turbine and enhanced turbulent kinetic energy, which Rockel et al. (2017) also observed.Schliffke et al. (2020) carried out a more systematic study in which they measured at 4.6D downstream the wake of a surging porous disc with St ∈ [0, 0.24] under realistic turbulent conditions.No impact of motions on the recovery of the wake was measured.However, a signature of the motions in the spectra of the wake was observed for all frequencies.Kopperstad et al. (2020) investigated in a wind tunnel and with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) the wake of a spar and barge floating turbine.They showed that a floating turbine's wake recovers faster than a fixed turbine in a laminar wind.Also, the recovery depends on the wave excitation.
Numerical simulations using free-wake vortex code and CFD were carried out to study the different wake regions of a floating turbine (Farrugia, Sant & Micallef 2016;Lee & Lee 2019;Chen, Liang & Li 2022;Kleine et al. 2022;Li, Dong & Yang 2022;Ramos-García et al. 2022).Farrugia et al. (2016) outlined the possibility for surge motion 'to induce the onset of complex interactions between adjacent tip vortices'.These instabilities induced by surge motion on the complex helical vortex system could explain the faster recovery of the wake of a surging turbine for a range of St ∈ [0.4,1.7], studied by Ramos-García et al. (2022).Based on the stability theory of vortices, Kleine et al. (2022) showed that the motion of a floating turbine 'excites vortex instabilities modes', which were predicted by Farrugia et al. (2016).They showed that disturbances at frequencies of 0.5 and 1.5 times the rotor's 1P frequency produce the most significant disruptions.Chen et al. (2022) carried out CFD simulations of the wake of a surging turbine with amplitude A p ∈ [0.03D, 0.1D], and frequency St ∈ [0.41, 1.64].They showed the positive impact of motions on the recovery of the wake of a surging turbine, where up to 10 % more recovery compared with the fixed turbine was found.Last but not least, Li et al. (2022) used CFD to study the onset of wake meandering arising from the sideways motion of a floating turbine.They demonstrated that sway motion for St ∈ [0.2, 0.6] helps the wake to recover up to 25 % more compared with the fixed case.They showed that side-to-side turbine motions lead to large wake meandering, even with small amplitude of motions (A p /D ≈ 0.01).This important result is particularly pronounced for low turbulent conditions (TI ∞ < 0.05).In a wind farm configuration, wake oscillations can increase the movement of downstream floating wind turbines (Wise & Bachynski 2020).
The discussion mentioned above shows that the current understanding of the wake of floating wind turbines is based on many specific investigations.It remains unclear which frequency range and type of motion influence the wake generated by a FOWT.Moreover, the effects on wake dynamics are not yet sufficiently understood.The lack of systematic studies in this area limits the ability to draw general conclusions.The papers published so far have focused mainly on cases of high turbulence (TI ∞ > 0.08) where the effect of the motions is mixed with the effect of the turbulence, which makes the problem particularly complex.In Pimenta et al. (2021), we reported on pp.4-5 on wind tunnel experiments that we conducted in 2021 on cases similar to Li et al. (2022).In this paper, we extended our experiments to side-to-side and fore-aft harmonic motions (see figure 1 for the different DoFs) to obtain a more global understanding of the wake development of a FOWT.A particular focus was given to the influence of the frequency of movements.In order to examine solely the impact of the motion on the wake and to exclude any impact of inflow turbulence, the turbine was operated in laminar wind.
This simplification to laminar inflow conditions was made in order to reduce the complex environment of a FOWT, necessary to gain a more fundamental understanding of the wake dynamics of this new type of wind turbine.Our work focuses on analysing the impact of a periodic motion on wake recovery and studying underlying mechanisms affecting the recovery.We discovered rich nonlinear dynamics in the wake, which are driven by the motions of the platform.We believe these results are of interest not only in the context of wind energy but also for fluid mechanics of turbulent wakes in general, with a new insight on the transition to far-wake in high Re flow (Re > 10 5 ) periodically excited.
Section 2 details the experimental set-up and the cases investigated.Section 3 presents the averaged results, i.e. the profiles of wake deficit and turbulence intensity.Here, we show the dependency on the DoF on the wake.We describe the effects of side-to-side motions with St ∈ [0, 0.58] and fore-aft motions with St ∈ [0, 0.97] on wake recovery.We identify two regions in the wake corresponding roughly to the transition region and the far-wake (see (i) above).Section 4 first examines the dynamics of the far-wake (for x ≥ 6D) and discusses the results regarding nonlinear dynamics.Section 5 then focuses on the development of wake dynamics in the shear layer for x ≥ 3D (i.e. in the transition region).Section 6 finally brings together the recovery results with the nonlinear dynamics.We finish by discussing the transition to far-wake in a broader context.

Set-up
The experimental set-up used to perform the investigations is illustrated in figure 2. The experiments were done in the 3 m × 3 m × 30 m test section of the large wind tunnel of the University of Oldenburg (Kröger et al. 2018).The set-up consists of the Model Wind Turbine Oldenburg 0.6 (MoWiTO 0.6) with a diameter of 0.58 m mounted on a six-DoF motorised platform, designed specifically for the MoWiTO 0.6 (Messmer et al. 2022).With this system, the model turbine can be moved following predefined motion signals in the six-DoF: the three translations -surge, sway and heave; and the three rotations -roll, pitch and yaw.In this paper, we use the terminology 'floating wind turbine' to describe our experimental set-up, despite the fact that we consider idealised conditions (harmonic motion and laminar wind).
The model turbine was equipped with a strain gauge to measure the thrust, T, of the ensemble (tower and rotor).For any case investigated, power produced, rotational speed and thrust of the turbine were recorded.The movements of the platform were recorded to verify the adequacy of the motions.The streamwise wind speed, U, was measured with an array of 19 one-dimensional hot-wires of ∼1 mm length, resolving turbulent scale of this size.
The probes were operated with multichannel constant temperature anemometer (54N80-CTA) modules from Dantec Dynamics.Data were acquired with a sampling rate of 6 kHz, gathering around 10 6 points for each measurement.The time of measurements, T meas , was sufficient to reach statistical convergence of any postprocessed data shown and discussed in this paper.The hot-wire probes were calibrated twice daily, and temperature, humidity and air pressure were recorded throughout the day to track any drift effects, which turned out to be negligible.The inflow wind speed was measured with a Prandtl-tube approximately 2 m in front of the model turbine.
The array was mounted on a moving motorised cart, which allowed us to measure the wind speed at a downstream position, x, from 1.5D to 12D (cf.figure 2a).The hot-wires were placed on a horizontal line at hub height (around 1 m above floor level) and span lateral positions, y from −2.5R to 2.5R (R = D/2) with respect to the hub centre (cf.figure 2b).

The MoWiTO 0.6
The MoWiTO 0.6 used for the experiments has a rotor diameter D of 0.58 m.The turbine was developed at the University of Oldenburg (Schottler et al. 2016;Jüchter et al. 2022).The properties of the turbine are depicted in table 1.The model turbine was used for several measurement campaigns with a focus on wake flow; further details of the experimental procedure and wake measurements can be found in Hulsman et al. (2020), Neunaber et al. (2020) and Neunaber, Hölling & Obligado (2024).
For the experiments, we used wind speeds between 3 and 5 m s −1 .We fixed the tip speed ratio for all cases so that TSR = 6 ± 0.1.We operated the turbine at a constant blade pitch angle, around the optimum, which gives C T = 0.86 ± 0.05 for U ∞ = 3 m s −1 and C T = 0.81 ± 0.05 for U ∞ = 5 m s −1 .The thrust coefficient account for rotor and tower aerodynamic loads (in a previous study by Neunaber et al. (2020), the load on the tower and nacelle without the blades of the MoWiTO 0.6 was measured to be 17 % of the total thrust coefficient).The power performance of the turbine depends on Re, we measured C p = 0.21 ± 0.01 at U ∞ = 3 m s −1 and C p = 0.3 ± 0.01 at U ∞ = 5 m s −1 .

Non-dimensional parameters that drive the wake behaviour
Our experimental research involves numerous quantities.We briefly discuss the selection of necessary parameters for a complete characterisation.Therefore, we use the basis of the π-theorem.For a given DoF, the system investigated involves nine independent parameters: platform motion frequency and amplitude; inflow wind speed; rotor diameter; air viscosity; air density; turbine thrust and power; and rotational speed.These are noted as f p , A p , U ∞ , D, μ, ρ, T, P, ω.The π-theorem suggests that, a problem characterised Table 2. Dimensionless parameters that drive the wake of a FOWT.
by m dimensional variables can always be reduced to a set of m − n dimensionless parameters (π-groups), with n the fundamental units of measure (dimensions) as depicted by Buckingham (1914).Therefore, this problem with nine variables and three dimensions can be reduced to six dimensionless parameters.These are all defined in table 2, namely the thrust coefficient, C T , power coefficient, C P , tip speed ratio, TSR, reduced amplitude, A * , Strouhal number, St, and Reynolds number, Re.Thus, in a laminar flow, the properties of the wake of a FOWT, wake FOWT , are determined by these six dimensionless numbers: The dependency on C T of wake recovery and expansion of a wind turbine wake was characterised extensively (Porté-Agel et al. 2020).The tip speed ratio also plays an important role in the development of the wake of a FOWT (Farrugia et al. 2016).Both the amplitude and frequency of motions can impact the wake of a moving turbine, as demonstrated by Chen et al. (2022), Li et al. (2022) and Ramos-García et al. (2022).As mentioned above, motion frequency has a greater influence on wake dynamics, even at low amplitudes (A p ∼ 0.01D).Based on these works and the set of parameters, we concluded that it is worth focusing on the impact of different St values at a small amplitude of motions.
In our experiments, we used idealised conditions (laminar wind with TI ∞ ≈ 0.003 and one-DoF harmonic motions).We also carried out experiments with TI ∞ = 0.03 and observed similar results as the ones shown and discussed in this paper.Our study investigates the following DoFs: surge; sway; roll; pitch (see figure 1).We examined these DoFs independently, without combining them.We imposed the following motion signal on the platform, ξ , for a given DoF: ξ(t) = A p sin(2πf p t) = A * D sin(2π(StU ∞ /D)t).Here, A p denotes the amplitude of motion (in m or • ), and f p represents the frequency of motion (in Hz).
In order to investigate a relevant range of St, we looked at the typical movements of a FOWT, which we briefly present below.The motions of a floating wind turbine are greatly influenced by the type of foundation used (tension-leg platform, semisubmersible, barge or spar).Three distinct ranges of frequencies are usually observed in the motion spectra of a floating turbine.
(i) Wave frequency.A floating platform is subject to ocean waves, which cause motions at frequencies around 0.1 Hz (wave period around 10 s).Although the wave-induced motions are rather low in amplitude (A * ∼ 0.01), they are high in frequency.For a 10 MW turbine at rated wind speed, this type of motion typically gives St ∼ 1.5 (Messmer et al. 2022).(ii) Rotational natural frequency.When a floating turbine is displaced from its equilibrium position (due to a gust or a series of waves), it goes back to equilibrium as a damped harmonic oscillator at a frequency that depends on the DoF.For a spar or a semisubmersible, the pitch and roll natural frequencies are typically around 0.035 Hz (Robertson et al. 2014).For a 10 MW turbine at rated wind speed, such motions give St ∼ 0.5 and A * up to ∼ 0.04.(iii) Translation natural frequency.As with rotational DoF, a floating turbine undergoes translational movements at its natural frequencies.These can be large in amplitude (A * up to ∼0.1) but at low frequency ( f p ∼ 0.01 Hz).A typical Strouhal number is St ∼ 0.1 (Leimeister, Kolios & Collu 2018).
This discussion shows that, typically, the motions of floating turbines cover a range of Strouhal numbers, St ∈ [0, 1.5].While high-frequency movements are relatively low in amplitude (A * ∼ 0.01), oscillations at lower frequencies can reach amplitudes up to 10 % of the rotor diameter.To test a wide range of St, we conducted experiments at frequencies ranging from 0.3 to 5 Hz with low motion amplitudes.We covered St ∈ [0, 0.97] (corresponding to the maximum operability range of the set-up).Table 3 details all the cases investigated in this paper.
To quantify the differences between the cases, we took as reference the fixed case (St = 0).To make this study of our different cases comparable, it is essential to note that the mean power and thrust of the moving turbine were the same as those of the fixed turbine for a given wind speed.If this were not the case, comparing the wake flows between cases would be less meaningful, as there would be differences in mean operating conditions.
It was also confirmed by examining the wake deficit in the very near-wake (x ≈ 1.5D), which was the same for any case with the same Re, C T , C P and TSR .With this, we concluded that the induction factor of the turbine was the same, which was also observed by Fontanella et al. (2022).In particular, such a result is not evident for fore-aft DoF as motions cause temporal variations in turbine power and thrust.We found that they do not affect the mean turbine output values, at least for such low amplitudes.However, the impact of the motions is directly related to their effects on the dynamics of the wake.

Results on average wake values
The scheme after which we present our results is briefly explained next.We consider four DoFs, for which we compare the wakes.The analysis is first done at three downstream positions (x ∈ [[6D, 8D, 10D]]) and then for x ≥ 3D.The downstream dependence of the streamwise wake velocity deficit and turbulence intensity profiles, as well as wake recovery, is shown for different St. Appendix A describes the postprocessing methodology used.
We begin this section by presenting, in § 3.1, the similarity between DoF that led us to reduce the analysis to two generic DoFs, namely sway and surge.Second, the dependency of the wake recovery on the St is shown in § 3.2 for sway.Third, we present corresponding results for surge motions in § 3.3.Finally, we discuss in § 3.4 the results on wake recovery.

Equivalence between different DoF
In a previous study from Bayati et al. (2017a), the authors simplified the modelling of the aerodynamics of a FOWT by linearising rotational motions into translation.We checked whether this simplification also applies to the wake of a turbine with sway/roll motions or surge/pitch motions, respectively.To address this issue, we measured the wake of the floating turbine with small (A p = 0.5 • ) and large (A p = 5 • ) amplitudes of platform roll around the zero value.Additionally, we performed tests with the turbine swaying at an equivalent amplitude.We carried out the same tests with pitch and surge DoFs (with no tilt angle).The results of side-to-side motions (sway and roll) are presented in figure 3, while the fore-aft motions are shown in Appendix B.
For the sway and roll cases, figure 3 demonstrates that the match of U/U ∞ and TI is nearly perfect for the low amplitude (A * = 0.007) and the high amplitude (A * = 0.065).This suggests that the approximation made in Bayati et al. (2017a) can also be applied to the wake for these types of motions.We notice in figure 3(a-c) an asymmetry of the wake; the deficit is greater at y = R than at y = −R, meaning the wake tends to deviate to the left.We attribute this phenomenon to a slight misalignment of the turbine with the incoming wind.For the lowest value of Re, we repeated the experiments by correcting the misalignment; as seen later the wake is more symmetric (this slight asymmetry has no significant influence on our results).
Our findings allowed us to simplify the study by focusing only on sway for side-to-side motion and surge for fore-aft motion.We can extend the conclusions of these DoFs to pitch and roll motions as long as the equivalent amplitude is below a specific value, which we estimate to be around 2 • , i.e.A * ≈ 0.025.

Sway motion
From the results presented in figure 3, we already see that the wake is strongly influenced by the frequency of the motion, i.e. by St.We observed that the wake velocity profile is flatter with increasing frequency of motion.To investigate the St dependency, we measured the wake for different platform motion frequencies at constant amplitude (A * = 0.007 and St ∈ [0.12, 0.58]) similar to the CFD simulations done by Li et al. (2022).
Figure 4 shows the wake deficit and turbulence intensity profiles at 6D, 8D and 10D for the fixed and five sway cases.Most interestingly, we find that for St = 0.42, the wake has the lowest deficit (figure 4b,c; green stars).Similar results are observed for the profiles of TI; see figure 4(e, f ).Another interesting property of wakes, discussed by Porté-Agel et al. (2020), is the merging of the shear layers characterised by the vanishing of the two peaks in the profile of TI.In figure 4(d-f ), it can be seen that the merging occurs for fixed and St < 0.25 between 8D and 10D.In contrast, the merging is found already at 6D for higher St.
To quantify the impact of motion frequency on the wind speed recovery, we computed the average wind speed in the rotor area behind the turbine, so-called wake recovery (cf.Appendix A). Figure 5 shows our results together with the CFD simulations of Li et al. (2022).Although the two datasets are obtained for quite different Re, they match very well.We found that for each downstream position, the amount of wind recovered gradually increases to a maximum for St ≈ 0.4, after which it decreases.Sway motions of the turbine positively impact the recovery for St ∈ [0.2, 0.6], and the impact is less significant outside of this range and approaches that of the fixed case as St 0. Comparing the results   3.
between St = 0 (fixed) and St ≈ 0.4 (optimum with A * = 0.007), we found differences up to 25 % in the recovery; this means that a wind turbine downstream could produce, in this case (St ≈ 0.4), significantly more power.

Surge motion
We now present the results with surge motion in a similar way to that of sway.Based on previous experiments, we concluded the necessity of investigating higher values of St than for sway.In fact, we observed a plateau in the recovery for St > 0.5, which differs from the behaviour with sway motion (figure 5).Thus, we carried out experiments with St ∈ [0, 0.97].To achieve this range of St, we used an inflow wind speed, U ∞ , of 3 m s −1 , see table 3 (tests D.1 and D.2).
The U/U ∞ and TI profiles are shown in figure 6. Notably, the wake for St = 0.81 has the lowest deficit; see profiles marked by yellow pentagons in figure 6(b,c).Likewise, the profile of TI is the lowest at 10D for St = 0.81 (figure 6f ).The merging of the shear layers occurs at around 6D for St ∈ [0.5, 0.8] (figure 6d) and between 8D and 10D for other cases.
We also did the same experiments with U ∞ = 5 m s −1 , with which we could investigate St up to 0.58 (D.3 and D.4 in table 3).We thus have results for two Re, respectively, Re = 1.4 × 10 5 and Re = 2.3 × 10 5 .We calculated the wake recovery to quantify the effect of different values of St on the averaged wind speed in the wake, which we display in figure 7.For each position, the recovery increases for St ∈ [0, 0.6], stays almost constant for St ∈ [0.6, 0.8] and then decreases.Both Re show comparable results.

Discussion and further results on wake recovery
The results show that, for both surge and sway motions, St significantly impacts wake recovery.Sway provides the highest wake recovery in the range of St ∈ [0.2, 0.6] (figure 5).For the surge case, the high recovery range extends to higher Strouhal values; St ∈ [0.3, 0.9].Sway motion shows an optimal recovery well centred at St opt ≈ 0.4, whereas, for surge, the optimum is spread over a range of St opt ∈ [0.5, 0.8].Therefore, we conclude that the dynamic behaviour of the wake is likely to differ depending on the DoF.
Concerning the turbulence intensity, the merging of the shear layers is a binding property of the wake, which provides information about its development.We found that both kinds of motion cause an early merging (x ≤ 6D) compared with fixed case (x > 8D); see TI profiles in figures 4(d) and 6(d).Additionally, the maximum value of TI is higher for the motion cases (up to 20 % more than the fixed case).This indicates that the movements lead to increased turbulence in the wake.As detailed later in the article, this increase occurs through the formation of coherent structures that accelerate the transition between near-wake to far-wake.
Figure 5 shows the recovery for two Re (Re ∼ 10 8 from CFD and Re ∼ 2 × 10 5 in the experiments).The fact that these results match very well is strong evidence that the independence of wake properties from Re for fixed turbines is also valid in our case with a moving turbine.For surge, we have no corresponding CFD results, as for sway, we could only show that the recovery is similar for Re = 1.4 × 10 5 and Re = 2.3 × 10 5 , but due to the similarity of both DoFs, we take as a strong hint that it holds for both motion types.We conclude that the wake of a floating turbine does not depend sensitively on Re, at least for Re > 10 5 .
The results presented so far show the impact of the motion frequency at a constant amplitude (A * = 0.007) on wake recovery and focus on the region where x ≥ 6D.Also of great interest is the evolution of wake recovery between the near-and far-wake.Hereafter, we present and discuss the evolution of recovery from x = 3D.For a few cases, we also investigated larger amplitudes.
Figure 8 shows the evolution of recovery for sway (figure 8a) and surge (figure 8b), respectively, from 3D to 10D with A * = 0.007.For some St, we also tested A * = 0.017.We considered cases equivalent to those of the CFD simulations of Li et al. (2022) for sway motion.
Firstly, for both DoFs, a strong recovery gradient is observed from x = 4D, whereas it only takes place at x = 7D for the fixed case, supporting the idea that the recovery process is enhanced by motion.Secondly, figure 8(a) shows that, for sway with St = 0.29, A * = 0.017, the wake achieves a better recovery than with St = 0.38, A * = 0.017 (for x ≥ 6D).The trend is similar to that of the CFD results.Furthermore, for St = 0.29, A * = 0.007 the recovery is approximately 14 % lower than for St = 0.29, A * = 0.017, indicating the significant impact of the amplitude of the movement on wake recovery.For surge, i.e. in figure 8(b), we see that the evolution of the recovery for St = 0.81, A * = 0.007 and St = 0.38, A * = 0.017 is almost identical.We saw previously in figure 6 that for A * = 0.007, the recovery is much higher with St = 0.81 compared with St = 0.38.These results reveal that, as for sway, the amplitude of motions also plays an important role in the recovery process.We investigate this point in more detail later in § 5, based on the energy of the platform motion, which depends on St and A * .
The recovery evolution for surge motion seems to behave similarly across the different cases once the slope of the wake recovery increases sharply (around x ≈ 5D for St = 0.81 or x ≈ 8D for fixed in figure 8b).Depending on the frequency and amplitude of motion (St and A * ), the position at which the wake begins to re-energise significantly is more or less close to the rotor.Based on previous work from Gambuzza & Ganapathisubramani (2023) and Neunaber et al. (2024), we define for fixed and surge cases a virtual origin, x * 0 depending on St and A * , which corresponds to the position at which the recovery gradient increases significantly.In a first and trivial approach, we identify the downstream location where the recovery is equal to a given value, R * 0 , which we take as 0.58 (here specific to the conditions of our experiments).Figure 9(a) shows the recovery evolution for St ∈ [0, 0.97], A * = 0.007 and St = 0.38, A * = 0.017 with the position of x * 0 (ranging from ∼5D to ∼8D).In figure 9(b), we display the recovery evolution renormalised, i.e. shifted by shows that the location of x * 0 corresponds to the position at which the slope of the recovery curve increases steeply.This is more or less the position at which the shear layers merge, i.e. when the far-wake kicks in.With this rescaling, the recovery curves of figure 9(a) appear to merge together in figure 9(b).This suggests that once the process of wake recovery has completely started, the wakes behave very similarly for all the cases.For sway, the impact of St and A * on wake recovery is similar to surge, although covering different optimum ranges.On the other hand, the renormalisation of the recovery curves is not as straightforward as for surge and requires more investigation.
To get further insights into the phenomena happening, in § 4 we examine the wake dynamics of the floating turbine in the region beyond x * 0 , i.e. for x/D ≥ 6D (in the far-wake for most of the cases).We then focus in § 5 on the area around x * 0 , i.e. the transition region closer to the rotor, for x ≥ 3D, where the wake dynamics are developing.

Far-wake dynamics
Next, we analyse the impact of the periodic excitation on wake dynamics for downstream positions beyond x * 0 , i.e. in the far-wake.Section 4.1 first provides a short basis on energy concepts needed to quantify the effects of platform motions on wake dynamics.Sections 4.2 and 4.3 focus then on the impact of the platform motions on the dynamics of the developed wake (x ≥ 6D) for sway and surge, respectively.Sections 4.4 discusses the results in terms of nonlinear dynamics.Sections 4.5 finally compares wake dynamics of sway and surge.

Basic energy concepts
In this subsection, we provide a basic mathematical framework for the energy concepts of driving motion from the platform as well as coherent structures in the wake.We start with quantifying the specific energy (i.e.energy per unit mass) of the rotor movements, which is at least partially brought to the wake.The movement velocity is The specific energy, e m , and specific power, p m , of the movement are given by The mean specific energy of the motions, p is expressed as follows: Equation ( 4.3) shows that the mean specific energy of the driving motions is quadratically dependent on (StA * ).In § 3.4, it was seen that for a given frequency of motion St, the wake recovery depends on A * , showing that the energy of the driving motions is an important parameter.In figure 9, we mainly compared surge cases with the same amplitude A * = 0.007, but different St, so with varying p , which cannot be omitted otherwise the comparison of different St is misleading.
As shown later in the paper, the wake of the moving turbine contains coherent structures.A turbulent wind speed signal containing a number N of coherent structures can be decomposed as the summation of the mean speed, the contributions of the coherent structures and the purely stochastic part (Reynolds & Hussain 1972;Baj & Buxton 2019).The multiple decomposition of U(t) can be written as follows: (4.4) In (4.4), Ũ(φ n (t)) is the nth periodic fluctuation which describes the coherent structure's velocity which oscillates with a period 1/f n such that Ũ(φ n (t)) = a n f (t + 1/f n ).The complex wake flow of a floating wind turbine might contain multiple coherent structures.Thus, we consider n ∈ [[1, N]].The power spectrum of u = U(t) − U (noted Φ x ) contains the specific energy of each coherent structure, e( f n ) as well as of the stochastic fluctuations, e s .We express u 2 as (4.5) In (4.5), f K is the highest frequency that is physically meaningful, i.e. that contains energy from the flow (note here that we assume that turbulence is frozen (Taylor hypothesis), and so whether we consider time scale or length scale, the outcomes are the same).f K is the frequency associated with the smallest eddy in the flow, in the dissipation region of the spectrum, called the Kolmogorov scale (Pope 2000).In (4.5), e( f n ) is calculated following the methodology described in Appendix A(e).
We next define an amplification factor, k, to quantify the energy contained in the coherent structures that form in response to the motions with respect to the 'specific energy of the driving motions', p .We use as a basis the study of Fiedler & Mensing (1985), who quantified the energy contained in coherent structures formed in a sinusoidally excited shear layer for low Reynolds (Re < 10 3 ).Although the wake of a moving wind turbine is quite different to that of a conventional shear layer, the two systems show some similarities in the dynamics.We define k as the ratio of the sum of the specific energy of the coherent structures, ẽ (defined in (4.5)) to the 'specific energy of the driving motions', p (defined in (4.3)) as In this study, we restrain N ≤ 4, which is sufficient to account for the most energetic coherent structures.We use the term energy to refer to any specific energy and use the letter e for this quantity.We identified in each spectrum the N most energetic peaks, for which we calculate the amount of energy associated.For some cases, no periodic structures are found (N = 0), and for some others, only f 1 makes sense (so N = 1) and fits with the formulation of (4.4)-(4.5).

Far-wake dynamics under sway motion
During a sway motion cycle, wakes are generated at various horizontal positions spanning y ∈ [−A p , +A p ].The mixing and interaction of these 'multiple' wakes affect the mean wake.For low frequencies, the wakes emitted at different horizontal positions superpose linearly (as shown in Appendix B and also observed in Meng et al. (2022)).As in our case we are interested in small amplitudes (A * ∼ 0.01) we assume that this linear superposition holds if the profiles of U/U ∞ and TI coincide the fixed case.Clear deviations are interpreted as a nonlinear response.As seen in figure 5, for St = 0.12, the wake profiles match well the fixed case, but is not the cases for higher St.
To further investigate the wake generated by the swaying turbine, we computed the power spectra, Φ x (see Appendix A(d) for details) from the hot-wire measurements of the  For St = 0.42, the spectra along the centreline more or less collapse for fD/U ∞ > 1, see figure 10(c).In the inertia subrange ( fD/U ∞ ∈ [1, ∼ 20]), Φ x ∝ f −5/3 , which shows that turbulence in the wake centre is fully developed (Pope 2000; Neunaber et al. 2020).Thus, the far-wake is already reached at x ≤ 6D for St = 0.42, which aligns with the merging of the shear layers seen in figure 4(d).
All three spectra are unequal for St = 0 (figure 10a) and St = 0.12 (figure 10b), showing that the fully developed region takes place at x > 8D.
At y = 0.75R, the spectra of the fixed turbine display a region of high turbulent energy for fD/U ∞ ∈ [0.1, 0.5], showing the presence of flow structures with characteristic frequencies in this range (figure 10d).According to Foti et al. (2018), the far-wake of a wind turbine experiences meandering at natural frequencies, typically in the range of f m ∈ [0.1, 0.5]U ∞ /D.Gupta & Wan (2019) explain that the inherently erratic wake tends to amplify small perturbations, resulting in unstructured wake meanderings far downstream.
The broad peak at f m D/U ∞ ≈ 0.3 is consistent with this explanation, suggesting that such meanderings result from shear flow instabilities and differ from vortex shedding.
The spectra for St = 0.42 show a distinct peak at the frequency of movements for all downstream positions as well the harmonic at 2St, see figure 10( f ).Meanwhile, for St = 0.12 (figure 10e), a barely distinguishable peak at St is found.For the higher St, around 60 % of the energy contained in the range of fD/U ∞ ∈ [0.1, 0.5] is concentrated in the peak at St and secondarily at 2St (see figure 11i).The peak at the motion frequency is a clear signature of the motions in the wake, indicating that the far-wake contains a coherent structure at a scale of St.This was likewise observed by Fu et al. (2019) and x/D (−) 6 8 10 x/D (−) 6 8 10 x/D (−) Li et al. (2022).In contrast, for St = 0.12, the energy content is broad and very similar to that of the fixed case.
For St = 0.42, the wake flow locks on to the excitation frequency, somehow having a synchronisation-like effect.For the lowest frequency, this does not appear.This pseudo-lock-in phenomenon, as described in Gupta & Wan (2019), occurs when the wake flow gets in a way synchronised with the forcing frequency imposed by the upstream periodic disturbance and amplifies those perturbations (in our case, the movements of the platform).Pseudo-lock-in depends on the frequency, St of the excitation as well as the energy contained in the initial disturbances, p (Fiedler & Mensing 1985;Karniadakis & Triantafyllou 1989;Pikovsky, Rosenblum & Kurths 2002;Gupta & Wan 2019).A simple representation for synchronisation in the space (Stp ) is the Arnold tongue, which we do not represent here due to insufficient data.Based on the approach of Gupta & Wan (2019), we define the following criterion of 'synchronisation': (i) the main frequency in the spectrum corresponds to the excitation frequency (i.e.f 1 D/U ∞ = St); (ii) the amount of energy contained in this mode is much higher than the next most energetic mode in The intensity of the lock in can be measured by the amount of energy contained in the peak at St. Figure 11(a-d) shows, for fixed and three sway cases, the evolution of the two main frequencies in the spectrum at y = 0.75R for the three downstream positions.Figure 11( e-i) display the amount of energy contained in the two main peaks of figure 11(a-d).We note that for St = 0 (figure 11a,e) and St = 0.12 (figure 11b, f ), the most energetic peak (shown in blue) has low energy and for St = 0.12 this peak appears at a frequency different than St.In contrast, for higher values of St, the clear peak at St found in figure 10( f ) contains a large amount of the total turbulent energy, u 2 /U 2 ∞ (up to 20 %).With respect to the formulation of (4.4),only a coherent structure at St is found for sway DoF (and weakly at 2St).Other frequencies are not related to any specific structure in the flow; thus, mainly, f 1 makes sense.Based on the criterion (4.7), we conclude that with A * = 0.007, synchronisation happens for St ∈ [∼ 0.2, ∼ 0.5] (in Appendix C, we show some wind speed time series in the wake for synchronised and non-synchronised   cases).Figure 11(h) highlights the spatial dependence of synchronisation.The greatest amount of energy in the peak at St is observed at x = 6D.We can, however, expect the synchronisation to be stronger closer to the rotor and to depend on A * .This is investigated later on in § 5.1.After this energy analysis, the signals from the array of hot-wires, with 19 probes aligned horizontally (see figure 2b), are used to visualise the instantaneous wake flow of the turbine (see Appendix A( f ) for more details on the methodology).Figure 12 shows the time evolution of U(x, y, t) for the fixed case (figure 12a,d,g), St = 0.12 (figure 12b,e,h) and St = 0.42 (figure 12c, f,i) at the three downstream positions.For the fixed case, time (x-axis) is multiplied by St m U ∞ /D ≈ 0.3U ∞ /D.In the case of the moving turbine, time is multiplied by the frequency of motion of the platform.
For the above-mentioned case of the highest lock in response (St = 0.42 at x = 6D), we see correspondingly a clear, coherent meandering pattern at the imposed frequency, f p (figure 12c).As we move downstream, the amplitude of meandering increases and the structures become fuzzier.
For fixed and St = 0.12, the meandering structures become more prominent for larger distances but are disordered, especially for St = 0.12, the frequency of the motion is not visible in the wake movements, in accordance with figure 10(e).
Here A * = 0.007, Re = 2.3 × 10 5 .Tests C.1 and C.2 in table 3. Panel (g) illustrates the cross-correlation for τ = 0. § 5.1).This is a remarkable difference from the other cases, which have a tendency to build up way less clear meandering structures only farther downstream.
Coming back to the profiles of wake deficit, we found that the wake expansion is the largest for St = 0.42 (figure 4b,c), which coincides with the biggest meandering amplitudes of the wake field (figure 12c, f,i).In figure 5, we define the wake recovery over a range of y ∈∼ [−R, R], which corresponds to the energy available for a virtual turbine operating in this wake.If a larger range is considered, the recovery is less significant but still higher.From our time-resolved measurements, we find that, compared with the fixed case, the platform's oscillating motions increase the wake's lateral motions, which distributes the energy more uniformly within y ∈ [−2.5R, 2.5R].
The spectra in figure 10 only indicate the presence of some coherent structures in the wake of the swaying wind turbine, but not their type.On the other hand, the instantaneous wake flow fields in figure 12 indicate that these are coherent meandering structures.To further quantify the periodic meandering at a given frequency, we calculated the cross-correlation function (depicted in Appendix A(g)) between U(x, −1/2R, t) and U(x, 1/2R, t + τ ) for τ varying from 0 to 3/f p . Figure 13 shows this quantity computed at 6D (figure 13a), 8D (figure 13b) and 10D (figure 13c) for both fixed and a few swaying cases.We plot (U −1/2R U 1/2R )(τ ) versus τ × f p , except for the fixed case where we set τ × f p = τ .In figure 13(a), it can be seen that for St ∈ [0.2, 0.5], (U −1/2R U 1/2R )(τ ) is a harmonic function with a period equal to the platform's oscillation period, 1/f p , consistent with the pseudo-lock-in phenomenon.The function attains its minimum value (negative value) at τ ≈ 0. For x = 6D and St = 0.42 (figure 13a), the minimum value of (U −1/2R U 1/2R )(τ ≈ 0) is approximately −0.3, which indicates that the signals U(−1/2R, t) and U(1/2R, t) are anticorrelated.This anticorrelation quantifies the side-to-side motion of the wake at a specific frequency.When the wake meanders to the left, U(1/2R, t) decreases and U(−1/2R, t) increases and vice versa (for illustration, see figure 13g).Consistently, the correlation is maximal at τ ≈ 1/2f p .In figure 13(d-f ), (U −1/2R U 1/2R )(τ ≈ 0) is plotted versus St for the three downstream positions.In figure 13(d), the anticorrelation is significant in the range of St ∈ [0.2, 0.5] and close to zero for other values, confirming the range of motion frequencies that initiates large coherent wake meandering.

Far-wake dynamics under surge motion
Unlike sway motions, surge motions induce variations of C T that affect the dynamics of the overall wake (Fontanella et al. 2021).We can write C T (t) = C T + C T sin(2πf p t + φ), with C T the amplitude of thrust oscillation and φ the phase shift with the signal of motion.In our case, following quasisteady theory, the highest value of thrust coefficient variation is C max T ≈ 0.07 for f p = 5 Hz, A p = 0.004 m, U ∞ = 3 m s −1 .Besides the C T variations, the wake is generated behind the turbine at various x locations spanning [−A p , +A p ] during one cycle of motion.
As with sway, when St < 0.1, the wake of the surging turbine is similar to that of the fixed turbine, even at high amplitude (see Appendix B), which is consistent with Schliffke et al. (2020), Meng et al. (2022) and Belvasi et al. (2022).When the frequency is higher, St ≥ 0.2, the interactions of the wakes emitted at different x positions and with C T (t) become more complex.
To understand the impact of surge motions on the dynamics of the wake we carried out a similar analysis to that made for sway ( § 4.2). Figure 14 shows the power spectra of fixed (figure 14a,d), surge with St = 0.38 (figure 14b,e) and surge with St = 0.81 (figure 14c, f ) for x = 6D, 8D, 10D at y = 0 (figure 14a-c) and y = 0.75R (figure 14d-f ).
The spectra of St = 0.81 at y = 0 all collapsed to one spectrum for fD/U ∞ > 1.0, and Φ x ∝ f −5/3 (for fD/U ∞ ∈ [1, ∼ 20]) which confirms that the far-wake is reached for x ≤ 6D.Whereas for the lowest St and the fixed case, the far-wake is found for larger distances, x > 6D.This behaviour is very similar to that observed for the swaying turbine.Here Φ x at y = 0.75R (figure 14e, f ) exhibit a pronounced peak at the motion frequency, St, for both surge cases, in line with results from Schliffke et al. (2020) and Belvasi et al. (2022).As with sway, this indicates that the wake of the surging turbine contains coherent flow structures with a characteristic frequency of f p .The peak is for both St maximum at x = 6D and then decreases.
When looking at the spectra of the fixed turbine at y = 0.75R, the frequency range with the largest amount of energy is similar (0.1 < fD/U ∞ < 0.5) to that of the other fixed case in figure 10(d).The maximum energy is located at f m ≈ 0.3U ∞ /D, which is close to that of figure 10(d).These two cases have a Re from 2.3 × 10 5 in figure 10 to 1.4 × 10 5 in figure 14.
Looking at the case with St = 0.38, it is interesting to note that all the frequency components of the fixed case are dominated by the narrow peak corresponding to the excitation frequency, i.e. at St = 0.38.This is somehow similar to the sway case (see figure 10f ).For St = 0.81, compared with the sway case, a new dynamical behaviour is observed; we find two frequencies in the spectra with apparent mixing components (see figure 14f ).One peak is at the excitation frequency, i.e.St = 0.81.The other peak at ∼0.31U ∞ /D seems to be due to a self-generated mode, f * of the wake (in [0.1, 0.5]U ∞ /D).Most interestingly, the further smaller peaks are related to linear combinations of the two frequencies, i.e. with aSt + b( f * D/U ∞ ).One small peak is around (a, b) = (1, −1/2) and another one at (a, b) = (1, −1).This proves nonlinear mode coupling, which is discussed later in § 4.4.For other values of St ∈ [0.6, 0.9], we also observe a second large peak at a frequency, f * in [0.1, 0.5]U ∞ /D like the one at 0.31U ∞ /D for St = 0.81.We emphasise here that the value of f * does not appear to be universal.
As with sway, we are interested in the spatiotemporal structure of these oscillating modes.We show in figure 15    For the lowest St, we show the case with the largest amplitude because it features the most distinct structures.
For St = 0.38 (figure 15a,b), the wake exhibits a clear pulsating pattern at the platform frequency, f p .This coherent structure is directly linked to the peak at St in figure 14(e).The wind speeds at y = ±R are in phase, and the wake motions act like a pump, pumping the outer fluid into the inner wake (see the alternation of high and low speeds in the wake in figure 15b).As with sway, the coherent structures are of the order of the rotor diameter, showing the large amplification of the turbine's motions.
The flow dynamics for St = 0.81 are quite different, as the wake at 6D (figure 15c,b) reveals a coherent meandering structure with a frequency of f * ≈ 0.31U ∞ /D, fully consistent with the spectrum of this case (figure 14f ).The pulsating mode found for the lowest St is almost not observed for the highest St, and the wake of the surging turbine with St = 0.81 unexpectedly closely resembles that of the swaying turbine (figure 12c).However, compared with sway, the coherent meandering mode of surge seems less structured, which is discussed further in § 4.5.
For 0.2 < St < 0.55, (U −1/2R U 1/2R )(τ ) is a harmonic function with a period of 1/f p , and the cross-correlation is maximal (positive) at τ ≈ 0. The velocity fluctuations between y = −1/2R and y = 1/2R are in phase, which implies that the wake undergoes pulsating movements and not meandering.
On the other hand, for St = 0.81, (U −1/2R U 1/2R )(τ ) is a harmonic function with a period of ∼D/(0.31U∞ ), and the cross-correlation is minimum (negative) at τ ≈ 0. This behaviour is associated with coherent meandering movements of the wake at a given frequency, as discussed for sway in § 4.2 and is consistent with the instantaneous flow fields shown in figure 15(c,d).
Next, we show that the analysis of the cross-correlation functions allows us to distinguish the different ranges of St for which the dynamic behaviour of the wake changes.In figure 16(d-f ), the St dependency of the cross-correlation at τ ≈ 0 is shown.The fit of this cross-correlation allows us to identify three distinct regions, highlighted in figure 16(d) and schematically visualised in figure 16(g-i).For St < 0.2 and St ≈ 1.0 (zone (g)), the motions do not significantly impact the wake's dynamic, which is similar to that of the fixed turbine (as illustrated in figure 16g).It shows disordered natural meandering.For St ∈ [0.2, 0.55] (zone (h)), the positive correlation values indicate that the wake undergoes pulsing movements (maximum correlation at St ≈ 0.4).A clear, coherent structure at the excitation frequency St is found in the wake.For the range of St in the zone (h), the criterion of (4.7) is satisfied, which shows that synchronisation is occurring (as observed with sway in figure 13d).In Appendix C, we display some wind speed time series in the wake for St ∈ [0, 0.4] illustrating instances of synchronisation and non-synchronisation. Figure 16(h) shows a typical pulsating pattern in the wake.For St > 0.55, (U −1/2R U 1/2R )(τ ≈ 0) decreases and becomes negative, indicating that the wake undergoes coherent meandering, as shown in figure 16(i).
Farther downstream, figure 16(e, f ) indicate that pulsating wake movements, as well as the periodic meandering ones, gradually vanish.

Discussion in terms of nonlinear dynamical system
The following discussion concentrates on the boundary region of the wake, which is dominated by shear (y ∈ [0.5R, 1.3R]).First, we summarise the observations made in the wake of the fixed turbine.For this case, we found a kind of broadband coloured noise in the range of fD/U ∞ ∈ [0.1, 0.5] (see figures 10d and 14d) with a maximum at approximately 0.3 which we denoted as meandering frequency, St m (but it does not appear as a clear peak in the spectra in figures 10d and 14d).As mentioned in the introduction, this broadband noise is consistent with Okulov et al. (2014), Foti et al. (2018), Heisel et al. (2018) and&Wan (2019).These dynamics are the result of the development of shear layer instabilities.
Clear differences in wake dynamics are seen between sway and surge motions.Whereas under sway motions, one clear coherent wake meandering mode is found (for St ∈ [0.2, 0.5]), we observe two modes for surge, namely a pulsing (for St ∈ [0.2, 0.55]) and a meandering mode (for St ∈ [0.55, 0.9]) as seen in figure 16(d).The pulsing mode vanishes, or gets damped out, for larger distances (x > 8D) as well as for higher St numbers (St > 0.6).Adjacent to this pulsing mode region, a smeared-out coherent meandering mode is observed for higher St (see figure 15d).
These modes can be interpreted in terms of general characteristics of nonlinear dynamics (Peinke et al. 2012;Argyris et al. 2015).The first remarkable feature is the synchronisation of the wake dynamics to the forcing frequency of the platform motion (see figure 10f for sway and figure 14e for surge).Compared with the spectra of the fixed case, we clearly see how the broadband frequency gets slaved to a narrow band peak (Haken 2012).Such a synchronisation effect, or pseudo-lock-in, is a prominent feature  of nonlinear dynamics discussed in various contexts (Pikovsky et al. 2002).Here, the results suggest that the synchronisation effect is caused by the driving surge or sway motion, which has a similar effect to that of the coupling of pendulums (Acebrón et al. 2005).This is consistent with our observations that the amplitude of the meandering and pulsing due to platform movements is approximately one to two orders of magnitude larger (∼D) than the amplitude of the platform's motion (∼0.01D), indicating a significant amplification of the small disturbances that develop downstream (quantified later on in § 5).Another characteristic of synchronisation is that it is robust to changes in the driving frequency within a finite range (Fiedler & Mensing 1985;Karniadakis & Triantafyllou 1989;Pikovsky et al. 2002;Gupta & Wan 2019).At the end of such a synchronisation range, other nonlinear effects emerge.The tracking to the driving frequency is clearly seen for our experiments (see figure 17c-f ).In summary, we observe a synchronisation of the dynamics of the boundary region of the wake to the platform motion, together with a high amplification of the amplitude.A strong reduction of the broadband structure of the initial frequency (wake of the fixed turbine) and locking to the exciting frequency is clearly observed for St ∈ [0.2, 0.55] for both sway and surge.This effect corresponds to a significant reduction in the wake dynamical DoF, in the sense that the nonlinear dynamic oscillation has a low dimension, with only two DoF.
In contrast to sway, the wake under surge motion shows further phenomena of nonlinear dynamics.Two spatiotemporal wake patterns are observed, namely the pulsing and the meandering mode (figure 16h,i).As discussed above, for surge with St > 0.55, two frequencies with mixing components are seen in the spectra (figure 14f ), the exciting frequency, St and a self-generated narrow band mode, f * D/U ∞ ∈ [0.1, 0.5].A coupling of these frequencies is a clear sign of nonlinear dynamics.Figure 17   .Such a dynamic is part of the class of quasiperiodic systems, described with the generic model of circle map, which characterises the quite complex and fast-changing dynamical behaviour under such nonlinearities (Argyris et al. 2015).We observe that one time, the amplitude of the driving frequency is larger, and the other time, the amplitude of the self-generated mode is greater (see figure 17g x = 6D and x = 8D).Mixing components are more or less pronounced, similar to previous observations of nonlinearities with semiconductors as shown in figure 3.56 in Peinke et al. (2012).
The origin of the self-generated meandering mode induced by surge motion is unclear.It is surprising that fore-aft rotor movements induce sideways oscillation of the wake.We measured at x = 6D the wake for many surge cases with St ∈ [0.6, 0.9] (cases D.2 * * in table 3).We report in table 4 all the values of f * that we measured.They lie in the interval [0.1, 0.5]D/U ∞ and are concentrated around f m ≈ 0.3D/U ∞ .This indicates that the self-generated meandering mode is within the region of natural meandering.However, f * = function(St) is still unclear.Further fine-tuned investigations are needed to find a potential relationship, as this is expected from the features of nonlinear dynamics (see circle map behaviour in Peinke et al. (2012)).

Comparison of coherent meandering between sway and surge
We saw that for surge motion, when the quasiperiodic state appears, the wake tends to generate coherent meandering structures at a frequency f * ∈ [0.1, 0.5]D/U ∞ (figures 15c,d and 17f -h).It is of interest to compare this mode with the coherent meandering caused by sway motions.We make a comparison, in figure 18, of the wake from the turbine moved in surge at St = 0.81 which generates a coherent meandering mode at f * D/U ∞ ≈ 0.3 with the coherent meandering structures due to swaying turbine movements at St = 0.29 (in both cases A * = 0.007).
In figure 18(a), we show the wind speed deficit profiles at x = 6D, which follow very closely for surge and sway, giving a very similar recovery (also observed in figure 8).The wake of the swaying wind turbine, however, expends more, which is also seen in the TI profiles (figure 18d).Moreover, the swaying motions generate more turbulence.The instantaneous flow fields are shown in figure 18(b) for surge and figure 18(c) for sway and the spectra at y = 0.75R in figures 18(e) and 18( f ), respectively.Coherent meandering is made very clear for sway, driven by the excitation frequency St.In contrast, for surge, the structures are not as clear.The instantaneous flow contains the main structure at f * D/U ∞ together with the interacting modes (St − f * D/U ∞ for instance), making in contrast to sway the whole wake less coherent.A closer look at the pattern in figure 18(b) shows that   [48,50]) occur, which supports the idea of interacting modes.The energy contained in the motions is approximately eight times greater for surge compared with sway in this example (see p in § 4.1), but the effect on recovery is very similar for both DoFs.We conclude that for sway, the wake tends to better use the energy of the motion than for surge (at least when comparing sway, St ≈ 0.3 with surge, St > 0.55).We also highlight the more complex structures of the wake with surge motion.

Transition-region dynamics
The results presented so far have focused on the far-wake region, i.e. in the region after the virtual origin, x * 0 defined in § 3.4 (for x ≥ 6D).There, the recovery of the whole wake is advanced and coherent motion-related structures are already decaying.Based on the similar recovery curves beyond x * 0 , we may address this region as 'quasifully developed'.It is definitely of fundamental interest to see how the transition to this developed region evolves.In order to gain further insight, we focus now on the region closer to the rotor (x ≥ 3D) for both sway and surge DoFs, i.e. before x * 0 .This new section relates the recovery results presented in figures 5, 7, 8, 9 to the development of coherent modes in the wake and their energies.
We begin in § 5.1 by presenting the results for sway, showing the amplitude influence on the development of coherent meandering structures and quantifying further the nonlinear synchronisation described in § 4.2.Section 5.2 focuses on surge motion, for which we quantify the evolution of structures related to synchronisation and then examine quasiperiodic modes.Finally, in § 5.3, we bring together all the results and discuss the findings on nonlinear wake dynamics in relation to the recovery results and transition to far-wake.x/D (-) x/D (-) Figure 19.Evolution of turbulent energy, u 2 /U 2 ∞ , energy of the coherent mode, e(St), and energy contained in the range of frequency [0.1, 0.5]U ∞ /D at y = 0.75R for fixed (a), sway with St = 0.29, A * = 0.007 (b) and sway with St = 0.29, A * = 0.017 (c).For panels (b,c) the amplification factor is represented with solid red line (defined in § 4.1).Instantaneous flow at x = 4D is displayed in (d) for A * = 0.007 and in (e) for A * = 0.017.Tests C.3 and C.4 in table 3 (Re = 1.4 × 10 5 ).

Development of coherent meandering and amplitude dependency for sway motion
We have seen in figure 8(a) that for two sway cases with the same motion frequency but varying amplitudes, differences in recovery occur (around 14 % more with the largest amplitude).We also noticed that for a higher amplitude (A * ≈ 0.02), the most favourable St for the recovery is smaller, around St ≈ 0.3 here, which is in good agreement with the CFD results from Li et al. (2022).In the following, we look at the wake development for St = 0.29 with two amplitudes and show the results for x ∈ [[4, 6, 8]]D.
Figure 19 compares the amount of energy contained in the wake at y = 0.75R for fixed case (figure 19a) and for sway with St = 0.29; A * = 0.007 (figure 19b) and A * = 0.017 (figure 19c).Figure 19(b,c) also display the energy contained in the most energetic mode related to the coherent meandering motion of the wake at St (blue thick line) as well as the amplification factor, k (defined in (4.6)) (red solid line).
First, the motions largely enhance the total turbulent energy, ∞ is more than two times higher for A * = 0.017 (figure 19c) compared with the fixed case (figure 19a).A large amount of this turbulent energy is contained in the coherent structure at St (thick blue line in figure 19b,c).For A * = 0.017, the maximum energy of the mode at St is found at x = 4D and around 6D for A * = 0.007.This shows that the spatial development of the structures depends on the energy of the motions.With the same excitation frequency, St = 0.29, the higher amplitude accelerates the build-up.
A visualisation of the instantaneous flows for the two swaying cases at x = 4D is given for A * = 0.007 in figure 19(d) and for A * = 0.017 in figure 19(e).In line with the energy content of the structures, for the highest amplitude (figure 19e), a very clear pattern of coherent meandering is observed, while for the lowest amplitude, the structures are still developing at 4D (figure 19d).The most prominent synchronisation is observed for the largest amplitude at x = 4D.Here, 90 % of the energy in the frequency range [0.1, 0.5]D/U ∞ is contained in the coherent mode (see the blue thick line and the dotted dashed line in figure 19c).
In § 4.1 we derived a formula for the energy of motion, p (4.3) and defined an amplification factor, k (4.6).Between the two sway cases presented here, p is approximately six times bigger for the highest amplitude than the lowest.In figure 19(b,c), k is plotted against x/D in red for the two sway amplitudes.Here, only the energy of the most energetic structure is taken into account, the other modes being insignificant and irrelevant.We find that the structure's energy at St is 90 times greater than that of the rotor motions (for A * = 0.007 at 6D (figure 19b)).This indicates that the initial periodic perturbations are strongly amplified in the wake, forming large, coherent, meandering structures.It is a typical effect of nonlinear synchronisation, which strongly amplifies the energy of the motions.This is somewhat similar to the observations made by Fiedler & Mensing (1985) for a periodically excited shear layer (even tough at much lower Re of approximately 10 3 ).The results in figure 19(b,c) also highlight the amplitude dependence of the amplification, where lower amplitudes give a 'stronger' response (i.e. a higher k), even though, in real terms, the higher amplitude provides more energy to the wake movements.

Development of coherent structures under surge motion
Depending on the frequency of the surge motion, two different types of coherent structures have been found in the wake (figure 16).On the one hand, we observed a synchronisation-like effect of the wake with St ∈ [0.2, 0.55], which leads to the formation of coherent pulsating structures in the wake.On the other hand, for higher St, we saw that the wake not only responds directly to excitation with a peak at St but also tends to generate a coherent meandering mode with a frequency f * in the range [0.1, 0.5]D/U ∞ .In this case, additional structures are found combining St and f * D/U ∞ .In this subsection, we detail the spatial development of the different structures.We start with the synchronisation cases and then move on to the quasiperiodic state.
In figure 20, we display the evolution of the two primary frequencies in the power spectrum of the wind speed fluctuations at y = 0.75R (i.e. in the shear layer) for x ≥ 3D for the fixed case (figure 20a) and surge cases with St = 0.19, A * = 0.007 (figure 20b), St = 0.38, A * = 0.007 (figure 20c), St = 0.38, A * = 0.017 (figure 20d).Figure 20(e-h) shows the evolution of the energy associated with each of these frequencies, as well as their sum and the total turbulent energy (following the formulation of § 4.1).In direct relation to the results presented previously in figure 16, for St < 0.2 (figure 20b, f ), the wake does not synchronise with the periodic platform excitation.Here, up to x = 7D the main peak in the spectrum differs from St. Beyond (x ≥ 7D), the primary mode becomes St but contains almost the same energy as the platform's motion-independent second peak, see figure 20( f ).The energy of the mode is too low to classify the structure as a pseudo-lock-in mode (criterion (4.7) is not fulfilled).Moreover, u 2 /U 2 ∞ is slightly higher but still very close to the energy of the fixed case, by comparing figures 20(e) and 20( f ).
For increasing St, synchronisation is made clear by the main peak in the spectrum; see figure 20(c,d) at St = 0.38.The main peak in the spectrum contains much more energy than the secondary peak and satisfies our synchronisation criterion (4.7).Moreover, the turbulent energy, u 2 /U 2 ∞ , is much higher than for St = 0.The coherent pulsating mode contains more energy for A * = 0.017 (figure 20h) than for A * = 0.007 (figure 20g), and the structure develops earlier for the larger amplitude.As we shall see later, this provides a reasonable explanation for the enhanced recovery observed in figure 8 x/D (−)  two cases of various amplitude.As for sway, when synchronisation happens, most of the energy in [0.1, 0.5]D/U ∞ is concentrated in the peak at St. The wind turbine's wake tends to amplify the initial disturbances leading to the formation of coherent structures, a phenomenon that we quantify by the amplification factor, k (4.6).In figure 21, we plot k for   some surge cases as a function of x/D.The blue lines without markers represent the cases where synchronisation occurs (to calculate k, we have only taken the first mode, f 1 = f p , since the other frequencies are not linked to the platform excitation).We can see that the strongest amplification is obtained for the smallest St, i.e. when the input energy is the lowest.Accordingly, it is consistent with the results obtained for sway.Here, at St = 0.29 (maximum), the coherent structure contains almost 40 times more energy than the driving movements provide.With increasing St, the position where k reaches its maximum moves closer to the rotor, showing the spatial dependency of the synchronisation.For St = 0.38, the highest amplitude exhibits a lower amplification (maximum of 10 for A * = 0.017 against 25 for A * = 0.007).
Figure 22 shows results for cases where St > 0.5 and A * = 0.007, i.e. when quasiperiodic states occur.Similar to the previous figure 20, we plot in figure 22(a-d) the evolution of the four main frequencies in the spectrum (N = 4) at y = 0.75R for x ≥ 3D; fixed case (figure 22a) and surge cases with St = 0.58 (figure 22b), St = 0.81 (figure 22c), St = 0.97 (figure 22d).The energy content of the modes and the total turbulent energy are displayed in figure 22(e-h).The evolution of the energy contained in the first four most energetic peaks for St ∈ [0.55, 0.9] evolves erratically; at a given position, one mode has more energy than the other and vice versa.This is a typical feature of energy exchange between modes in a quasiperiodic system (Peinke et al. 2012).When quasiperiodicity occurs, the four frequencies are linked to coherent structures and contain close amounts of energy.Nevertheless, the peak at f * is always the most energetic, at least for x > 5D (see the blue thick line in figure 22f,g).
The surge case with St = 0.58, figure 22(b, f ), is particularly interesting because it lies at the boundary between synchronisation and quasiperiodicity.The path to quasiperiodicity begins with weak synchronisation before moving towards a higher DoF.The amount of energy contained in the first four modes represents approximately 30 % of the total turbulent energy, again showing the large amount of energy contained in coherent structures with turbine motions.For motions with St ∈ [0.5, 0.9], the amount of turbulent energy is much higher and develops closer to the rotor (figure 22f,g) than in the fixed case (figure 22e).For St = 0.97, the total turbulent energy is lower than in cases where St is smaller, even though the amount of energy introduced by the motions is the highest for St = 0.97 (cf.(4.3)).This result suggests that for St > 0.9, the platform excitation frequency is too far away from the natural wake frequencies, and consequently, the effects on wake dynamics are less marked.
For the quasiperiodic cases, we calculate k taking into account the energy contained in the four most energetic modes, which are combinations of St and f * D/U ∞ .We plot in figure 21 in red the evolution of k for some surge cases with St > 0.55.The maximal value of k is found for St = 0.58.Compared with the cases where synchronisation occurs (blue lines), k decreases less sharply than for synchronised cases.This suggests that structures that interact and exchange energy with each other remain in the wake for longer, although gradually decaying.For the highest St, a very small value of k is found, showing that the wake reacts or, respectively, synchronises weakly to this frequency.

Discussion about enhanced recovery and the nonlinear dynamics
So far, we have seen that sway and surge motion can have an important impact on the recovery of the wake.We quantified the downstream development of the coherent modes at a local point at y = 0.75 (in the shear layer) and showed the strong dependence on both St and A * (figures 19,20,21,22).Most importantly, the impact of sway and surge motion takes place in the transition region before the virtual origin x * 0 .After this region, a similar wake recovery is found (see figure 9).We discuss two aspects in the following: the increase in momentum transport caused by coherent structures and the interaction of excited modes (nonlinear dynamics) with the turbulent cascade.
As already discussed in § 1, it is known that structures of the wake can enhance or block recovery.Whereas tip vortices hinder the transport of momentum to the inner core of the wake (Lignarolo et al. 2015), large wake structures, like coherent meandering, can enhance the transport.Frederik et al. (2020), Korb et al. (2023) and Hodgson et al. (2023) have shown that periodic excitation of the wake can lead to faster recovery.The different studies found an optimum excitation frequency around St ≈ 0.3, similar to our results.In our case with rotor motions, we showed in figures 19, 20, 21, 22 that for both sway and surge, the energy of the motions is amplified within the wake (up to 90 times more) and lead to the formation of coherent structures (figures 12, 15, 16).Our results clearly show that nonlinear dynamics lead over synchronisation-like and quasiperiodic states to such an amplification.The finding of mixing components in the quasiperiodic state proves the nonlinear interaction of the excitation frequency with a self-generated mode, f * .It is astonishing how clear the low-dimensional dynamics are, with one or two fundamental frequencies collecting initially high-dimensional multimodal (turbulent) dynamics.The transition to the fully developed decaying turbulence in the recovery zone is cut short by these nonlinear dynamics.The maximal energy of the low-dimensional dynamics is found at downstream distances, x ∈ [4, 7]D where tip vortices are already mixed up (see figures 20 and 22).Thus, this is a phenomenon of the whole wake, as confirmed by the instantaneous wind fields of the wakes, like in figures 12 and 15.As these low-dimensional dynamics lead to motion amplitude of the wake of approximately the wake width, it is clear that correspondingly, the momentum transport from the unperturbed flow outside to the wake centre is changed fundamentally.
Next, we discuss the consequence of the energy growth of the low-dimensional modes on the transition to the far-wake.At a particular position downstream, these modes reach their maximum energy and then begin to break up and decay, causing them to dissipate their energy.In figure 23(a), we show the downstream evolution of the energy of the coherent modes for surge cases with St ∈ [0.29, 0.81], A * = 0.007 at the local position y = 0.75R.For each case, we identified the position at which the maximum is reached.Figure 23(b) shows these positions together with the position of x * 0 , the virtual origin that we defined in § 3.4 using the recovery curves.A close link between the positions of maximal energy and the virtual origin is evident.To our interpretation, after the maximum energy is reached, the low-dimensional modes do not only break up and dissipate their energy but also initiate the recovery of the far wake.Here, we should note the similarity of our argumentation with those for the flow evolution behind a fractal grid (Vassilicos 2015).
The evolution of the power spectra at y = 0.75R from the transition region to the far-wake is looked at to investigate further the link between the coherent structures and the turbulent cascade.In figure 23(c,d), we show the premultiplied spectra (Φ x × f 5/3 ) for x ∈ [3, 10]D for surge motion with St = 0.38 (figure 23c) and St = 0.81 (figure 23d).In the shear layer, the spectra feature a self-similar region (so-called inertial subrange) that follows the Kolmogorov K41 theory, i.e.Φ x ∝ f −5/3 (Pope 2000).This K41 law, Φ x ∝ f −5/3 , is linked to the turbulent cascade, which transfers energy from large scales (low frequencies) to small dissipative scales (high frequencies).We used premultiplied spectra to identify the ranges of the inertial subrange, here seen as flat regions highlighted by horizontal lines.In contrast to decaying turbulence, the size of the inertial subrange increases with the downstream position.This indicates that energy is fed into the cascade that broadens the spectral range following the K41 law.
In figure 23(c), the spectra are displayed for a synchronised case, with an excitation frequency of St = 0.38.Close to the rotor (at x = 3D, blue curve), the main coherent mode at St is clearly to the left of the inertial subrange.At the transition point (x * 0 ≈ 6D, red curve), the amplitude of the synchronised mode has grown as well as the inertial subrange so that now the mode at St = 0.38 is at the starting point (low-frequency part) of the turbulent cascade.Farther downstream, at x = 10D (green curve), the amplitude of the synchronised mode has decreased, consistent with the interpretation that this periodic mode becomes unstable and inserts its energy into the turbulent cascade.
Figure 23(d) shows the spectra for an excitation frequency at St = 0.81 of a quasiperiodic case.Here, the amplified exciting mode at St = 0.81 is already within the inertial subrange at x = 3D, but the self-generated mode at f * D/U ∞ is out.Figure 22(a) showed that the maximum energy of low-dimensional modes is for x ∈ [5, 6]D.At x = 5D (orange curve in figure 23d), we see that the inertial subrange has extended to the lower frequency f * D/U ∞ .Farther downstream, the amplitudes of the quasiperiodic modes and the turbulent K41 spectrum decrease (see spectrum at 10D, green curves).This is consistent with decaying turbulence in the recovery region of the far wake.
Overall, these results support the interpretation that the nonlinear dynamics cut short the transition to fully developed turbulence and recovery.The building up of low-dimensional dynamics leads not only to a fast growth of their amplitudes but also couples at the transition point (maximal energy at x * 0 ) to the turbulent cascade, thus transferring energy from coherent structures to turbulence.
Last but not least, we complete this discussion by describing the physical significance of the virtual origin, x * 0 .We have seen from the recovery curves in figure 9(b) that beyond x * 0 , wake recovery for the different cases shows close similarities, suggesting that once this region is reached, the wake exhibits universal behaviour.To support this idea, we present in figure 24 the power spectrum of wind speed fluctuations at y = 0, i.e. at the wake's centre.Figure 24(a) shows the spectra for the fixed case (St = 0) and two surge cases (St = 0.38 and St = 0.81) at x = 6D.In line with the previous figures 6 and 14, the wake of the surge case with St = 0.81 is the most developed, exhibiting a greater amount of energy in the region where fD/U ∞ > 1, followed by St = 0.38 and the least developed fixed case.If we examine the spectrum for these three cases also at y = 0 but at x = x * 0 (St, A * ), all the spectra are surprisingly merged, with almost the same energy distribution for fD/U ∞ > 1.Thus at the position x * 0 , the recovery of the whole wake is initiated and the far-wake starts which appears to be universal, i.e. independent of St and A * .

Summary and conclusion
Next, we summarise in § 6.1 our main new findings on the impact of the motions of a floating wind turbine on the wake generated.We then comment on the link between wake dynamics results and enhanced recovery in § 6.2.In § 6.3, we discuss the results in terms of St and a self-generated mode f * , along with coupling components (figures 14f and 17f -h).This organised, low-dimensional (monochromatic or oligochromatic) response is much easier to describe than the complex fixed case.
On one hand, for both DoF and St ∈ [0.2, ∼ 0.5], the wake synchronises (pseudo-lock-in) with the motion frequency St, directly linked to the formation of coherent structures.The energy of these structures, quantified at a point in the shear layer (y = 0.75R), is much higher than that of the driving motions, p (as defined in § 4.1).For sway, we found that a meandering structure contains up to 90 times more energy than the driving motions (cf.figure 19b).Similarly, for surge, up to 40 times more energy than p is found in the coherent pulsating structure (see figures 20g,h and 21 blue curves).This shows the nonlinear amplification of the energy of the driving motions.
On the other hand, for St ∈ [∼ 0.55, 0.9], the surging turbine wake initially synchronises with St. Moving downstream, a self-generated mode f * emerges and falls into the natural frequency range of the fixed turbine wake ( f * ∈ [0.1, 0.5]U ∞ /D).The mixing components of St and f * D/U ∞ indicate nonlinear interactions, characteristic of quasiperiodic systems.These quasiperiodic modes reach energies up to 20 times that of the driving motion (see figure 21; in red).The erratic evolution of the energy of the coupling modes, as depicted in figure 22(b,c, f,g), underscores the unpredictable nature of the interactions between St and f * D/U ∞ characteristic of nonlinear dynamics.
In summary, we worked out one dynamic mode for sway (meandering) and two dynamic modes for surge (pulsating and meandering).

Enhanced recovery due to nonlinear dynamics
These nonlinear dynamical behaviours play an important role in the recovery process.We showed and discussed in § 5 how the wake dynamics develop in the transition region.The synchronised and quasiperiodic modes grow by amplifying the energy of the driving motion.At a position downstream, the modes become unstable.The structures then break down and decay, feeding the turbulent cascade (see figure 23).The movements of the platform enable a faster transition to the far-wake, meaning that the recovery processes start closer to the rotor, around x * 0 .In addition, the coherent modes likely transport momentum and thus improve recovery but also periodically deflect the wake outwards, resulting in greater recovery on average, similar to the effect of blade pitching control strategy on wake dynamics and recovery (Korb et al. 2023).
For surge cases with St > 0.9, our interpretation is that the periodic fluctuations in the near wake destabilise the tip-vortex system closer to the rotor and enhance the generation of small-scale turbulence, which seems to be a reasonable explanation of the high turbulence found close to the rotor (see figure 22h for x = 3D).This might explain why the recovery remains high even though no clear coherent mode is found.

Application to wind energy
The results of this paper show that wake excitation due to platform motion is carried downstream, amplified and interacts nonlinearly, resulting in large coherent meandering or pulsating structures.At the same time an increase in wake recovery compared with a fixed wind turbine (up to 25 % more) is found.As the power is proportional to the cube of the wind speed such a faster recovery of the wind speed in the wake is important for the power production of a wind farm.This potentially compensates partially the effect that the power produced in a wind farm decreases from the first to the following rows, a drop of 40 % is reported in Barthelmie et al. (2009) for the worst wind direction.However, it should be noted that large coherent structures could contribute to increasing loadings on downstream turbines.Further studies are needed to work out the balance between the favourable increase in power and the unfavourable increase in loads.
A further aspect concerns turbulent inflow conditions.To verify the relevance of our study, we performed measurements with TI ∞ up to 0.03.These represent typical conditions for stable atmospheric situations where TI ∞ is low, cf.Angelou et al. (2023).We found that the effects of platform motion remain, in good agreement with the CFD results of Li et al. (2022) (see Appendix D, up to 8 % more recovery for the best sway case is found with TI ∞ = 0.03).Beyond these stable conditions of low turbulence, other situations including higher turbulence intensity, shear and six-DoF stochastic platform motions may lead to different dynamics.Based on the results of Li et al. (2022), for TI ∞ > 0.05, the impact of the motions seems to be more or less cancelled out by the effect of the inflow turbulence.The impact of moving turbines on the wake with broader conditions remains to some extent open.Nevertheless, we have shown that for stable meteorological conditions our results are of importance.

Routes to turbulence
The classical picture of a transition to turbulence is that a laminar flow becomes unstable with increasing parameters, like the Reynolds or Rayleigh numbers.Periodic oscillations occur, which due to further instabilities become higher-dimensional like quasiperiodic, and subsequently chaotic.The chaotic range leads to noisy power spectra, which then evolves, like in the Rayleigh-Bénard system, to weak and finally hard turbulence, cf.Castaing et al. (1989).The final turbulence is characterised by its fractal ordering of many different modes, typically expressed in the K41 law of the inertia subrange by the f −5/3 power spectra.Interestingly, some large scales or superstructures may reappear in the turbulent state as discussed recently by Hartlep, Tilgner & Busse (2003) and Pandey et al. (2018).
For a wake, like behind a wind turbine, the transition to turbulence differs from a closed system.Given the experimental set-up, the evolution to turbulence occurs with distance to the turbine, as the flow is carried away.Similar to fractal grid, see for instance (Hurst & Vassilicos 2007;Vassilicos 2015), the turbulence builds itself up to a point of maximal turbulent energy (see figure 23a) and then a transition to a universal, or fully developed decaying turbulence is seen, which we denoted as the far-wake where the recovery of the whole wake takes place (see figure 24b).Here again a turbulence with its common fractal properties is found (see figure 23c,d).
For the fixed turbine, we found that this transition region has a quite complex multimode structure, which tends to form some erratic meandering structures (see figure 12g) like the so-called re-establishment of a turbulent vortex street or the just-mentioned superstructures.An interesting finding is that this changes fundamentally if the turbine moves periodically in a special range of St numbers.Even very small exciting motions of the turbine lead to large periodic and quasiperiodic structures in the wake.The re-establishment or superstructures get slaved or synchronised to a low-dimensional coherent dynamics, like an excitation of a weakly damped mode.The astonishing finding is that this deviating path to turbulence via nonlinear dynamics is ultimately a short cut, as we find a faster recovery.
There are different open details for this scenario of transition to turbulence.
(a) Is it the nonlinear growth of the low-dimensional nonlinear dynamics that makes these structures finally unstable and leads to accelerated transition?Is there an intrinsic Re number for the growing structures with a threshold, Re c where they become unstable or collapse like breaking water waves?(b) Does chaos play a role?From nonlinear dynamics it is well known that periodically driven damped modes, or quasiperiodicity are good candidates for chaos.A low dimensional dynamic which becomes chaotic would be accompanied by a spectral broadening of the initially well localised frequencies.(c) Is the increase in the background turbulence's inertial subrange towards lower frequencies destabilising the periodic structures?This would require some kind of backward cascade leading to larger structures, as known from two-dimensional turbulence.
For the first two scenarios, the transition is marked by the periodic structures' instability that drives the far-wake's turbulence.The last scenario would be a more complex interplay between low-dimensional dynamics and turbulence.However, it is astonishing that the enhanced recovery, or the faster transition to turbulence, goes along with simple and clear phenomena of low-dimensional nonlinear dynamics.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Scheme of the experimental set-up, the MoWiTO 0.6 mounted on a six-DoF platform installed in the wind tunnel (a) side view and (b) front view.The figure is not to scale.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Wake deficit (a-c) and TI profiles (d-f ) at 6D, 8D and 10D for fixed and two roll and sway cases with the same St and A * , Re = 2.3 × 10 5 .Tests A.1-A.5 in table 3.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Wake recovery expressed by the normalised average wind speed in the rotor area (defined in Appendix A) at 6D (a), 8D (b) and 10D (c) for fixed and six sway cases with varying St and constant A * = 0.007, Re = 2.3 × 10 5 .Tests C.1 and C.2 in table 3. Also plotted with red squares: equivalent data from CFD simulations by Li et al. (2022), for which A * = 0.01, Re = 9.6 × 10 7 and equivalent C T .

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Wake recovery expressed by the normalised average wind speed in the rotor area (defined in Appendix A) at 6D (a), 8D (b) and 10D (c) for fixed and surge cases with varying St, and A * = 0.007, for two Re: 1.4 × 10 5 , 2.3 × 10 5 .Tests D.1-D.4 in table 3.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Evolution of wake recovery against downstream position for surge motion with different St (a) and virtual origin-based rescaling (b).Panel (a) shows the recovery evolution together with the position of x * 0 marked by the dotted lines (downstream position where the recovery is R * 0 = 0.58).Panel (b) displays the same plot as for (a) but with a shift of the recovery curves based on x * 0 .Cases D.1, D.2 and D.2* with St ∈ [0, 0.97], A * = 0.007 and St = 0.38, A * = 0.017 from table 3 are displayed, with Re = 1.4 × 10 5 .

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.(a-d) Evolution of the two main (largest) frequencies in the spectra of (a) fixed case and (b-d) three sway cases at y = 0.75R for x ≥ 6D.(e-h) Evolution of the total turbulent energy, contribution of the different frequencies, energy in [0.1,0.5]D/U∞ for the four cases.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Instantaneous wind field in the wake at 6D, 8D, 10D for fixed case (a,d,g) and two sway cases -St = 0.12 (b,e,h) and St = 0.42 (c, f,i).Here A * = 0.007, Re = 2.3 × 10 5 .Tests C.1 and C.2 in table 3.For the fixed case, time is multiplied by f m = 0.3 × U ∞ /D.For moving cases, time is multiplied by f p .

Table 4 .
shows the power Values of f * (St), the self-generated meandering mode from surge motion for St > 0.55.For each given value, the precision of St is St = 0.01 and of f