Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:33:25.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Postoperative nausea and vomiting research: methodology, assessment and strength of evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

By
John Carlisle
Edited by
Tong Joo Gan  and
Ashraf S. Habib
Foreword by
Henrik Kehlet
Tong Joo Gan
Affiliation:
Duke University Medical Center, Durham
Ashraf S. Habib
Affiliation:
Duke University Medical Center, Durham
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
A Practical Guide
 , pp. 156 - 169
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carlisle, J, Stevenson, CA. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (3): CD004125.Google ScholarPubMed
Colquhuon, D. An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values. R Soc Open Sci 2014; 1: 140216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2: e124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, JPA. How to make more published true. PLoS Med 2014; 11: e1001747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kault, D. False negatives in evidence based medicine. J Med Stat Inform 2014; 2: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, JPT, Altman, DG, Sterne, JAC. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins, JPT, Green, S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed November 2, 2014).Google Scholar
Schulz, KF, Chalmers, I, Hayes, RJ, et al. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dechartres, A, Altman, DG, Trinquart, L, et al. Association between analytic strategies and estimates of treatment outcomes in meta-analyses. JAMA 2014; 312: 623–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallenborn, J, Gelbrich, G, Bulst, D, et al. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone: randomised double blind multicentre trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trikalinos, TA, Trow, P, Schmid, CH. Simulation-based comparison of methods for meta-analysis of proportions and rates. AHRQ Publication 2013; 13: EHC084–EF. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm (accessed November 2, 2014).Google Scholar
Carlisle, JB. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 521–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumikawa, K on behalf of the Japanese Society of Anaesthesiologists. The results of investigation into Dr. Yoshitaka Fujii’s papers. http://www.anesth.or.jp/english/pdf/news20120629.pdf (accessed November 2, 2014).Google Scholar
Klein, AA, ed. Special Collection: Research Misconduct. External announcements: Fujii case. Anaesthesia http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365–2044/homepage/-_research_misconduct.htm (accessed November 2, 2014).Google Scholar
Carlisle, JB. A meta-analysis of prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: randomised controlled trials by Fujii et al. compared with other authors. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 1076–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkes, MM Navickis, RJ. The Boldt affair: a quandary for meta-analysts. Anesthesiol News 2013; 39: 4.Google Scholar
Shafer, SL. Anesthesia & Analgesia – Notice of retractions, February 20, 2009. http://www.aaeditor.org/HWP/Retraction.Notice.pdf (accessed November 2, 2014).Google Scholar
RetractionWatch.com. Critics of Poldermans’ work baffled by NEJM stance on DECREASE papers. http://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/29/critics-of-poldermans-work-baffled-by-nejm-stance-on-decrease-papers/#more-22958 (accessed November 2, 2014).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×