Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:10:17.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pension reform and return-to-work policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2018

Maria D. Fitzpatrick*
Affiliation:
Cornell University and NBER, 292 Caldwell Hall, 14853, Ithaca, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: maria.d.fitzpatrick@cornell.edu

Abstract

For many people, working after beginning retirement benefit collection is a way to enhance financial security by increasing income. Existing research has shown that retirees are sensitive to the Social Security earnings test, which restricts the amount of earnings some beneficiaries can receive. However, little is known about the effects of other types of policies on post-retirement employment. Instead of restricting earnings, many public pension plans restrict the number of hours beneficiaries can work. I use return-to-work rules limiting the number of hours of employment in a state's public pension plan and administrative data on employment and retirement to determine the rules’ effects on retirement decisions and post-retirement labor supply. I find that the increases in the maximum number of hours of post-retirement employment lead to no change in retirement benefit collection and to increases in part-time work among retirees. As such, these policies appear to be binding on the labor supply decisions of some employees. These results are relevant for designing policies aimed at extending work-lives or improving the health of pension systems.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Costrell, RM and Podgursky, M (2009) Peaks, cliffs, and valleys: the peculiar incentives in teacher retirement systems and their consequences for school staffing. Education Finance and Policy 4, 175211.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, GV and Kumar, A (2009) The repeal of the retirement earnings test and the labor supply of older men. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance 8, 429450.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, MD and Lovenheim, M (2014) How does teacher retirement affect student achievement? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6, 120154.Google Scholar
Friedberg, L (1998) The Social Security earnings test and labor supply of older men. In Poterba, JM (ed.), Tax Policy and the Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 121150.Google Scholar
Friedberg, L (2000) The labor supply effects of the social security earnings test. Review of Economics and Statistics 82, 4863.Google Scholar
Gelber, A, Jones, D and Sacks, D (2013) Earnings Adjustment Frictions: Evidence from the Social Security Earnings Test, NBER Working Paper 19491.Google Scholar
Gelber, A, Jones, D and Sacks, D and Song, J (2017) Using Kinked Budget Sets to Estimate Extensive Margin Responses: Evidence from the Social Security Earnings Test, NBER Working Paper 23362.Google Scholar
Koedel, C and Podgursky, M (2016) Teacher pensions. In Hanushek, EA, Machin, SJ and Woessman, L (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Education, vol. 5, pp. 281303. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ni, S and Podgursky, M (2016) How teachers respond to pension system incentives: new estimates and policy applications. Journal of Labor Economics 34, 10751104.Google Scholar
Quinn, JF, Cahill, KE and Giandrea, MD (2018) Transitions from Career Employment Among Public- and Private-sector Workers. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Stock, J and Wise, D (1990) Pensions, the option value of work, and retirement. Econometrica 58, 11511180.Google Scholar