Phosphorous concentration in iron-rich rocks of the Chilpi Group, Bastar Craton, India: implications on late Palaeoproterozoic seawater palaeo-productivity

Abstract The concentration of the bio-limiting nutrient element, phosphorus (P), in seawater is important for primary marine productivity and the evolution of life on geological time scales. The molar percentage of P/Fe in banded iron formations (BIF) and iron oxide-rich chemical sediments is a good proxy for the first-order approximation of seawater P concentration. Bio-available concentration of phosphorus in Precambrian, especially during the late Palaeoproterozoic Era (2.0–1.8 Ga), is poorly constrained. We evaluated the P/Fe ratios of iron-rich rocks from the late Palaeoproterozoic Chilpi Group, Bastar Craton, Central India. The bulk rock molar percentage of P/Fe ratios of the Chilpi rocks vary between 0.11 and 1.17 (average 0.51 ± 0.3), and the average of EPMA spot analysis P/Fe molar ratio is 0.32 ± 0.4; both have values similar to Archaean BIFs of the world. The observed low molar ratio is not an artefact of contamination from terrestrial sources, diagenetic alterations or high-temperature hydrothermal inputs; it indicates the deposition from phosphorus-lean seawater. The modelled P/Fe molar ratio in the Chilpi Group suggests that the concentration of phosphorus in the shallow marine environment was less than 0.12 μM. The low level of phosphorus concentration in seawater during the late Palaeoproterozoic Era is interpreted to be a consequence of the low primary production during a period of low atmospheric oxygen content, which might have impeded the evolution of eukaryotes.


Introduction
Phosphorus and barium are essential nutrient elements for all organisms on the Earth and are often utilized as effective proxies for assessing primary palaeo-productivity (Tribovillard et al. 2006;Wei, 2012;Li et al. 2016, Khaled et al. 2022).Accurate determination of oceanic phosphorus concentrations throughout Earth's history is crucial for gaining insight into the evolution of major biogeochemical cycles and the development of the biosphere.It is believed that the availability of phosphorus played a significant role in regulating primary productivity in oceans by oxic photosynthesis (Kipp & Stüeken, 2017;Rasmussen et al. 2021).Enrichment of organic matter is predominantly influenced by detrital influx, palaeo-productivity and palaeoclimate (Murphy et al. 2000;Wignall & Newton, 2001).On the other hand, preservation of organic matter is primarily influenced by a combination of factors, such as deposition rate, redox conditions and water depth (Demaison & Moore, 1980;Arthur et al. 1998;Sageman et al. 2003).
The concentration of phosphorus (P) in seawater plays a significant role in primary productivity, the burial of organic matter and redox conditions of ocean-atmosphere system (Holland, 1984;Bjerrum & Canfield, 2002;Planavsky et al. 2010;Jones et al. 2015;Li et al. 2020;Tang et al. 2022).In contrast to bioavailable nitrogen, another important element for biological activities, from the atmosphere that can be fixed by microbes, phosphorus is primarily derived from the sources of river water.The amount of phosphorus in river water is influenced by continental weathering (Ruttenberg, 2003), which has played a crucial role in regulating availability of nutrients and thus net primary productivity in seawater (Howarth, 1988;Tyrrell, 1999;Kipp & Stüeken, 2017).Therefore, estimation of the marine phosphate pool size variation over time is necessary to reconstruct significant aspects of the geochemical evolution of seawater and biological evolution of organisms (Holland, 2006).
The seawater phosphorus concentrations can be indirectly estimated from P/Fe ratio of iron oxide-rich chemical sediments (Bjerrum & Canfield, 2002;Planavsky et al. 2010;Jones et al. 2015;Li et al. 2020;Tang et al. 2022).This estimation is based on the geochemical reactions during oxidation of ferrous iron (Fe 2þ ) to ferric (Fe 3þ ) oxides or oxyhydroxides, producing positively charged surfaces which attract negatively charged anions, such as phosphate (PO 4 3-) (Feely et al. 1998;Toner et al. 2009;Robbins et al. 2016).Therefore, P is mainly absorbed by iron oxides (Hemmingsson et al. 2018).The process produces a positive correlation of P and Fe concentrations in the samples (Planavsky et al. 2010;Li et al. 2020).Furthermore, the magnitude of P adsorption depends on the dissolved Si concentration in seawater, allowing for estimation of seawater P concentration from the P/Fe ratio of BIFs and iron oxide-rich sedimentary rocks at a known Si content (Bjerrum & Canfield, 2002;Konhauser et al. 2007;Jones et al. 2015).Detrital contribution affecting the phosphorus concentrations in the seawater can be minimized by using the screening criteria of detrital-poor (Fe/Al ratios > 5), Mn-poor (Fe/Mn ratios > 5) and iron oxide-rich sedimentary rocks (Fe > 5 wt %) for measurements (Planavsky et al. 2010;Li et al. 2020).
Phosphorus concentrations in the late Palaeoproterozoic seawater (~2.0-1.8Ga) from Indian subcontinent have rarely been measured, mostly because of the paucity of BIFs of this time period in India (Bekker et al. 2014).Therefore, a well-preserved BIF horizon in the Chilpi Group, Bastar Craton of Central India (Mishra & Mohanty, 2021;Mohanty & Mishra, 2023) offers a unique opportunity to assess phosphorus levels in the late Palaeoproterozoic seawater.In this contribution, geochemical analyses and petrographic studies were performed on a shallow marine BIF of the Chilpi Group to evaluate seawater phosphorus concentrations.The result would provide insight into the geochemistry of phosphorus during late Palaeoproterozoic and might aid in understanding the delayed evolution of early Eukaryotes.
The Chilpi basin covers an area of ~600 square kilometres on the north-western margin of the Bastar craton (Figure 1(a)).The Nandgaon Group divides the Chilpi basin into two separate sub-basins in the form of basement high.The Chilpi Group comprises conglomerate, coarse arenite (grit), shale and quartzite, with local occurrences of carbonates, cherts and iron-rich beds.A shallow-water cratonic rift or island arc-related environment of deposition has been suggested for the Chilpi Group (Tripathi et al. 1981;Thorat et al. 1990;Basu, 2001;Ramakrishnan & Vaidyanadhan, 2010).
The study was carried out in the northern basin where exposures of the basement rocks, mostly low-grade metamorphosed rhyolites and andesites of the Nandgaon Group, are unconformably overlain by a basal conglomerate of the Chilpi Group (Figure 1(b)).Successively younger rocks of the Chilpi Group occur towards the east, showing gradations from yellowish brown, gritty quartzite with interbanded chert, variegated interbanded quartzite and slaty shale (IBQS), banded hematite jasper/quartzite (BHJQ) with or without carbonate, iron-rich bands associated with BHJQ, massive quartzite (grey, white, light pink), cherty quartzite, dolomite/magnesian limestone, reddish pink slate, buff quartzite, splintery purple shale and shale (Figure 1(b)).Quartz, epidote and calcite veins cut across the layering in the Chilpi succession.The Chhattisgarh Supergroup in the east has a fault contact with the Chilpi Group.
In the studied area, discontinuous bands of BIF occur in the NE-SW and NNE-SSW direction and remain in the contact with BHJQ (footwall) and massive quartzite/dolomite (hanging-wall).The Chilpi BIF varies in texture from massive to platy/laminated, and in colour from steel grey, bluish grey to dark brown, and is mainly composed of haematite with some specularite, goethite and occasionally magnetite.Frequently, the iron-rich bands display ferruginous shale/ferruginous silica parting.Goethite has botryoidal form, and lateritic iron layers are exposed at places.Thin laminae of iron-rich bands also occur within BHJQ (Figure 2).

Methods
Fresh BIF samples of the Chilpi Group were collected from the Lohara area in the eastern basin.The cleaned samples were used for petrographic studies, electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and whole-rock geochemical analyses.The detailed procedure and results of analysis of the carbonate rocks and BIF are given in Mishra & Mohanty (2021) and Mohanty & Mishra (2023).
The total organic carbon (TOC) and total sulphur content of 10 randomly selected BIF samples were analysed using Elementar's CHNS Analyzer at CSIR-Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research (CIMFR), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.For this analysis, ~40 mg of -200 mesh powder sample was treated with concentrated HCl to remove inorganic carbon.After complete removal of inorganic carbon, the samples were neutralized by washing in a crucible and the treated sample powder was dried completely on a hotplate.Detailed experiment procedures for the TOC and S analyses are given in Sinha et al. (2017).The analytical precision is reported to be higher than ± 0.1 %.

5.b.2. Detrital contamination
In order to reconstruct the concentration of P in seawater using the P/Fe ratio of iron-rich chemical sediments, it is essential to assess the purity of the samples and any alteration that might have occurred after deposition.High Al content in the sample is indicative of contamination from terrestrial sources, producing a lower P/Fe ratio.On the other hand, the presence of detrital phosphate minerals such as apatite could increase the P/Fe ratio (Poulton & Raiswell, 2002;Raiswell et al. 2018).Therefore, only samples with high Fe/Al ratio (> 5) in the spot and the bulk rock analysis were considered.Additionally, samples with high Mn content, indicated by Fe/Mn < 5, were excluded from the interpretation (Yao & Millero, 1996).

5.b.3. Diagenesis
The diagenesis can modify the P/Fe ratio of primary ironoxyhydroxide precipitates.Under anoxic conditions, microbial reduction of ferric iron can result in the release of phosphorus into porewater, which can be sequestered as authigenic phosphate minerals like francolite.Additionally, the recycling of Fe 2þ into seawater can transport seawater phosphorus into sediments, leading to an increase in the P/Fe ratio of bulk samples due to repeated absorption of seawater phosphorus during iron redox cycles (Ruttenberg & Berner, 1993;Foellmi, 1996).The iron redox cycle can promote the precipitation of authigenic phosphate.5(a), 5(b)).This observation suggests that the palaeoproductivity had no impact on the organic matter content in the studied samples.The Ba and Ba/Al results indicate a low productivity during the sedimentation of the late Palaeoproterozoic Chilpi Group.Redox conditions play a vital role in the preservation and accumulation of organic matter (Jones & Manning, 1994;Chang et al. 2009;Tang et al. 2020).Good correlation between P 1 and P/Fe 100 molar ratio and a low Phosphorous concentration in Palaeoproterozoic seawater palaeoproductivity correlation between P and Fe content indicate as a contributory factor for P enrichment (Figure 5(c), 5(d)).The limited enrichment of organic matter in the studied samples indicates limited microbial iron reduction, and consequently, decrease in the P/Fe ratio because of higher mobility of Fe than P during late-stage diagenesis (Webb et al. 2003).

5.b.5. Mixing of hydrothermal fluids
Ferrous iron in hydrothermal fluids can be oxidized to form ferric oxyhydroxide which may scavenge or remove phosphorus from seawater (Wheat et al. 1996).This process results in lowering the concentration of phosphorus both in hydrothermally influenced seawater and hydrothermal fluids (Ruttenberg, 2003).To examine

5.b.6. Mineral-specific analysis
The positive correlation between iron and phosphorus concentrations in the bulk rock is suitable for the calculation of phosphorus concentration in the seawater (Planavsky et al. 2010;Li et al. 2020).However, the correlation between iron and phosphorus concentrations in the bulk rock might result from detrital apatite grains in the matrix of BIFs, which requires implementation of fabric-specific P/Fe ratio analysis in iron oxiderich chemical sediments (Tang et al. 2022).In our study, both the bulk rock concentration and fabric-specific EPMA spot analysis of hematite-magnetite grains to avoid the influence of phosphorousrich minerals were evaluated to compare the difference of P/Fe molar ratio, if any, between the two methods.The bulk rock P/Fe molar ratio ranges from 0.11 to 1.17 with an average value of 0.51 ± 0.3 (Table 1) and the fabric-specific spot analysis has average molar P/Fe ratio of 0.32 ± 0.4 (n = 40; Table 2).Considerably similar and low values of phosphorus and positive correlation between iron and phosphorus concentrations are obtained in the EPMA spot analysis and the bulk rock analysis.
These result indicate a minimal diagenetic contribution of P, and the samples are suitable for the evaluation of the phosphorous concentration in the late Palaeoproterozoic shallow seawater.

6.a. Seawater phosphorus concentration of the Chilpi BIF
The P/Fe ratios (0.51 ± 0.3) of the Chilpi BIF samples are at a slightly higher side than some of the coeval BIFs from other localities (Table 3; Bjerrum & Canfield, 2002;Planavsky et al. 2010;Tang et al. 2022).The dissimilar values of P/Fe ratio in seawater in different sections can be attributed to several factors, and one possible explanation is the heterogeneous silica concentration.Silica present in seawater competes with phosphorus for the adsorption site in iron-oxyhydroxides, which can lead to decreased efficacy of phosphorus adsorption (Konhauser et al. 2007).As a result, areas with high seawater Si concentration may exhibit lower P/Fe ratios.

Phosphorous concentration in Palaeoproterozoic seawater palaeoproductivity
Accurate estimation of concentration of silica dissolved seawater during Precambrian is necessary for calculation of phosphorus concentration.Earlier assessments have relied on petrographic characterization and thermodynamic modelling of BIFs and iron oxide-rich sediments (Siever, 1992;Planavsky et al. 2010;Jones et al. 2015).Silica precipitation in seawater column during the Precambrian is estimated to be close to the amorphous silica saturation level of ~2.2 mM (Planavsky et al. 2010).The rate and manner of silica precipitation during early diagenesis and the features of silica absorption and adsorption on clay and zeolite minerals can be inferred from the concentrations of silica saturation, very similar to that of the silicon dioxide polymorph cristobalite (~0.67 mM) (Siever, 1992;Planavsky et al. 2010).Silica sorption tests have indicated that the degree of silica absorption and adsorption onto the surface of iron oxides is dependent on the concentrations of silica present in the seawater (Jones et al. 2015).Therefore, the Si/Fe ratio of Precambrian BIFs and iron oxide-rich chemical sediments can be utilized as a proxy to evaluate the concentration of silica in ancient seawater.
The Si/Fe ratios of Precambrian BIF provide an estimated range of 0.6 -1.5 mM of dissolved silica concentrations in seawater (Jones et al. 2015).The Si concentration in seawater might have been less than 0.1 mM towards the end of Palaeoproterozoic Era (Tang et al. 2022).In the absence of silica-rich authigenic minerals in the granular BIF of Yunmengshan deposit, a fairly low concentration of Si (possibly < 0.67 mM) has been proposed for terminal Palaeoproterozoic shallow seawater (Qiu et al. 2020).We have used a range of 0 -0.67 mM, corresponding to the lowest and highest values of silica concentration, to reconstruct phosphorus concentrations at the late Palaeoproterozoic shallow seawater, similar to the approach followed by Tang et al. (2022).
Based on experiments, Ca 2þ and Mg 2þ ion concentrations in seawater during the Archaean and Proterozoic Eons (up to ~1650 Ma) were suggested to be similar to those of recent seawater (Jones et al. 2015;Tang et al. 2022).Considering this information and the inferred silica concentrations between 0 and 0.67 mM, a very low dissolved phosphorus concentration (below 0.01-0.12μM) would be anticipated in the BIF of the Chilpi Group (Table 1; cf.Jones et al. 2015).

6.b. Global correlation of seawater phosphorus concentration
The P/Fe ratios in the late Palaeoproterozoic Chilpi BIF samples are higher compared to some of the iron formations of the same time period (Table 3), such as Negaunee BIF, Vulcan BIF, Biwabik BIF, Gunflint BIF (Planavsky et al. 2010); Sokoman BIF, Maru BIF (Adekoya, 1998;Bjerrum & Canfield, 2002); Ijil BIF (Bronner et al. 1992) and Mistassini Basin BIF (Gross, 2009).On the other hand, the P/Fe ratios of studied samples are almost equal to the ratios in some of the iron formations of the Archaean Eon (e.g.Bending Lake Greenstone Belt IF, Adams Mine Iron-Kirland Lake area IF, Lake St.Joseph Greenstone belt IF and Mary River IF (Gross, 2009).Neoproterozoic BIFs have much higher P/Fe ratios than Chilpi BIF (Table 3).Secular variation of molar P/Fe ratios of ironrich distal hydrothermal deposits and other BIFs (Figure 6) indicates a low level of seawater phosphorus concentration towards the late Palaeoproterozoic Era.These variations show a nearly equal average values for Archean and Palaeoproterozoic BIFs which are lower than the Neoproterozoic BIFs.A lower average value is also found in Palaeozoic and Mesozoic periods, when BIFs are absent and iron-rich deposits are characterized by oolitic deposits.Such changes might have been influenced by other factors, such as variations in the input of organic matter, fluctuations in the redox conditions of the seawater column, the presence of different mineral phases and consumption of P by different organisms for their growth process.Furthermore, the interaction between Si and Fe can be complex, and the impact of Si on phosphorus adsorption can depend on the specific mineralogical composition of the iron-oxyhydroxides present in a given locality.
Phosphorus is an essential nutrient for primary productivity, and its availability has been a key factor affecting oxygen levels in the Earth's atmosphere over geological time (Kipp & Stüeken, 2017;Reinhard et al. 2017;Canfield et al. 2020;Guilbaud et al. 2020).The P/Fe values observed in the Chilpi BIF are similar to those estimated for older deep seawaters and lower than those for Phanerozoic shallow seawaters (Planavsky et al. 2010;Rudmin et al. 2019;Tang et al. 2022).If mid-Proterozoic shallow seawaters had persistently low concentrations of phosphorus, it could have led to a reduction in primary productivity (Crockford et al. 2018;Shi et al. 2021).This, in turn, could have resulted in a low burial of organic matter and potentially low levels of atmospheric oxygen during the mid-Proterozoic (Planavsky et al. 2014).3), showing the position of the iron-rich rock samples of the Chilpi Group and secular trend (this work).

Phosphorous concentration in Palaeoproterozoic seawater palaeoproductivity
The sulphur (S) content of the studied samples varies between 0.01 and 0.31 % (average 0.08 %), much lower than a typical euxinic condition (Yang et al. 2010).A suboxic to anoxic condition of shallow sea with an oxygen level equivalent to 10 -3 to 10 -5 times the present atmospheric level (PAL) was reported for the BIF horizons in the lower part of the Chilpi Group (Mohanty & Mishra, 2023) and 10 -3 PAL for the carbonates in the upper part of the succession (Mishra & Mohanty, 2021).
Generally, in modern iron oxide-rich chemical sediments the P/Fe ratios typically remain constant or decrease during early diagenesis.However, in Precambrian iron oxide-rich rocks, the P/Fe ratios do not show a consistent diagenetic trend, but rather appear to reflect changes in marine phosphate concentrations (Poulton & Canfield, 2006).Based on available evidence, it appears that microbially driven ferric iron reduction is unlikely to increase P/Fe ratios in sediments.Rather, the anoxic environment in the basin of deposition played a significant role in the formation of the BIFs and low productivity in the basin (Li et al. 2020;Khaled et al. 2022).Therefore, the availability of phosphorus in the Chilpi Group of India may be linked to Archaean style of depositional conditions and precipitation of precursor greenalite materials associated with the BIF (cf.Rasmussen et al. 2021).
It is possible that the combination of low phosphorus concentration and anoxic environments during the mid-Proterozoic may have hindered the evolution and growth of eukaryotes, as phosphorus is an indispensable element for sustenance and growth of life (Shi et al. 2021).In addition, the availability of phosphorus has played a critical role in the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis, contributing towards the evolution of the Earth's oxygen.Without sufficient phosphorus, photosynthetic organisms could not produce enough oxygen to support aerobic life.With limited access to this essential nutrient, the growth and development of eukaryotes could have been stunted.Considering the fact that the phosphorus concentration shows high heterogeneity (Benitez-Nelson, 2000;Li et al. 2020) and the Chilpi basin was very small more research is required to further ascertain the atmospheric condition and P concentration towards the late Palaeoproterozoic shallow seawater.

Conclusions
This study encompasses the molar P/Fe ratios of banded iron formation from the Chilpi Group, Bastar Craton, Central India.The bulk rock P/Fe molar ratio of the Chilpi BIF varies between 0.11 and 1.17 with an average of 0.51 ± 0.3 and EPMA spot analysis of P/Fe molar ratio in iron oxide phases is 0.32 ± 0.4.The low P/Fe molar ratio observed in the samples cannot be ascribed to contamination from terrestrial input, diagenetic alterations or high-temperature hydrothermal fluids; the low ratio provides indication for phosphorus-lean seawater having suboxic to anoxic (non-euxinic) conditions with low atmospheric oxygen level similar to that of Archaean Era.A combined analysis of the P/Fe ratio from other areas is indicative of low concentration (< 0.12 μM) of phosphorus in the shallow marine environment of the Chilpi Group.This study bolsters the idea that the low level of phosphorus concentrations in seawater during the late Palaeoproterozoic Era was a consequence of the low primary production resulting from the low level of atmospheric oxygen, which might have impeded the evolution of eukaryotes.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(Colour online) Generalized geological maps.(a) Map of the Bastar Craton with the distribution of sedimentary basins and relationship with the Sausar Mobile Belt (after Mohanty & Mishra, 2023).Details of the framed area (marked as Figure 1(b)) are shown in Figure 1(b).Notes: 1.The zone north of the Central Indian Shear is known as the Central Indian Tectonic Zone. 2. Some of the older units have younger age range than the younger units because of the presence of undifferentiated younger components.(b) Map of the central part of the Chilpi Basin, showing the distribution of different stratigraphic units and sample locations (modified after Mishra & Mohanty, 2021; Mohanty & Mishra, 2023).Inset: Outline map of India showing five Archean cratonic nuclei (mauve; BC: Bastar Craton, BKC: Bundelkhand Craton, DC: Dharwar Craton, SC: Singhbhum Craton and WIC: Western Indian Craton), Palaeoproterozoic-Mesoproterozoic orogenic belts (pale orange; AMB: Aravalli Mountain Belt; SMB: Satpura Mountain Belt; CGC: Chhotanagpur Gneiss Complex), Mesoproterozoic-Neoproterozoic orogenic belts (yellowish green; EGB: Eastern Ghats Belt; SGT: Southern Granulite Terrain), Palaeoproterozoic-Neoproterozoic sedimentary basins (yellow), Gondwana Grabens (bright blue), Deccan Traps (green) and Mesozoic-Cenozoic sedimentary basins (grey).Framed rectangle shows the position of Figure 1(a).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (Colour online) Photographs showing different characters of iron-rich units of the Chilpi Group.(a) Alternate hematite and jasper mesobands in the BHJQ unit, (b) botryoidal/pisolitic texture of the iron formation, (c) iron-rich and iron-poor bands showing gradational contact, disruption and presence of chamosite/greenalite-rich band (green unit in the lower part), (d) alternate bands of hematite and silicates minerals (greenish-brown chamosite/greenalite/cronstedtite) in combined transmitted and reflected light, (e) oolitic texture in iron-rich rocks containing chamosite/greenalite oolites with magnetite-hematite borders in reflected light, (f) euhedral magnetite showing replacement by hematite at the peripheral part, and oolitic chamosite/greenalite in reflected light.(Note: Chm -Chamosite, Hem -Hematite, Mag -Magnetite).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (Colour online) Plots to characterize the environment of deposition of iron-rich rocks of the study area (from Mohanty & Mishra, 2023): (a) PAAS normalized REEþY patterns of different facies of the studied samples compared with different fluids, (b) ratio plots of Sm/Yb and Eu/Sm to distinguish different mixing trends, (c) ratio plots of Y/Ho and Eu/Sm to identify fluid mixing patterns, and (d) cross-plot of PAAS normalized MREE enrichment and P to evaluate the effect of diagenesis on phosphate deposition/leaching.The fields of modern seawater and high-temperature hydrothermal fluids and the mixing curve with the estimated proportion of mixing are adopted from Alexander et al. (2008).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (Colour online) Cross-plots showing the relationship between (a) P 2 O 5 and TOC, (b) Ba/Al ratio and TOC, (c) P and Fe and (d) P 1 and P/Fe 100 molar ratio.Purple coloured markers in (c) and (d) are used for 9 samples having TOC data and other coloured markers represent different iron-rich facies having same annotation as in Figure 4. Negligible correlations suggest no effect of the organic matter on the palaeo-productivity indices in the Chilpi Group.Good correlation between P 1 and P/Fe 100 molar ratio and a low correlation between P and Fe content indicate Fe-redox as a contributory factor for P enrichment.
1696 PK Mishra et al. is indicative of minimal diagenetic effects (discussed earlier in the section 5.2) and a P d release.Therefore, during the deposition of the Chilpi BIF, the seawater phosphorus concentrations were possibly lower than those in the modern deep ocean having average phosphorous concentration of ~2.3 μM (Jones et al. 2015).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(Colour online) Secular variation of P/Fe molar ratio normalized as percentage of iron (data adopted from Planavsky et al. 2010; Tang et al. 2022 and references therein; Table3), showing the position of the iron-rich rock samples of the Chilpi Group and secular trend (this work).

Table 1 .
(Konhauser et al. 2007mingsson et al. 2018)010;Jones et al. 2015)and estimated P content for two different silica activities in the studied iron-rich rocks.P 1 = P concentration (μM) at a [Si] = 0.67 mM, and P 2 = P concentration (μM) at a [Si] = 0 mM The molar P/Fe ratios of iron oxide-rich chemical sediments were utilized to evaluate P concentration in palaeo-seawater (e.g.Bjerrum & Canfield, 2002;Planavsky et al. 2010;Jones et al. 2015).The removal/sorption of P from solution can be calculated by the equation:K D ¼ ½P Fe =ð½P d ½FeÞwhere K D is distribution coefficient/sorption constant, [P d ] is dissolved concentration of phosphorus, [P Fe ] is concentration of phosphorus in the iron precipitate, and [Fe] is concentration of iron precipitate(Jones et al. 2015;Hemmingsson et al. 2018).The value of K D changes in relation to the composition of the solution, particularly the concentrations of silicon ion(Konhauser et al. 2007) and divalent cations (Mg 2þ , Ca 2þ ) in seawater(Jones et al.

Table 2 .
Elemental composition (in wt%) of iron oxide phases determined by EPMA analysis, selected element ratios and estimated P content for two different silica activities in the studied iron-rich rocks.P 1 = P concentration (μM) at a [Si] = 0.67 mM; P 2 = P concentration (μM) at a [Si] = 0 mM

Table 3 .
Bulk rock major element composition of some of the worldwide BIF deposits of Archean and Proterozoic Eons, considered for calculation of phosphorus concentration.P 1 = P concentration (μM) at a [Si] = 0.67 mM; P 2 = P concentration (μM) at a [Si] = 0 mM