Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T02:26:14.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variability studies of physico-chemical properties of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) using a scoringtechnique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2013

Get access

Abstract

Introduction. India is the largest producer of pomegranate in the world, with rich genetic diversity. The wide range of utility of pomegranate in human health, nutrition and livelihood security has triggered its heavy demand in India and other countries. At present, more than 300 germplasm accessions from indigenous and exotic sources are available in India, but meagre information on the physico-chemical properties of their fruits is available. In our study, the physico-chemical properties of varieties grown under a semi-arid climate were investigated. Materials and methods. Our study was carried out at the experimental farm of the National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, India, during the harvests of 2008–2009 and 2009–2010. Twenty pomegranate varieties were studied with respect to the physico-chemical properties of their fruits. Results and discussion. A considerable variation (coefficient of variation: 3.37% to 101.13%) was observed with respect to the 16 characters studied. The values ranged from 12.64 °Brix to 15.39 °Brix for TSS; 0.38% to 3.40% for acidity; 16.67 g to 27.82 g for 100-aril weight; 4.31-38.62 for the maturity index; 59.22% to 77.40% for aril percentage; and 43.30% to 61.00% for juice percentage. Fruit size, rind weight, total aril weight, 100-aril weight, juice weight and aril width were found to have a strong positive correlation (P < 0.01) with fruit weight. Based on the total index score obtained, the varieties ‘Bassein Seedless’, ‘Dholka’, ‘Ganesh’, ‘Jyoti’, ‘Kandhari’, ‘KRS’, ‘Mridula’ and ‘P-13’ were found to be suitable for processing and table purposes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2013 Cirad/EDP Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gozlekci, S., Ercusli, S., Okturen, F., Sonmez, S., Physico-chemical characteristics at three development stages in pomegranate cv. Hicaznar, Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 39 (1) (2011) 241245.Google Scholar
Levin G.M., Pomegranate, Third Millenn. Publ., East Libra Drive Tempe, AZ, U.S.A., 2006.
Jalikop, S.H., Linked dominant alleles or inter-locus interaction results in a major shift in pomegranate fruit acidity of Ganesh × Kabul Yellow, Euphytica 158 (2007) 201207. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tehranifar, A., Zarei, M., Esfanidiyari, B., Nemati, Z., Physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of pomegranate fruit (Punica granatum L.) of different cultivars grown in Iran, Hortic. Env. Biotech. 51 (2010) 573579.Google Scholar
Seeram N.P., Zhang Y., Reed J.D., Krueger C.G., Vaya J., Pomegranate phytochemicals, in: Seeram N.P., Schullman R.N., Heber D. (Eds.), Pomegranates: Ancient roots to modern medicine, CRC Press Taylor Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fla., U.S.A., 2006.
Viuda-Martos, M., Fernandez-Lopez, J., Perez-Alvarez, J.A., Pomegranate and its many functional components as related to human health: a review, Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 9 (2010) 635654. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, M.G., Neves, M.A., Antunes, M.D., Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.): A medicinal plant with myriad biological properties – a short review, J. Med. Plant Res. 4 (25) (2010) 28362847.Google Scholar
Jadhav, V.T., Sharma, J., Pomegranate cultivation is very promising, Indian Hortic. 52 (2007) 3031.Google Scholar
Chandra, R., Jadhav, V.T., Sharma, J., Global scenario of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) culture with special reference to India, Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotech. 4 (2) (2010) 718. Google Scholar
Heshi, A.B., Garande, V.K., Wagh, A.N., Katore, H.S., Effect of pre-harvest sprays of chemicals on the quality of pomegranate fruit (Punica granatum L.) cv. G-137, Agric. Sci. Digest. 21 (2001) 2527. Google Scholar
Jalikop, S.H., Rawal, R.D., Kumar, R., Exploitation of sub-temperate pomegranate Daru in breeding tropical varieties, Acta Hortic. (ISHS) 696 (2005) 107112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D.B., Kingsly, A.R.P., Effect of drying on quality of anardana, Indian J. Hortic. 65 (2008) 413416. Google Scholar
Khodade, M.S., Wavhal, K.N., Kale, P.N., Physicochemical changes during growth and development of pomegranate, Indian J. Hortic. 47 (1990) 2127.Google Scholar
Chandra R., Kumar P., Jadhav V.T., Dhinesh Babu. K., Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), in: Peter K.V. (Ed.), Biodiversity in horticultural crops, Daya Publ. House, New-Delhi, India, 2011.
Ranganna S., Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products, 2nd ed., Tata McGraw-Hill, New-Delhi, India, 2001.
Tehranifar, A., Zarei, M., Nemati, Z., Esfandiyari, B., Vazifeshenas, M.R., Investigation of physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of twenty Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars, Sci. Hortic. 126 (2010) 180185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A., Statistical procedure for agricultural research, 2nd ed., John Wiley Sons Inc., N.Y., U.S.A., 1983.
Singh, D.B., Screening of pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars for arid ecosystem, Indian J. Agric. Sci. 74 (11) (2005) 604606.Google Scholar
Samadia, D.K., Pareek, O.P., Fruit quality improvement in pomegranate under hot arid environment, Indian J. Hortic. 63 (2006) 126132.Google Scholar
Meena, K.K., Singh,, R., Correlation and path coefficient studies in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) germplasm, Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 16 (2) (2003)135137.Google Scholar
Shulman, Y., Fainbertein, L., Lavee, S., Pomegranate fruit development and maturation, J. Hortic. Sci. 48 (1984) 293296.Google Scholar
Mir, M.M., Sofi, A.A., Singh, D.B., Khan, F.U., Evaluation of pomegranate cultivars under temperate conditions of Kashmir valley, Indian J. Hortic. 64 (2007) 150154.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.J., Melgarejo, P., Hernandez, F., Salazar, D.M., Martinez, R., Seed characterization of five new pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties, Sci. Hortic. 110 (2006) 241246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahid, A., Khodayar, H., Mehdi, S., Physical and chemical properties of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit in maturation stage, Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 6 (2009) 411416.Google Scholar
Ram, A., Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., Growing pomegranate in Punjab successfully, Indian Hortic. 52 (2007) 911. Google Scholar
Viswanath P., Al-Bakri A.N., Nadaf S.K., Amal K., Correlations and variability in fruit characters of pomegranate, in: Faroda A.S., Joshi N.L., Kathju S. (Eds.), Proc. Symp. Recent advances in management of arid ecosystem, CAZRI, India, 1997, pp. 361–364.
Sarkhosh, A., Zamani, Z., Fatahi, R., Ranjbar, H., Evaluation of genetic diversity among Iranian soft-seeded pomegranate accessions by fruit characteristics and RAPD markers, Sci. Hortic. 121 (2009) 313319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manera, F.J., Legua, P., Melgarejo, P., Martinez, R., Martinez, J.J., Harnandez, F., Effect of air temperature on rind colour development in pomegranate, Sci. Hortic. 134 (2012) 245247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cam, M., Hisil, Y., Durmaz, D., Characterization of pomegranate juices from ten cultivars grown in Turkey, Int. J. Food Prop. 12 (2009) 388395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadavi, A., Barzegar, M., Azizi, M.H., Bayat, M., Physicochemical composition of 10 pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) grown in Iran, Food Sci. Technol. Int. 11 (2005) 113119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sistrunk W.A., Moore J.N., Quality, in: Moore J.N., Janick J. (Eds.), Methods in fruit breeding, Purdu Univ., Indiana, U.S.A., 1986.