Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:10:21.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the Commission to the Mission Model: Technology Czars and the Indian Middle Class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2017

Itty Abraham
Itty Abraham*
Affiliation:
Itty Abraham (seaai@nus.edu.sg) is Associate Professor in the Department of Southeast Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore.
Get access

Abstract

This article identifies a major transformation in India's approach to strategic technology development from an earlier Commission model, epitomized by atomic energy, that seeks the enhancement of sovereign power, to a Mission model, epitomized by telecommunications, directed toward the furthering of biopolitical power. It compares five strategic industries in India—atomic energy, space, electronics, biotechnology and telecommunications—and shows that no single factor is responsible for technological success or failure. Outcomes depend on the strength of political networks, the structure and maturity of the industry, the extent of bureaucratic resistance, and the technological strategy adopted. This finding contests the widely held perspective that success in strategic technology development is the product of the extraordinary efforts of a single individual, a technology “czar,” and explains the persistence of this narrative by highlighting the role of technoscience in mediating a highly ambivalent relation between the Indian middle class and the state.

Keywords

atomic energybiotechnologyelectronicsM.G.K. Menonmission modelPitrodaPushpa Bhargavaspacetechnology czartelecom
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , August 2017 , pp. 675 - 696
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Abraham, Itty. 1992. “India's ‘Strategic Enclave’: Civilian Scientists and Military Technologies.” Armed Forces & Society 18(2):231–52.Google Scholar
Abraham, Itty. 1998. Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: Science, Secrecy and the Postcolonial State. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Abraham, Itty. 2009. “Contra-Proliferation: Interpreting India's Nuclear Tests in 1974 and 1998.” In Inside Nuclear South Asia, ed. Sagan, Scott, 106–36. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Abraham, Itty. 2014. How India Became Territorial: Foreign Policy, Diaspora, Geopolitics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Abraham, Itty, and Rajadhyaksha, Ashish. 2015. “State Power and Technological Citizenship in India: From the Postcolonial to the Digital Age.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 9(1):65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adas, Michael. 1990. Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Robert S. 2010. Nucleus and Nation: Scientists, International Networks, and Power in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baskaran, Angathevar. 2005. “From Space to Commerce: The Evolution of Space Development Policy and Technology Accumulation in India.” Technology in Society 27(2):155–79.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi. 1989. “Note on the Organisation of Nuclear Energy.” Nuclear India 26:3–5.Google Scholar
Bhargava, Pushpa M. 1985. “A Note on the National Biotechnology Programme.” Correspondence File. Hyderabad: P. M. Bhargava Foundation.Google Scholar
Bhargava, Pushpa M. 1986. “P. M. Bhargava to Rajiv Gandhi.” March 5. Bio/Conf/PMB. Correspondence File. Hyderabad: P. M. Bhargava Foundation.Google Scholar
Bhargava, Pushpa M. 2009. “Biotechnology In India: The Beginnings.” Biotechnology Journal 4(3):313–18.Google Scholar
Chadarevian, Soraya de. 2002. Designs for Life: Molecular Biology After World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chengappa, Raj. 2000. Weapons of Peace: The Secret Story of India's Quest to Be a Nuclear Power. Delhi: HarperCollins Publishers India.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, Indira, and Dasgupta, Ananya. 2010. A Masterful Spirit: Homi J. Bhabha, 1909–1966. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cushman, Robert E. 1939. “The Constitutional Status of the Independent Regulatory Commissions.” Cornell Law Review 24(2):163–97.Google Scholar
Dandekar, V. M. 1972. “Report of the Committee on Automation.” New Delhi: Ministry of Labour and Rehabilitation.Google Scholar
Dickson, David. 1988. The New Politics of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David. 2007. The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Leela. 2006. India's New Middle Class: Democratic Politics in an Era of Economic Reform. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Flank, Steven M. 1993. “Reconstructing Rockets: The Politics of Developing Military Technology in Brazil, India, and Israel.” PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. “What Is an Author?” In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, ed. Bouchard, Donald F.. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
“Guha Research Conference: A Brief Report of Its Genesis, Objectives, and Activities.” 1982. GRC Folder. Hyderabad: P.M. Bhargava Foundation.Google Scholar
Hamied, Y. K. 2005. “Indian Pharma Industry: Decades of Struggle and Achievements.” Presented at “On the Occasion of Dr. A.V. Rama Rao's 70th Birthday,” Hyderabad, April 2. www.arvindguptatoys.com/arvindgupta/avra-hamied.pdf (accessed April 22, 2017).Google Scholar
Kalam, Avul Pakir Jainulabdeen Abdul, and Tiwari, Arun. 1999. Wings of Fire: An Autobiography. Hyderabad: Universities Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2006. “Politics of Economic Growth in India, 1980–2005: Part I: The 1980s.” Economic and Political Weekly 41(14):1251–59.Google Scholar
Krishna, Sankaran. 2006. “The Bomb, Biography and the Indian Middle Class.” Economic and Political Weekly 41(23):2327–31.Google Scholar
Krishna, V. V. 1996. “Science, Technology and Policy Changes in India.” Science Technology & Society 1(1):129–44.Google Scholar
Menon, M. G. K. 2011. “Homi Bhabha and Self Reliance in Electronics and Information Technology.” In Homi Bhabha and the Computer Revolution, eds. Shyamasundar, R. K. and Pai, M. A., 107–18. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
National Biotechnology Board. 1983. “National Biotechnology Board and Its Committees.” Department of Science and Technology. Hyderabad: P.M. Bhargava Foundation.Google Scholar
Nayar, Baldev Raj. 1983. India's Quest for Technological Independence: Volume I: Policy Foundation and Policy Change. Delhi: Lancers Publishers.Google Scholar
Parthasarathi, Ashok. 2007. Technology at the Core: Science and Technology with Indira Gandhi. Delhi: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Phalkey, Jahnavi. 2013. Atomic State: Big Science in Twentieth-Century India. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Pitroda, Sam, and Pitke, M. V.. 2011. “Homi Bhabha's Role in Fostering Electronics Development: C-DOT and C-DAC.” In Homi Bhabha and the Computer Revolution, eds. Shyamasundar, R. K. and Pai, M. A., 128–48. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, David C. 1996. India's Political Administrators: From ICS to IAS. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramana, M. V. 2011. The Power of Promise: Examining Nuclear Power in India. Delhi: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Ramanna, Raja. 1991. Years of Pilgrimage, an Autobiography. Delhi: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 2009. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Amrita. 2007. Vikram Sarabhai: A Life. Delhi: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
Sharma, Dinesh C. 2009. The Long Revolution: The Birth and Growth of India's IT Industry. Noida: HarperCollins Publishers India.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Asif A. 2015. “Science, Geography, and Nation: The Global Creation of Thumba.” History and Technology 31(4):420–51.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 1999. Leapfrogging Development?: The Political Economy of Telecommunications Restructuring. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Spangenberg, Bradford. 1976. British Bureaucracy in India: Status, Policy, and the ICS in the Late 19th Century. Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
Subramanian, C. R. 1992. India and the Computer: A Study of Planned Development. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Walter. 1961. Assault on the Unknown: The International Geophysical Year. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Times of India . 2011. “Delhi Metro Overcrowding to Ease by May.” January 19. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Delhi-Metro-overcrowding-to-ease-by-May/articleshow/7316482.cms (accessed April 22, 2017).Google Scholar
Tyabji, Nasir. 2012. “Negotiating Nonalignment: Dilemmas Attendant on Initiating Pharmaceutical Production in India.” Technology and Culture 53(1):37–60.Google Scholar
Varadarajan, Latha. 2010. The Domestic Abroad: Diasporas in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Venkateswaran, A. L. 1967. Defense Organisation in India. Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.Google Scholar
Wright, Susan. 1986. “Molecular Biology or Molecular Politics? The Production of Scientific Consensus on the Hazards of Recombinant DNA Technology.” Social Studies of Science 16(4):593–620.Google Scholar
Zaheer, S. Husain. 1960. “Comments on Dr. C.V. Ramakrishna's Note.” Hyderabad: P.M. Bhargava Foundation.Google Scholar