Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:07:39.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Mapping and measuring social capital through assessment of collective action to conserve and develop watersheds in Rajasthan, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Anirudh Krishna
Affiliation:
Teacher Public policy and political science departments, Duke University
Norman Uphoff
Affiliation:
Director of the Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture, and Development and Professor of Government and International Agriculture Cornell University
Christiaan Grootaert
Affiliation:
The World Bank
Thierry van Bastelaer
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

Social capital is a popular current concept in the development literature and in development agencies. But is it real enough to be measured in the field and validated by achievement of desired outcomes of development programs? Is it something that can be purposefully increased? This chapter reports on the observed relationships between social capital measures and development outcomes in sixty-four villages in the Indian State of Rajasthan. Since 1991 these villages have participated in a watershed conservation and development program funded by the Indian government and the World Bank. The villages provide an empirical basis for evaluating whether social capital can be identified and measured quantitatively.

The database includes interviews with 2,397 individuals, split about evenly between men and women; sixty-four focus group sessions with village leaders and elected representatives; and relevant village- and household-level data obtained from official records. By classifying the villages' performance in restoring their degraded or vulnerable common lands through collective action as having been high, medium, or low, we assess whether certain social-structural or cognitive variables associated with social capital can explain differences in the measured manifestations of mutually beneficial collective action – the benefit flow we associate with and expect to observe from the asset of social capital.

We find that an index of social capital variables is positively and consistently correlated with superior development outcomes, both in watershed conservation and in cooperative development activities more generally.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Role of Social Capital in Development
An Empirical Assessment
, pp. 85 - 124
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G. and Verba, S., 1989. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. London: Sage
Baviskar, B. S. and Attwood, D. W., 1995. Finding the Middle Path: The Political Economy of Cooperation in Rural India. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications
Brara, R., 1991. “Are Grazing Lands ‘Wastelands’? Some Evidence from Rajasthan.” Economic and Political Weekly, February 22. Bombay
Coleman, J. S., 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Drèze, J. and Sen, A., 1995. India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Esman, M. J. and Uphoff, N., 1984. Local Organizations: Intermediaries in Rural Development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Grootaert, C., 1999. “Social Capital, Household Welfare, and Poverty in Indonesia.” Local Level Institutions Working Paper 6. World Bank, Social Development Department, Washington, DC
Hardin, R., 1982. Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Hirschman, A. O., 1984. Getting Ahead Collectively: Grassroots Experiences in Latin America. New York: Pergamon Press
Jackman, R. W. and Miller, R. A., 1998. “Social Capital and Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 1, 47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodha, N. S., 1990. “Common Property Resources: Contributions and Crisis.” Economic and Political Weekly, June 30. Bombay
Johnston, B. F. and Clark, W. C., 1982. Redesigning Rural Development: A Strategic Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Kaviraj, S. (ed.), 1997. Politics in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press
Knight, J., 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Krishna, A., 1997. “Participatory Watershed Development and Soil Conservation in Rajasthan, India.” In A. Krishna, N. T. Uphoff, and M. J. Esman (eds.), Reasons for Hope: Instructive Experiences in Rural Development, 255–272. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press
Krishna, A. 2000a. “Creating and Harnessing Social Capital.” In P. Dasgupta and I. Serageldin (eds.), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, 71–93. Washington, DC: World Bank
Krishna, A. 2000b. “Social Capital, Collective Action, and the State: Understanding Economic Development and Democratic Governance in Rural North India.” PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Department of Government, Ithaca, NY
Krishna, A., Uphoff, N. T. and Esman, M. J. (eds.), 1997. Reasons for Hope: Instructive Experiences in Rural Development. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press
Lipset, S. M., 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Doubleday
Lipset, S. M. 1994. “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited.” American Sociological Review 59: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, D. and Pritchett, L., 1997. “Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania.” Policy Research Working Paper 1796. World Bank, Social Development Department and Development Research Group, Washington, DC
Olson, M., 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Putnam, R. D., 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Rajasthan Agricultural University, 1993. Baseline Survey Report. Udaipur: College of Technology and Agricultural Engineering, Rajasthan Agricultural University
Rose, R., 1999. “What Does Social Capital Add to Individual Welfare?” Social Capital Initiative Working Paper 15. World Bank, Social Development Department, Washington, DC
Schneider, M., Teske, P., Marschall, M., Mintrom, M., and Roch, C., 1997. “Institutional Arrangements and the Creation of Social Capital: The Effects of Public School Choice.” American Political Science Review 91: 82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schomer, K., Erdman, J. L., Oldrick, D. O., and Rudolph, L. I., 1994. The Idea of Rajasthan: Explorations in Regional Identity, vol. Ⅱ: Institutions. Delhi: Manohar Publishers
Srinivas, M. N., 1987. “The Indian Village: Myth and Reality.” In M. N. Srinivas, The Dominant Caste and Other Essays, 20–59. Delhi: Oxford University Press
Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M. S., 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Uphoff, N., 1996. Learning from Gal Oya: Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science. London: Intermediate Technology Publications
Uphoff, N. 2000. “Understanding Social Capital: Learning from the Analysis and Experience of Participation.” In P. Dasgupta and I. Serageldin (eds.), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, 215–249. Washington, DC: World Bank
Uphoff, N. and Wijayaratna, C. M., 1997. “Farmer Organization in Sri Lanka: Improving Irrigation Management in Sri Lanka.” In A. Krishna, N. T. Uphoff, and M. J. Esman (eds.), Reasons for Hope: Instructive Experiences in Rural Development, 166–183. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press
Uphoff, N. and Wijayaratna, C. M. 2000. “Demonstrated Benefits from Social Capital: The Productivity of Farmer Organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka.” World Development 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, R., 1994. Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies
Woolcock, M., 1998. “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework.” Theory and Society 27, 151–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×