Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:28:47.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Putting the informed into consent

information and decision-making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Deborah Bowman
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
John Spicer
Affiliation:
University of London
Rehana Iqbal
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter will explore the element of consent that is probably most familiar to readers: information. The term ‘informed consent’ is commonplace (and sometimes afforded legal meaning that it does not have in the UK). Even if someone is not well-versed in the finer details of consent, it is likely that the vast majority of people understand that for consent to be meaningful there must be some sort of exchange of information. It is rare, in either our professional or personal lives, that we are content to agree blindly to a proposal without first finding out more and perhaps exploring the options in greater detail. It is a natural human instinct to seek information to help in making choices and taking decisions. The questions relating to sharing information have formed a significant part of the common law (or cases) that exist about consent and also the guidance on consent that is published by professional bodies such as the General Medical Council (GMC) and Royal Colleges. An appreciation of the role of information is central both to a sound understanding of the concept of consent and its effective enactment in the clinical environment.

This chapter of the book will explore, in detail and with clinical examples, what it means to seek and obtain consent that is properly informed. The chapter aims to move beyond the somewhat mechanistic notion of ‘information transfer’ to consider why information is considered an important element of meaningful consent, what constitutes information, who might be responsible for sharing information with a patient (or potential patient) and how the requirement that consent should be informed can be best managed in the day-to-day demands of a busy clinical practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Informed Consent
A Primer for Clinical Practice
, pp. 32 - 55
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2008 Consent: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions TogetherLondonGeneral Medical Council
For an excellent analysis of how a narrative-based approach to ethics might inform the seeking and obtaining of consentMcMillan, J.Gillett, G. 2002 Fulford, K. W. M.Dickenson, D.Murray, T. H.Healthcare Ethics and Human ValuesOxfordBlackwellGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L.Childress, J. F. 2008 Principles of Biomedical EthicsOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
For a discussion of patient views about the value of informationManson, N. 2010 J Med Ethics 36 834CrossRef
Department of Health 2009 Reference Guide on Consent to Examination and TreatmentLondonHMSOGoogle Scholar
General Medical Council 2008 Consent Guidance: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions TogetherLondonGeneral Medical CouncilGoogle Scholar
See also Department of Health 2009 Reference Guide for Consent to Examination or TreatmentLondonDepartment of HealthGoogle Scholar
See General Medical Council 2009 The New DoctorLondonGeneral Medical CouncilGoogle Scholar
Read, K.Shah, S. 2010 Obtaining Informed Consent by Doctors in TrainingCambridge, UKEast of England DeaneryGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. M. 1986 Soc Sci Med 22 29CrossRef
Teuten, B.Taylor, D. 2001 Br J Ophthalmol 85 894CrossRef
Akkad, A.Jackson, C.Kenyon, S.Dixon-Woods, M.Taub, N.Habiba, M. 2004 Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire studyBr J Obstet Gynaecol 111 1133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, O. A.Wearne, M. J. 2007 J R Soc Med 100 97
Ritchie, R.Reynard, J. 2008 J R Soc Med 101 48CrossRef
Reference Guide for Consent to Examination and Treatment 2009 LondonHMSO
For thoughtful accounts of what such an approach might mean in clinical practiceGilmartin, J.Wright, K. 2008 J Clin Nurs 17 2418CrossRef
Lockey, J.Ul-Hassan, M. 2009 Holistic approach to pre-operative assessment for cataract patients. Br J Nurs 18 326
Davis, M. 2005 Nurs Times 101 30
Lockey, J. 2009 Br J Nurs1207CrossRef
Pearson, A.Richardson, M.Cairns, M. 2004 J Ambul Surg 11 49CrossRef
Improving Endoscopy Services: Meeting the ChallengesLondonNHS Modernisation Agency 2004
Elliott, R. A.Payne, K.Moore, J. K. 2003 Anaesthesia 58 412CrossRefPubMed
Forster, A. J.LaBranche, R.McKim, R. 2008 Am J Managed Care 14 429
Law, T. T.Suen, D. T. K. 2009 Hong Kong Med J 15 179
Flanagan, J. 2009 AORN J 90 41CrossRef
Gilmartin, J.Wright, K. 2007 Int Nurs Rev 54 183CrossRef
Dartey, W.Borase, H.Organ, A.Evans, T.Fox, R. 2010 J Obstet Gynaecol 30 166CrossRef
General Medical Council 2008 Consent: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions TogetherLondonGeneral MedicalGoogle Scholar
Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee 1957 1 582
Stacey, M. 1995 Hunt, G.Whistleblowing in the Health Service: Accountability, Law and Professional Practice35LondonEdward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Samanta, A.Samanta, J. 2003 Bolam 3 443PubMed
Teff, H. 1998 Oxf J Le Stud 18 473CrossRef
Brazier, M.Miola, J. 2000 Med Law Rev 8 85CrossRef
Khan, M. 2001 Bolitho 20 483PubMed
McHale, J. 2002 Qual Saf Health Care 11 88CrossRefPubMed
Fox, R. 1957 Merton, R.Reader, G.Kendall, P.The Student PhysicianCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Fox, R. 2002 Bendelow, G.Carpenter, M.Vautier, C.Williams, S.Gender, Health and Healing: The Public/Private DivideLondonRoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, K. 1996 ‘Don’t think zebras’Theor Med Bioeth 17 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melzer, D.Hogarth, S.Liddell, K. 2008 BMJ 336 590CrossRef
2007
Parker, M.Lucassen, A. 2003 J Med Ethics 29 70CrossRef
Parker, M.Lucassen, A. 2004 BMJ 239 165CrossRef
Offit, K.Groeger, E.Turner, S.Wadsworth, E. A.Weiser, M. A. 2004 JAMA 292 1469CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×