Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T14:50:56.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The syllable in Slavic: form and function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

Christina Y. Bethin
Affiliation:
State University of New York
Get access

Summary

Background

Slavists agree that the syllable played a major role in the history of the Slavic languages and there are various principles, tendencies, and laws to explain how sound change related to syllable structure in Common Slavic. But our understanding of the syllable in Slavic is still fairly rudimentary. After Leskien (1909: 52ff.) observed that several developments in Proto- and Common Slavic had the effect of converting closed syllables to open ones, Iljinskij (1916, 1926) associated the loss of final consonants, the simplification of consonant clusters, the monophthongization of diphthongs, the changes in liquid diphthongs, and the creation of nasal vowels and syllabic liquids with a “law of open syllables.” By formulating this “law” as a “principle of rising sonority,” van Wijk (1931) was able to include the prothesis of glides among the series of innovations consistent with a certain syllable type. Other changes, including palatalization and vowel fronting, seemed to produce a similarity between sounds within a syllable and in 1929 Jakobson extended our understanding of the syllable as a phonological domain by referring to these changes as being consistent with a “tendency for syllable synharmony.” Slavists since then have viewed the development of Common Slavic from Proto-Indo-European (PIE) as governed by open syllable structure or rising sonority, and syllable synharmony. It is also widely claimed that the loss of certain vowels (jers) in Late Common Slavic (LCS) thoroughly restructured the phonological system of Slavic, creating newly closed syllables.

Type
Chapter
Information
Slavic Prosody
Language Change and Phonological Theory
, pp. 12 - 111
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×