Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:02:49.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the intake and utilization of wet feed by calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. J. Fitzgerald  and
M. Kay
J. J. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksbum, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
M. Kay
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksbum, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Summary

A latin square design with three periods of 3 weeks was used to measure the dry-matter intake, live-weight gain and water intake of 12 British Friesian calves offered an all-concentrate diet ad libitumin wet form. The diets contained 30% (B), 20% (C) or 15% (D) dry matter. A further six calves were given the same diet in dry form (A) throughout the experimental period. Digestibility and nitrogen balance were measured on four calves on each treatment at the end of the experimental period. In addition, two Ayrshire calves, each fitted with a permanent abomasal cannula, were used to study the site of digestion of the feed when given in dry or wet form.

The mean dry-matter intakes of the calves given the dry and wet feeds were 75·5 and 80·8 g/kg W0·75 per day respectively and mean daily live-weight gains were 849 g for the calves on both types of feed. The mean dry-matter intakes of the calves given the wet diets were 80·9 (B), 81·2 (C) and 75·5 (D) g/kg W0·75 per day, and the live-weight gains (g/day) were 857 (B), 879 (C) and 812 (D). None of these differences were significant. The intake of water by the calves was significantly increased by reducing the dry-matter content of the diet. The form or dry-matter content of the diet offered had no effect on the digestibility of dry matter (76·1%), organic matter (77·9%), energy (75·8%) or crude protein (75·8%) or on nitrogen retention (32·5% of N intake).

The rumen was the main site of digestion for all Tour diets and an average of only 7% of dietary starch passed undigested through the abomasum.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 149 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1961. The utilization of the energy of food by ruminants. In 2nd Symposium on Energy Metabolism, EAAP. Publ. No. 10.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1962. The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. Hutchinson and Co Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Braude, R. and Rowell, J. G. 1967. Comparison of dry and wet feeding of growing pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Balch, C. C. 1961. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of feed by cows. 1. Preliminary observations on the effect on the voluntary intake of hay of changes in the amount of the reticulo-ruminal contents. Br. J. Nutr. 15: 523–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. and Boyne, A. W. 1970. The use of automation in deter-mining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, with final calculation by computer. Analyst, Lond. 95: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. J. and Walker, N. 1968. The utilisation of wet feed by bacon pigs with special reference to pipe-line feeding. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, D., Lassiter, C. A., Huffman, C. F. and Duncan, C. W. 1958. Effect of all hay vs all-silage rations on dry matter intake of Iactating dairy cows; moisture and pH as factors affecting appetite. J. Dairy Sci. 41: 720 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Huber, J. T., Natrajan, S. and Polan, C. E. 1967. Adaptation to starch in steers fed by nipple pail. J. Dairy Sci. 50: 1161–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, M. R., Little, G. O. and Mitchell, G. E. Jr 1966. Starch disappearance from different segments of the digestive tract of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 25; 652–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, C. O., Mitchell, G. E. Jr and Reitnour, C. M. 1968. Post-ruminal digestion of corn starch in steers. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 790–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. and Armstrong, D. G. 1968. Enzyme method for determination of a-linked glucose polymers in biological materials. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 19: 578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieson, J. 1970. The automated estimation of chromic oxide. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 29: 30A.Google Scholar
Moore, L. A., Thomas, J. W. and Sykes, J. F. 1960. The acceptability of grass/legumes silage by dairy cattle. Proc. 8th int. Grassld Congr., Reading, p. 701.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Benzie, D. and KAY, R. N. B.1970. The effects of feeding procedure on closure of the oesophageal groove in young sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 24: 785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. and Corse, E. L. 1970. The effect on protein utilization of feeding different protein supplements via the rumen or via the abomasum in young growing sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 24: 803–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. and Kay, R. N. B. 1969. Dietary factors influencing the digestion of starch in the rumen and small and large intestine of early weaned lambs. Br. J. Nutr. 23: 217–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, A. M. and Robinson, K. L. 1961. Comparative effects of wet and dry feeding on the utilisation of protein by calves. Nature, Land. 192: 1256–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renton, A. R. and Forbes, T. J. 1973. The utilization by beef cattle of a cereal supplement given in liquid suspension or in the dry form. Anim. Prod. 16: 173–177.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. E. and Clare, N. T. 1963. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 6: 121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B., Goodall, E., Whitelaw, F. G. and Reid, R. S. 1968. Digestion of concentrates and of hay diets in the stomach and intestines of ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 22: 281–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, R. E., Mitchell, G. E. Jr and Little, C. O. 1968. Ruminal and postruminal starch digestion in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 824–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed