Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:06:55.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the ease of handling and flight distance of Bos indicus, Bos taurus and their crossbreds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. D. Kabuga  and
P. Appiah
J. D. Kabuga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
P. Appiah
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Get access

Abstract

Ease of handling (time to enter and exit scales and dip, and temperament scores) and flight distance were studied in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle and their crossbreds. At one research station (LS), 20 cows and 20 female calves, each of N'dama and West African Shorthorn (WASH) cattle were used. At another research station (BRS), 15 cows each of N'dama, Holstein and their crossbreds (NH) were used for the study. In addition a further 20 cows and 20 female calves of the N'dama breed were studied at BRS for comparison with the N'dama at LS. There were no significant differences in ease of handling and flight distance between N'dama and WASH and between N'dama at LS and at BRS. There were significant differences between N'dama, Holstein and NH cows in ease of handling and flight distance. Cows took a shorter time to enter but generally a longer time to exit a scale, had a shorter flight distance and a lower temperament score (P < 0·01) than calves.

Keywords

cattletemperament
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 309 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ewbank, R. 1961. The behaviour of cattle in crushes. Veterinary Record 73: 853–856.Google Scholar
Hinch, G. N. and Lynch, J. J. 1987. A note on the effect of castration on the ease of movement and handling of young cattle in yards. Animal Production 45: 317–320.Google Scholar
Kabuga, J. D., Gari-Kwaku, J. and Annor, S. Y. 1991. Social status and its relationships to maintenance behaviour in a herd of N'dama and West African Shorthorn cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science In press.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. M., Duarte, F. A. M. and Penedo, M. C. T. 1980. Approachability of bovine cattle in pastures: breed comparisons and a breed × treatment analysis. Behaviour Genetics 10: 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and procedures in statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tulloh, N. H. 1961. The behaviour of cattle in yards. II. A study of temperament. Animal Behaviour 9: 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderwert, W., Berger, L. L., McKeith, F. K., Baker, A. M., Gonyou, H. W. and Bechtel, P. J. 1985. Influence of seranol implants on growth, behaviour and carcass traits in Angus and Limousin bulls and steers. Journal of Animal Science 61: 310–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed