Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:35:17.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heat-tolerance studies of fat-tailed sheep in the subtropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. S. E. Hafez ,
A. L. Badreldin  and
M. A. Sharafeldin
E. S. E. Hafez
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cairo, Egypt
A. L. Badreldin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cairo, Egypt
M. A. Sharafeldin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cairo, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Forty adult (15 months old) fat-tailed Egyptian rams and ewes of the Rahmani and Ossimi breeds were available at the Animal Breeding Research Farm, Giza, Egypt (30° N.). Body temperature and respiration rates were measured twice weekly throughout the year 1953–4. On days of observations, four readings were taken at 10 a.m., 12 noon, 2 p.m. and 4 p.m. Skin temperature was measured once weekly at noon for nine body regions, using a precision bridge thermometer. The effects of docking and pregnancy were also studied.

1. There were seasonal variations in body temperature and respiration rate. The maximum values were during summer and the minimum during winter. The seasonal rate of change was greater in respiration rate than in body temperature.

2. Body temperature was 39·1 and 39·0° C. for the Ossimi rams and ewes respectively, while it was 38·9° C. for both Rahmani sexes. Respiration rate per minute was 42·0, 39·3, for Ossimi rams and ewes and 38·2 and 35·9 for Rahmani rams and ewes respectively. Body temperature and respiration rate were higher in the Ossimi than in the Rahmani breed, and in the males than in the females. Breed differences may be related to anatomical differences such as body conformation, size of skull and tail, thickness of skin and subcutaneous fat and differences in coat characteristics. Sex differences may be associated with the live weight of the animals as well as differences in the hormonal system.

3. Pregnancy had no effect on body temperature and respiration rate in either breed.

4. Different experimental groups reacted similarly with respect to diurnal variations in body temperature and respiration rate; the lowest values being at 10 a.m. and the highest at 4 p.m. Maximum body temperature and respiration rate preceded maximum environmental temperature by 2–4 hr. The diurnal rate of change in respiration rate was higher than that in body temperature. The diurnal changes in body temperature and respiration rate of animals were mainly due to the changes in the environmental temperature throughout the day.

5. (a) Skin temperature varied from 33·7 to 39·7° C., according to season and body region. Seasonal variations in skin temperature of different body regions showed the same trend.

(b) Highest skin temperatures were recorded for middle and upper fat tail, back thoracic and middle scrotum regions, while the lowest were recorded in lower and upper scrotum, lower tail and neck ventral regions. The breast region had an intermediate skin temperature. The different skin temperatures were due to anatomical differences such as the thickness of subcutaneous fat, density of covering wool or to differences in the amount of blood supply.

6. Docked rams had a lower skin temperature and respiration rate than controls, denoting better heat regulation. This may be due to metabolic differences or anatomical changes in the body such as the thickness of subcutaneous fat.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , May 1956 , pp. 280 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Badreldin, A. L. & Ghany, M. A. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badreldin, A. L., Oloufa, M. M. & El-Labban, F. M. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, no. 3.Google Scholar
Bonsma, J. C. (1940). Fmg. S. Afr. 15, 373.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. Reinhold Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Brody, S., Worstell, D. M., Ragsdale, A. C. & Kibler, H. H. (1948). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 412.Google Scholar
Clawson, A. B. (1928). Amer. J. Physiol. 85 (2); 251.Google Scholar
Dempsey, E. W. & Astwood, E. B. (1943). Endocrinology, 32, 809.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. D. (1950). Bull. Hannah Dairy Inst. no. 9.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. L. & Reid, G. R. (1953). Bull. Miss. Agric. Exp. Sta.Google Scholar
French, M. H. (1946). East Afr. Agr. J. No. 11, 181.Google Scholar
Gaalaas, R. F. (1945). J. Dairy Sci. 28, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaalaas, R. F. (1947). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E., Badreldin, A. L. & Darwish, Y. H. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 238.Google Scholar
Heitman, H., Hughes, E. H. & Kelly, C. F. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 907.Google Scholar
Kammlade, W. G. (1947). Sheep Science. Chicago: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Kibler, H. H., Brody, S. & Worstell, D. M. (1949). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 435.Google Scholar
Kriss, M. (1921). J. Agr. Res. 21, 1. (Cited by Findlay, 1950.)Google Scholar
Lee, D. H. K. (1950). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1, 200.Google Scholar
Lee, D. H. K. & Robinson, K. W. (1941). Proc. Soc. Queensland, 53, 189. (Cited by Findlay, J. D., 1950.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. C. & Monge, L. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moule, G. R. & Knapp, B. (1950). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1, 456.Google Scholar
Quinlan, J. & Riemerschmid, G. (1941). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 16, 299.Google Scholar
Regan, W. M. & Richardson, G. A. (1938). J. Dairy Sci. 21, 73.Google Scholar
Skohorodjko, A. K., Sipov, A. A. & Subina, N. I. (1946). Trud. velogodsk, Moloc. Inst. 7, 165. (Cited by Findlay & Yang, 1950.)Google Scholar
Thompson, H. J., Worstell, D. M. & Brody, S. (1952). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 189.Google Scholar