Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:38:41.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the properties of new zealand butterfat: VI. Comparison of the properties and vitamin A potencies of butterfats produced by clover-fed and ryegrass-fed dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

F. H. McDowall
Affiliation:
The Dairy Research Institute (N.Z.), Palmerston North, New Zealand
W. A. McGillivray
Affiliation:
The Dairy Research Institute (N.Z.), Palmerston North, New Zealand

Summary

In an indoor feeding trial with three sets of monozygotic twin cows during late spring the effects of H1 short rotation ryegrass and white clover as feeds for the cows on the characteristics and the carotene and vitamin A contents of the butterfat were compared. The butterfat from the cows fed ryegrass had a lower iodine value and refractive index, higher Reichert and saponification values, and lower carotene and vitamin A contents than the butterfat from the cows fed clover. The carotene and vitamin A contents of the blood of the cows fed ryegrass were also lower than those of the cows fed clover

In a subsequent outdoor feeding trial with four sets of monozygotic twins the feeding of pure H1 short rotation ryegrass or of perennial ryegrass was compared with the feeding of mixed pastures containing a high but varying proportion of clover. The results for the spring and early summer months were similar in direction but smaller in magnitude than those from the indoor feeding trial. In the result for the autumn months there was a reversal of the relationship for the characteristics and the carotene and vitamin A contents of the butterfat and for the carotenoid contents of the blood.

It is suggested that the lack of consistency between the spring and autumn results could have been due to differences in the stage of growth of the ryegrass fed and that butterfat characteristics may be influenced more by the stage of maturity than by the botanical composition of the pasture.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cox, G. A. & McDowall, F. H. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 377.Google Scholar
McDowall, F. H. (1962). J. Dairy Res. 29, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowall, F. H., McGillivray, W. A. & Hawke, J. C. (1961). Nature, Lond., 91, 303.Google Scholar
McDowall, F. H. & Patchell, R. M. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, A. K. R. & McDowall, F. H. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 119.Google Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. (1956). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A38, 466.Google Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. (1957 a). J. Dairy Res. 24, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. (1957 b). J. Dairy Res. 24, 95.Google Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. (1961). World Review Nutrition and Dietetics, p. 135. London: Pitman Medical Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Sears, P. D., Goodall, V. C. & Newbold, R. P. (1942; 1948). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A24, 36; A30, 231.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. Y., Ganguly, J. & Kon, S. K. (1949). Brit. J. Nutr. 3, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worker, N. A. (1957; 1958). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 8, 442; 9, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worker, N. A. & McGillivray, W. A. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar