Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:02:18.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shell gland and egg-shell formation in Fasciola hepatica L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. K. Yosufzai
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Queen's University of Belfast

Extract

1. The shell gland of Fasciola hepatica produces an extremely hyaline secretion. The egg-shell is formed from the hyaline secretion.

2. As the eggs travel through the uterus, the shell is temporarily reinforced from the inside by vitelline granules. The vitelline granules are released when the vitelline cells enter the vitelline reservoir.

3. Views regarding the nomenclature of the shell gland are discussed.

4. The presence of an elliptical chamber in the shell gland is described. In this chamber, oocytes, vitelline granules and vitelline cells are mixed together, and here the secretion of the shell gland is released and the egg-shell is formed.

5. The arrangement of the cellular constituents within the egg is effected by the elliptical chamber.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M. G. (1935). Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 54, 271.Google Scholar
Augustine, D. L. (1929). Animal Parasitology. New York.Google Scholar
Blumberg, C. (1871). Inaug. Diss. Dorpat. (Not obtainable in original.)Google Scholar
Cable, R. M. (1931). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 74, 563.Google Scholar
Dawes, B. (1940). Parasitology, 32, 287.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. (1909). Zool. Anz. 34, 481.Google Scholar
Henneguy, L. F. (1902). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 134, 1235.Google Scholar
Henneguy, L. F. (1906). Arch. Anat. micr. 9, 47.Google Scholar
Idris Jones, E. (1933). Parasitology, 24, 545.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. J. (1912). Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 37, 285.Google Scholar
Kouri, P., Basnuevo, J., Alvaré, L., Lescano, O. & Simon, R. (1936). Rev. Parasit., Habana, 2, 173.Google Scholar
Kouri, P. & Nauss, R. W. (1938). J. Parasit. 24, 291.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1886). 2. Aufl. 1., 3. Lief., 2. Abteil, 1.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. (18861901). Die menschlichen Parasiten, 2nd ed.Leipzig.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1885). Z. wiss. Zool. 41, 390.Google Scholar
Macé, E. (1882). Recherches anatomiques sur la grande douve du foie. Thèse de médecine. Paris. (Not obtainable.)Google Scholar
Manter, H. W. (1927). J. Parasit. 13, 199.Google Scholar
Markell, E. K. (1943). Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 62, 27.Google Scholar
Murikama, S. (1937). J. Okayama Med. Soc. 49, 706. (German Summary.)Google Scholar
Rees, G. (1939). Parasitology, 32, 417.Google Scholar
Schubmann, W. (1905). Zool. Jb. (Anat.), 21, 571.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1951). Nature, Lond., 168, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, F. (1880). Z. wiss. Zool. 34, 539.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. (1947). Parasitology, 38, 128.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. (1894). J. Comp. Med. 15, 225.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1943). Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 85, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. L. (1934). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 27, 499.Google Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. (1918). J. Med. Res. (N.S.), 38, 267.Google Scholar
Ujiie, N. (1936 a). J. Med. Ass. Formosa, 35, 1010. (English abstract.)Google Scholar
Ujiie, N. (1936 b). J. Med. Ass. Formosa, 35, 1894. (English abstract.)Google Scholar
Willey, C. H. & Koulish, S. (1950). J. Parasit. 36, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmott, S. (1950). J. Helminth. 24, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yosufzai, H. K. (1952 a). Nature, Lond., 169, 549.Google Scholar
Yosufzai, H. K. (1952 b). Cellule, 60, 7.Google Scholar
Yosufzai, H. K. (1953). In the Press.Google Scholar
Yumoto, Y. (1936). J. Med. Ass. Formosa, 35, 1845. (English abstract.)Google Scholar