Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:40:15.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Reciprocal Hybrids of Common Ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, and Giant Ragweed, A. trifida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gilles Vincent ,
Denis Lauzer  and
Mario Cappadocia
Gilles Vincent
Affiliation:
Montreal Botanical Garden, 4101 est. Sherbrooke, Montreal, QC, Canada, H1X 2B2
Denis Lauzer
Affiliation:
Institut botanique, Univ. Montreal, 4101 est. Sherbrooke, Montreal, QC, Canada H1X 2B2
Mario Cappadocia
Affiliation:
Institut botanique, Univ. Montreal, 4101 est. Sherbrooke, Montreal, QC, Canada H1X 2B2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common ragweed (2n=36), giant ragweed (2n = 24), and their reciprocal F1 hybrids (2n = 30) were analyzed for a number of traits. Hybrids of the type giant ragweed♀ × common ragweed♂ were obtained via immature embryo culture. The analyses revealed a surprising contribution of the pollen parent for features such as biomass, leaf area, and specific leaf area. Leaf morphology, however, was similar to the maternal parent. One plant, originating from crosses of the type common ragweed♀ × giant ragweed♂, developed abnormally and cytological analysis revealed the presence of 24 chromosomes in its somatic cells. Probably this plant had an androgenetic origin.

Keywords

Common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. #3 AMBELgiant ragweed, A. trifida L. #AMBTRHay feverhybridizationandrogenetic plantAMBELAMBTR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 1988 , pp. 574 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bassett, I. J. and Crompton, C. W. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. II. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and A. psilostachya DC. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:463–476.Google Scholar
2. Bassett, I. J. and Crompton, C. W. 1982. The biology of Canadian weeds. 55. Ambrosia trifida L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:1003–1010.Google Scholar
3. Cappadocia, M., Cheng, D.S.K., and Ludlum-Simonette, R. 1984. Plant regeneration from in vitro culture of anthers of Solanum chacoense Bitt. and interspecific diploid hybrids S. tuberosum L. × S. chacoense Bitt. Theor. Appl. Genet, 69:139–143.Google Scholar
4. Chase, S. S. 1969. Monoploid-derivatives of maize (Zea mays L.). Bot. Rev. 35:117–167.Google Scholar
5. Garwood, D. L., Weber, E. J., Lambert, R. J., and Alexander, D. E. 1970. Effect of different cytoplasms on oil, fatty acid, plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 10:39–41.Google Scholar
6. Jinks, J. L., Perkins, J. M., and Gregory, S. R. 1972. The analysis and interpretation of differences between reciprocal crosses of Nicotiana rustica varieties. Heredity 28:363–377.Google Scholar
7. Jones, K. L. 1943. Studies on Ambrosia. III. Pistillate Ambrosia elatior × A. trifida and its bearing on matroclinic sex inheritance. Bot. Gaz. 105:226–231.Google Scholar
8. Kermicle, J. L. 1969. Androgenesis conditioned by a mutation in maize. Science 166:1422–1424.Google Scholar
9. Lacadena, J. R. 1974. Spontaneous and induced parthenogenesis and androgenesis. Pages 13–32 in Kasha, K., ed. Haploids in Higher Plants. Advance and Potential. Univ. Guelph Press, Guelph.Google Scholar
10. Nie, N. H., Hull, C., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H. 1975. SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 675 pp.Google Scholar
11. Rouleau, E. 1944. Notes taxonomiques sur la flore phanérogamique du Québec. 1. Naturaliste Can. 71:265–272.Google Scholar
12. Sestak, Z. 1971. Plant Photosynthetic Production: Manual and Methods. The Hague, W. Junk N.V. 818 pp.Google Scholar
13. Vincent, G. and Ahmim, M. 1985. Note sur le comportement de l'Ambrosia artemisiifolia après fauchage. Phytoprotection 66:165–168.Google Scholar
14. Vincent, G. and Cappadocia, M. 1987. Interspecific hybridization between common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and giant ragweed (A. trifida). Weed Sci. 35:633–636.Google Scholar
15. Wagner, W. H. Jr. 1958. The hybrid ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia × trifida . Rhodora 60:309–316.Google Scholar
16. Wiley, R. B. 1915. A hybrid ragweed. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 22:127–128.Google Scholar