Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:25:33.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The gas production capacity of purified chemicals and feedstuffs when incubated in vitro with rumen microbes as a possible indicator of energy availability in the rumen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

A.J. Chamberlain
A.J. Chamberlain*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, PO Box 236, Reading
Get access

Extract

The metabolisable protein system (AFRC, 1992) introduced the term Fermentable Metabolisable Energy (FME) as a measure of the amount of energy that was available in the rumen to support microbial activity. FME is currently derived from theoretical considerations rather than direct measurement; it is on based metabolisable energy (ME) but does not take into account rumen outflow rates and gives limited consideration to the chemical composition of feeds. Gas production from in vitro fermentation of feeds is an indicator of microbial activity which might be a suitable assessment of the rumen available energy content of feeds.

Type
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestion
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972) , Volume 1994 , March 1994 , pp. 91
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AFRC 1992 Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients, Report No. 9. Nutritive requirements of Ruminant Animals: Protein. Nutritional Absracts and Reviews, Series B,; 788–835.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R.L., Lucas, H.L. and Cabera, R. 1969. Energetic relationships in the formulation and utilisation of fermentation end products. In: Phillipson, A. T. (ed.) Physiology of digestion and metabolism in the ruminant. Oriel Press, Newcastle on Tyne, UK. pp 319–334.Google Scholar