Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-23T14:54:57.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross-Functional Coordination, Status–Authority Asymmetry, and Contingent Exploitation of Digital Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2025

Xiao-Yun Xie ,
Chencan Ye ,
Qiongjing Hu ,
Wei He  and
Haibin Dai
Xiao-Yun Xie
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University, China
Chencan Ye
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University, China
Qiongjing Hu*
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University, China
Wei He
Affiliation:
The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
Haibin Dai*
Affiliation:
The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
*
Corresponding author: Qiongjing Hu; Email: qjhu@zju.edu.cn
Haibin Dai; Email: haibindai@zju.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cross-functional coordination is common in contemporary work and requires professionals with different expertise and roles to cooperate to complete tasks. However, conflicts can exist between functions. This study focuses on a specific factor that impedes cross-functional coordination – status–authority asymmetry, where professionals with lower status are assigned functional authority to supervise higher-status professionals and demand their compliance with particular processes or tasks. The existing literature suggests strategies for the low-status group to elicit the high-status group’s compliance; however, neither approach is cost-effective. We identify new opportunities in the digital age and investigate how low-status professionals can utilize digital technology to improve cross-functional coordination. We conducted a 17-month ethnographic study in a Chinese hospital to determine how low-status pharmacists obtain compliance from high-status doctors in the prescription review process. We propose that contingent exploitation (i.e., strategically restricted utilization of digital technology) is an effective strategy to achieve the low-status function’s purposes. Through strategic configuration of process streamlining, knowledge imprinting, and compliance enforcement, the low-status group can exert functional authority without evoking fierce resistance from the high-status group. This study contributes to the literature on cross-functional coordination and extends our understanding of technological adaptation in a cross-functional context.

摘要

摘要

跨职能协调在当代工作中十分常见, 需要具有不同专长和角色的专业人士彼此合作完成任务。然而, 不同职能之间可能存在一定冲突。本研究关注了阻碍跨职能协调的一个因素——地位- 职权不对称, 即地位较低的专业人士被赋予职权来监督地位较高的人员, 并要求其遵守特定流程或任务。现有文献已经讨论了低地位者获取高地位者服从的策略, 但这些策略都需要低地位者付出较大代价且收效不保。我们在数字时代发现了新的机遇, 探讨了低地位专业人士如何利用数字技术改善跨职能协调。我们在中国的一家医院进行了为期17个月的民族志研究, 探讨了低地位的药师如何在处方审核中获取高地位医生的配合。我们提出权变式利用 (即有策略地限制对数字技术的利用), 该策略能够有效实现低地位群体的职能目标。通过对流程优化、知识印记、强制服从等维度进行策略化构型, 低地位群体能够在不引发高地位群体强烈抵制的情况下行使职权。本研究对跨职能协调研究做出了贡献, 并扩展了对跨职能背景下技术适应的理解。

Keywords

cross-functional coordinationethnographyhealthcarestatus–authority asymmetrytechnological adaptation跨职能协调地位-职权不对称技术适应

Information

Type
Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , October 2025 , pp. 864 - 888
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Association for Chinese Management Research.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anthony, C. 2018. To question or accept? How status differences influence responses to new epistemic technologies in knowledge work. Academy of Management Review, 43(4): 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyres, N. S. 1999. The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” bomber. Organization Science, 10(2): 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asthana, S., Jones, R., & Sheaff, R. 2019. Why does the NHS struggle to adopt eHealth innovations? A review of macro, meso and micro factors. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atlassian. 2016. Work life: How the ‘silo effect’ is hurting cross team collaboration. Available from URL: https://www.atlassian.com/blog/teamwork/tips-to-improve-cross-team-collaborationGoogle Scholar
Augustine, G. 2021. We’re not like those crazy hippies: The dynamics of jurisdictional drift in externally mandated occupational groups. Organization Science, 32(4): 1056–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, S., Kessler, I., & Heron, P. 2008. Role redesign in a modernised NHS: The case of health care assistants. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(2): 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, S., Kessler, I., & Heron, P. 2012. Nursing a grievance? The role of healthcare assistants in a modernized national health service. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(2): 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badejo, O., Sagay, H., Abimbola, S., & Van Belle, S. 2020. Confronting power in low places: Historical analysis of medical dominance and role-boundary negotiation between health professions in Nigeria. BMJ -Global Health, 5(9): e003349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bala, H., & Venkatesh, V. 2016. Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Science, 62(1): 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1): 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. 2001. Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1): 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, M., Oborn, E., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. 2012. Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organization Science, 23(5): 1448–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belrhiti, Z., Van Belle, S., & Criel, B. 2021. How medical dominance and interprofessional conflicts undermine patient-centred care in hospitals: Historical analysis and multiple embedded case study in Morocco. BMJ -Global Health, 6(7): e006140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardi, R., & Exworthy, M. 2020. Clinical managers’ identity at the crossroad of multiple institutional logics in it innovation: The case study of a health care organization in England. Information Systems Journal, 30(3): 566–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1968. The hierarchy of authority in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 73(4): 453–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braithwaite, J., Clay-Williams, R., Vecellio, E., Marks, D., Hooper, T., Westbrook, M., Westbrook, J., Blakely, B., & Ludlow, K. 2016. The basis of clinical tribalism, hierarchy and stereotyping: A laboratory-controlled teamwork experiment. BMJ Open, 6(7): e012467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton-Jones, A., & Grange, C. 2013. From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Information Systems Research, 24(3): 632–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carte, T., & Chidambaram, L. 2004. A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams: Leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(11): 448–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Guo, B., Guo, J., & Li, W. H. 2022. Technology decomposition and technology recombination in industrial catch-up for large emerging economies: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries. Management and Organization Review, 18(1): 167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claggett, J. L., & Karahanna, E. 2018. Unpacking the structure of coordination mechanisms and the role of relational coordination in an era of digitally mediated work processes. Academy of Management Review, 43(4): 704–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. R., Clark, S., & Polborn, M. K. 2006. Coordination and status influence. Rationality and Society, 18(3): 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. 1998. ‘Fun’s over. Fact checkers are here’: A case study of institutionalized dissent in the magazine publishing industry. In Wagner, J. A. Ed., Advances in qualitative organizational research: 105–135. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Currie, G., & Burgess, N. 2017. The knowledge brokering role of Middle managers: The case of hybrid Middle managers in a professionalized organization. In Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (Eds.), Handbook of middle management strategy process research, 425–447. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Currie, G., Burgess, N., & Hayton, J. C. 2015. HR practices and knowledge brokering by hybrid middle managers in hospital settings: The influence of professional hierarchy. Human Resource Management, 54(5): 793–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, G., Finn, R., & Martin, G. 2007. Spanning boundaries in pursuit of effective knowledge sharing within networks in the NHS. Journal of Health, Organization and Management, 21(4/5): 406–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. 2012. Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7): 937–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, M. 1950. Conflicts between staff and line managerial officers. American Sociological Review, 15(3): 342–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. J., & Chismar, W. G. 2007. The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: An investigation of computerized physician order entry. MIS Quarterly, 31(4): 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Kwaadsteniet, E. W., & van Dijk, E. 2010. Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3): 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Z. L., Lu, Y. T., Liang, X. J., Zeng, R. F., Li, H. X., Lu, P. P., & Xu, Z. J. 2023. Collaboration between primary care pharmacists and general practitioner teams: Recent developments, challenges and countermeasures. Chinese General Practice, 26(10): 1179–1185. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Denison, D. R., Hart, S. L., & Kahn, J. A. 1996. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 1005–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elston, M. A. 1991. The politics of professional power: Medicine in a changing health service. In Gabe, J., Calnan, M. & Bury, M. (Eds.), The sociology of the health service: 58–88. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flood, A. B., & Scott, W. R. 1978. Professional power and professional effectiveness: The power of the surgical staff and the quality of surgical care in hospitals. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19(3): 240–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, J. R., & Raven, B. 1959. The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power: 150–167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Gauld, R., Asgari-Jirhandeh, N., Patcharanarumol, W., & Tangcharoensathien, V. 2018. Reshaping public hospitals: An agenda for reform in Asia and the Pacific. BMJ -Global Health, 3(6): e001168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ, Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. 1960. Norm commitment and conformity to role-status obligations. American Journal of Sociology, 66(3): 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Shaw, S., Papoutsi, C., Vijayaraghavan, S., & Stones, R. 2019. Infrastructure revisited: An ethnographic case study of how health information infrastructure shapes and constrains technological innovation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(12): e16093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, P. 2005. Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(sup1): 188–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, W., Hu, Y., Yao, D., Xu, J., Dai, Y., & Dai, H. 2024. Building a hospital pharmacist workforce by a diversified and position-oriented learning system. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17: 2989–2997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heldal, F. 2015. Managerial control versus professional autonomy in organizational change: Tearing down the walls and fighting fire with fire. Journal of Change Management, 15(3): 188–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofling, C. K., Brotzman, E., Dalrymple, S., Graves, N., & Pierce, C. M. 1966. An experimental study in nurse-physician relationships. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 143(2): 171–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huising, R. 2015. To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2): 263–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, H., Huang, Y., Xi, X., & Chen, L. 2023. Exploring the training of pharmacists oriented to the demands for clinical pharmacy services: From the perspective of physicians. BMC Medical Education, 23(1): 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karunakaran, A. 2022. Status–authority asymmetry between professions: The case of 911 dispatchers and police officers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(2): 423–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, K. C. 2022. Local adaptation without work intensification: Experimentalist governance of digital technology for mutually beneficial role reconfiguration in organizations. Organization Science, 33(2): 571–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S., & Kraus, M. W. 2008. A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40: 151–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koontz, H., & Weihrich, H. 2012. Essentials of management: An international and leadership perspective, Ninth edition. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S. 2005. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly, 29(3): 461–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leifer, E. M. 1988. Interaction preludes to role setting: Exploratory local action. American Sociological Review, 53(6): 865–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, P. M. 2011. When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Mis Quarterly, 35(1): 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., Cao, M., Sun, J., Jiang, Y., & Liu, Y. 2020. Pharmaceutical care in Chinese public tertiary hospitals: Findings from the 4th National Healthcare Improvement Initiative Survey. Human Resources for Health, 18(1): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J. D. 2012. Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberati, E. G., Gorli, M., & Scaratti, G. 2015. Reorganising hospitals to implement a patient-centered model of care: Effects on clinical practice and professional relationships in the Italian NHS. Journal of Health, Organization and Management, 29(7): 848–873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, G., Chen, X., Zhang, B., Zhao, R., Ao, H., Qu, J., & Zhang, Y. 2023. Construction and development of hospital pharmacy discipline in China. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 58(22): 1993–2015. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Dong, J., & Jiao, H. 2025. Paradoxical tensions, executives’ cognitive frames, and digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Management World, 41(02): 161–181. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Xiao, J., & Sheng, J. 2023. Organizational conflict, power transitions and digital transformation: A longitudinal case study based on Sophia 2014-2021. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 26(11): 39–57. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Luan, K., Hu, Q., & Xie, X. 2017. Status effects on teams. In Salas, E., Rico, R., & Passmore, J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes: 195–217. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & JrBoland, R. J. 2016. Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1): 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. 2008. Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1): 351–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1): 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruping, L. A., & Agarwal, R. 2004. Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6): 975–990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melby, L., & Hellesø, R. 2014. Introducing electronic messaging in Norwegian healthcare: Unintended consequences for interprofessional collaboration. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(5): 343–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. 2006. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7): 941–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevo, S., Nevo, D., & Pinsonneault, A. 2016. A temporally situated self-agency theory of information technology reinvention. Mis Quarterly, 40(1): 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4): 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, V., Jamoom, E., Hsiao, C. J., Furukawa, M. F., & Buntin, M. 2013. Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008–2011. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(7): 957–964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrakaki, D., Klecun, E., & Cornford, T. 2016. Changes in healthcare professional work afforded by technology: The introduction of a national electronic patient record in an English hospital. Organization, 23(2): 206–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, C. L. 1988. Gender differences in task groups: A status and legitimacy account. In JrWebster, M. & Foschi, M. (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research: 188–206. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, L., De Brún, A., Birken, S. A., Davies, C., & McAuliffe, E. 2020. The micropolitics of implementation; A qualitative study exploring the impact of power, authority, and influence when implementing change in healthcare teams. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sætre, A. S., & Van de Ven, A. 2021. Generating theory by abduction. Academy of Management Review, 46(4): 684–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, K., Zmud, R. W., & Browne, G. J. 2006. Managing peer-to-peer conflicts in disruptive information technology innovations: The case of software reuse. MIS Quarterly, 30(2): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. 2012. Routledge international handbook of participatory design. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. C., Bossen, C., & Kanstrup, A. M. 2017. Participatory design in an era of participation. CoDesign, 13(2): 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. 2001. When formality works: Authority and abstraction in law and organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 2004. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Jost, J. T., & Sidanius, J. (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings: 367–390. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Kumar, K., & Chur-Hansen, A. 2021. How pharmacy and medicine students experience the power differential between professions: “Even if the pharmacist knows better, the doctor’s decision goes.” PLoS ONE, 16(8): e0256776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripsas, M. 2009. Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “the digital photography company”. Organization Science, 20(2): 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., Delbecq, A. L., & JrKoenig, R. 1976. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41(2): 322–338.Google Scholar
Wadmann, S., Holm-Petersen, C., & Levay, C. 2019. ‘We don’t like the rules and still we keep seeking new ones’: The vicious circle of quality control in professional organizations. Journal of Professions and Organization, 6(1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1989. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 516–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, D. B. 2011. Code green: Money-driven hospitals and the dismantling of nursing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wicks, D. 1998. Nurses and doctors at work: Rethinking professional boundaries. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Worren, N., & Pope, S. 2024. Connected but conflicted: Separating incompatible roles in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 49(1): 6–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young-Hyman, T. 2017. Cooperating without co-laboring: How formal organizational power moderates cross-functional interaction in project teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1): 179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, X., Kang, Z., Tian, K., Wang, Z., & Huang, Z. 2017. Origin and role evolution of pharmacists and the enlightenment to the legislation of pharmacists law in China. China Pharmacy, 28(35): 4995–4998. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Yu, Z., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z., & Wang, C. 2020. International comparative study on the setting of medical specialty catalogue and countermeasures. Strategic Study of CAE, 22(1): 139–145. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziebland, S., Hyde, E., & Powell, J. 2021. Power, paradox and pessimism: On the unintended consequences of digital health technologies in primary care. Social Science & Medicine, 289: 114419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
处方管理办法 [Prescription Administrative Policy]. 2007. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China [Cited 19 August 2024]. Available from URL: https://www.gov.cn/ziliao/flfg/2007-03/13/content_549406.htmGoogle Scholar