Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T01:05:28.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of the energy values of feedstuffs for broilers using meta-analysis and neural networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

F. C. M. Q. Mariano ,
C. A. Paixão ,
R. R. Lima ,
R. R. Alvarenga ,
P. B. Rodrigues  and
G. A. J. Nascimento
F. C. M. Q. Mariano*
Affiliation:
Department of Exact Science, Federal University of Lavras, PO Box 3037, 37200-000 Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil
C. A. Paixão
Affiliation:
Applied Mathematics School, Getulio Vargas Foundation, 22250-900 Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
R. R. Lima
Affiliation:
Department of Exact Science, Federal University of Lavras, PO Box 3037, 37200-000 Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil
R. R. Alvarenga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, PO Box 3037, 37200-000 Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil
P. B. Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, PO Box 3037, 37200-000 Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil
G. A. J. Nascimento
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceará, PO Box 12168, 60455-970 Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
*
†E-mail: flaviaqz@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Several researchers have developed prediction equations to estimate the metabolisable energy (ME) of energetic and protein concentrate feedstuffs used in diets for broilers. The ME is estimated by considering CP, ether extract, ash and fibre contents. However, the results obtained using traditional regression analysis methods have been inconsistent and new techniques can be used to obtain better estimate of the feedstuffs’ energy value. The objective of this paper was to implement a multilayer perceptron network to estimate the nitrogen-corrected metabolisable energy (AMEn) values of the energetic and protein concentrate feeds, generally used by the poultry feed industry. The concentrate feeds were from plant origin. The dataset contains 568 experimental results, all from Brazil. This dataset was separated into two parts: one part with 454 data, which was used to train, and the other one with 114 data, which was used to evaluate the accuracy of each implemented network. The accuracy of the models was evaluated on the basis of their values of mean squared error, R2, mean absolute deviation, mean absolute percentage error and bias. The 7-5-3-1 model presented the highest accuracy of prediction. It was developed an Excel® AMEn calculator by using the best model, which provides a rapid and efficient way to predict the AMEn values of concentrate feedstuffs for broilers.

Keywords

avian productionbroilersmetabolisable energymultilayer perceptron
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 9 , September 2013 , pp. 1440 - 1445
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmadi, H, Mottaghitalab, M, Nariman-Zadeh, N 2007. Group method of data handling-type neural network prediction of broiler performance based on dietary metabolizable energy, methionine, and lysine. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16, 494–501.Google Scholar
Ahmadi, H, Golian, A, Mottaghitalab, M, Nariman-Zadeh, N 2008. Prediction model for true metabolizable energy of feather meal and poultry offal meal using group method of data handling-type neural network. Poultry Science 87, 1909–1912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albuquerque, VHC, Alexandria, AR, Cortez, PC, Tavares, JMRS 2009. Evaluation of multilayer perceptron and self-organizing map neural network topologies applied on microstructure segmentation from metallographic images. NDT & E International 42, 644–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarenga, RR, Rodrigues, PB, Zangeronimo, MG, Freitas, RTF, Lima, RR, Bertechini, AG, Fassani, EJ 2011. Energetic values of feedstuffs for broilers determined with in vivo assays and prediction equations. Animal Feed Science and Technology 168, 257–266.Google Scholar
Balcean, S, Ooghe, H 2004. Alternative methodologies in studies on business failure: do they produce better results than the classical statistical methods? Working Paper of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium, 40pp.Google Scholar
Bishop, CM 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 482pp.Google Scholar
Bolzan, AC, Machado, RAF, Piaia, JCZ 2008. Egg hatchability prediction by multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 10, 97–102.Google Scholar
Brunelli, SR, Pinheiro, JW, Silva, CA, Fonseca, NAN, Oliveira, DD, Cunha, GE, Souza, LFA 2006. Feeding increasing defatted corn germ meal levels to broiler chickens. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 35, 1349–1358.Google Scholar
Clôba, GM, Clôba, LP, Saliby, E 2002. Cooperação entre redes neurais artificiais e técnicas clássicas para previsão de demanda de uma série de vendas de cerveja na Austrália. Pesquisa Operacional 22, 345–358.Google Scholar
Cybenko, G 1988. Continuos valued neural network with two hidden layers are sufficient. Technical Report, Departament of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Fagard, RH, Staessen, JA, Thijs, L 1996. Advantages and disadvantages of the meta-analysis approach. Journal of Hypertension 14 (suppl. 2), 9–13.Google Scholar
Gheyas, IA, Smith, LS 2011. A novel neural network ensemble architecture for time series forecasting. Neurocomputing 74, 3855–3864.Google Scholar
Haider, A, Hanif, MN 2009. Inflation forecasting in Pakistan using artificial neural networks. Pakistan economic and social review 47, 123–138.Google Scholar
Haykin, S 2007. Neural networks – a comprehensive foundation, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Igel, C, Hüsken, M 2000. Improving the RPROP learning algorithm. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Neural Computing NC 2000, 23–26 May, Berlin, Germany, pp. 115–21.Google Scholar
Lovatto, PA, Lehnen, CR, Andretta, I, Carvalho, AD, Hauschild, L 2007. Meta analysis in scientific research: a methodological approach. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 36 (suppl.), 285–294.Google Scholar
Mariano, FCMQ, Lima, RR, Rodrigues, PB, Alvarenga, RR, Nascimento, GAJ 2012. Prediction equations of energetic values of feedstuffs obtained using meta-analysis and principal components. Ciência Rural 42, 1634–1640.Google Scholar
Moreira, I, Ribeiro, CR, Furlan, AC, Scapinello, C, Kutschenko, M 2002. Utilization of defatted corn germ meal on growing-finishing pigs feeding – digestibility and performance. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 31, 2238–2246.Google Scholar
Nascimento, GAJ, Rodrigues, PB, Freitas, RTF, Allaman, IB, Lima, RR, Reis Neto, RV 2011. Prediction equations to estimate the AMEn values of protein feedstuffs for poultry utilizing meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 40, 2172–2177.Google Scholar
Nascimento, GAJ, Rodrigues, PB, Freitas, RTF, Bertechini, AG, Lima, RR, Pucci, LEA 2009. Prediction equations to estimate the energy values of plant origin concentrate feeds for poultry utilizing the meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 38, 1265–1271.Google Scholar
Okut, H, Gianola, D, Rosa, GJM, Weigel, KA 2011. Prediction of body mass index in mice using dense molecular markers and a regularized neural network. Genetical Research 93, 189–201.Google Scholar
Perai, AH, Moghaddam, HN, Asadpour, S, Bahrampour, J, Mansoori, GH 2010. A comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches for the prediction of true metabolizable energy of meat and bone meal. Poultry Science 89, 1562–1568.Google Scholar
Pereira, BB 1999. Introduction to neural networks in statistics. Center of Multivariate Analysis, Technical Report, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, PB, Rostagno, HS, Albino, LFT, Gomes, PC, Barboza, WA, Santana, RT 2001. Energy values of millet, corn and corn byproducts, determined with broilers and adult cockerels. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 30, 1767–1777.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, DE, Hinton, GE, Williams, RJ 1986. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Paralled distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations (ed. DE Rumelhart and JL McClelland), pp. 318–362. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, AM, Seixas, JM, Pereira, BB, Medronho, RA 2005. Using artificial neural networks and logistic regression in the prediction of Hepatitis A. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia 8, 117–126.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P, Daudin, JJ, St-Pierre, NR 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 1203–1214.Google Scholar
Wan, HF, Chen, W, Qi, ZL, Peng, P, Peng, J 2009. Prediction of true metabolizable energy from chemical composition of wheat milling by-products for ducks. Poultry Science 88, 92–97.Google Scholar
Wijayasekara, D, Manic, M, Sabharwall, P, Utgikar, V 2011. Optimal artificial neural network architecture selection for performance prediction of compact heat exchanger with the EBaLM-OTR technique. Nuclear Engineering and Design 241, 2549–2557.Google Scholar
Zhao, F, Zhang, HF, Hou, SS, Zhang, ZY 2008. Predicting metabolizable energy of normal corn from its chemical composition in adult pekin ducks. Poultry Science 87, 1603–1608.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mariano et al. supplementary material

Supplementary data

Download Mariano et al. supplementary material(File)
File 118.8 KB