Skip to content
Register Sign in Wishlist

Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies


Part of Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy

  • Author: David Kosař, Masarykova Univerzita v Brně, Czech Republic
  • Date Published: April 2016
  • availability: Available
  • format: Hardback
  • isbn: 9781107112124

£ 98.99

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
Paperback, eBook

Looking for an inspection copy?

This title is not currently available on inspection

Product filter button
About the Authors
  • Judicial councils and other judicial self-government bodies have become a worldwide phenomenon. Democracies are increasingly turning to them to insulate the judiciary from the daily politics, enhance independence and ensure judicial accountability. This book investigates the different forms of accountability and the taxonomy of mechanisms of control to determine a best practice methodology. The author expertly provides a meticulous analysis, using over 800 case studies from the Czech and Slovak disciplinary courts from 1993 to 2010 and creates a systematic framework that can be applied to future cases.

    • Expertly combines a deep knowledge of legal doctrine with political science methods
    • Based on robust and verifiable evidence, this is the only scholarly work that tests the effects of a judicial council empirically
    • Challenges the view of judicial accountability as an exclusively positive quality and shows its negative side-effects
    Read more

    Reviews & endorsements

    'Kosař … relies on more than 800 case studies from the Czech and Slovak disciplinary courts from 1993 to 2010 to analyze differing forms of accountability of the least accountable branch of government: the judiciary. The volume's first part lays the theoretical framework that informs the empirical analysis presented in chapters 4 to 7. It defines judicial accountability, describes its mechanisms, and overviews the role of judicial councils in insulating the judiciary from politics, enhancing its independence, and thus ensuring judicial accountability. Chapter 4 comments on the methodology of the empirical research, explaining case selection and case analysis, whereas chapters 5 to 7 compare cases from the Czech and Slovak Republics. The final chapter serves as a conclusion, arguing that the judicial council increases judicial autonomy without necessarily improving the independence of individual judges. Recommended.' L. Stan, Choice

    'Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies serves as a fine cautionary tale about unforeseen consequences and about the perils of sloganizing the sophisticated semantics of constitutionalism and imposing top-down, ready-made policy solutions adopted on the basis of such slogans.' Bogdan Iancu, European Constitutional Law Review

    'Kosař's thoroughly researched book is one of the most comprehensive accounts on judicial accountability written in comparative judicial scholarship, providing a solid basis for further discussions of this concept in academic circles. The book offers a springboard for future analyses on judicial accountability mechanisms and their operation, including their informal dimension, in the post-communist world and beyond.' Raul A. Sanches-Urribarri, I-CONnect (

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity


    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?


    Product details

    • Date Published: April 2016
    • format: Hardback
    • isbn: 9781107112124
    • length: 488 pages
    • dimensions: 229 x 152 x 27 mm
    • weight: 0.82kg
    • contains: 6 b/w illus. 32 tables
    • availability: Available
  • Table of Contents

    Part I. Judicial Accountability: Theoretical Framework:
    1. The concept of judicial accountability
    2. Mechanisms of judicial accountability
    3. Judicial accountability and judicial councils
    Part II. Holding Czech and Slovak Judges Accountable:
    4. Prologue to the case studies: methodology and data reporting
    5. The Czech Republic
    6. Slovakia
    7. Evaluation: the Czech Republic and Slovakia compared
    Part III. Conclusions and Implications:
    8. Judicial accountability and judicial councils: critical appraisal

  • Author

    David Kosař, Masarykova Univerzita v Brně, Czech Republic
    David Kosař is currently Head of the Department of Constitutional Law and Political Science in the Faculty of Law, Universitas Masarykiana Brunensis, Czech Republic. He clerked for a Justice and then the Vice-President of the Supreme Administrative Court, and for a Justice of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic.

Sign In

Please sign in to access your account


Not already registered? Create an account now. ×

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner Please see the permission section of the catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×

Find content that relates to you

Join us online

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.


Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.