The Persistence of Party
Political parties are taken for granted today, but how was the idea of party viewed in the eighteenth century, when core components of modern, representative politics were trialled? From Bolingbroke to Burke, political thinkers regarded party as a fundamental concept of politics, especially in the parliamentary system of Great Britain. The paradox of party was best formulated by David Hume: while parties often threatened the total dissolution of the government, they were also the source of life and vigour in modern politics. In the eighteenth century, party was usually understood as a set of flexible and evolving principles, associated with names and traditions, which categorised and managed political actors, voters, and commentators. Max Skjönsberg thus demonstrates that the idea of party as ideological unity is not purely a nineteenth- or twentieth-century phenomenon but can be traced to the eighteenth century.
- Demonstrates the importance of the concept of party in the eighteenth century, providing a new focus in the history of political thought
- Besides books, pamphlets and newspapers, the books draws extensively on archival sources along with printed and private correspondence
- Brings together political thought and political history
Reviews & endorsements
'The Persistence of Party is an original book. Skjönsberg offers a rich intellectual history revolving around the discussion of party politics in eighteenth-century Britain.' Antong Liu, LSE Review of Books
'The reader of his book learns not only much about neglected figures in the history of the theory of party politics, like Rapin, Brown, and several others whom I have not been able to discuss here, but also much about the ever-changing nature of party politics in Britain during this period, from the start of Whig hegemony in 1714 to the cleavage of the Whig party into Foxites and Pittites in the 1790s. The theoretical point, ... is that the study of the history of political thought sometimes needs to be at the same time study of the details of real-world political practice.' James A. Harris, History of European Ideas
'Max Skjönsberg traces the 18th-century dialogue about this 'enduring and crucial part of British politics' in his outstanding new book, The Persistence of Party.' William Anthony Hay, Law & Liberty
'In The Persistence of Party, Max Skjönsberg proves himself an outstanding guide through this fruitful but complex period … Any student of constitutionalism will benefit from this thorough treatment of a rich period of political history.' John G. Grove, Kirk Center
'Skjönsberg's study … helps us remain alert tothe dangers that lurk if we fail tofind ways to channel party so as to lower, rather thanraise, the temperature. Skjönsberg's title is thus well chosen. Whilst he does notpretend that the eighteenth century will somehow magic up answers for the twenty-first,he rightly encourages us to take on board a key lesson of the eighteenth century: that party will persist.' John G. Grove, Law & Liberty
'At the book's core are rich discussions of printed and archival primary sources … Recommended.' M. G. Spencer, Choice Magazine
'Skjönsberg has produced an important and well-written book. It brings together persuasive readings of the major authors on party in eighteenth-century Britain and roots them in the immediate contexts to which they were responding effectively. It should be required reading for anyone wanting to understand thinking about party in this period.' Andrew C. Thompson, Intellectual History Review
'Max Skjönsberg's informative and engaging new book … addresses the way political thinkers grapple with the perils of partisanship … It is clearly organized, and Skjönsberg presents the arguments crisply and directly. The source base is impressive and includes correspondence and papers alongside the published works. At a time when partisan polarization seems more dangerous than ever, this book provides an illuminating look at the origin of those concerns.' Chris Dudley, Journal of British Studies
'… a reliable history of ideas about party in eighteenth-century Britain.' William Selinger, Eighteenth-Century Studies
'The chapters, harmoniously balanced in their own right, with solid prose and tight conclusions, build out into a fascinating story of concord and discord, true to the productive dysfunction that parties, at their best, represent. The myriad ways of looking at party laid out in this excellent book can only have continued salience, as we continue to puzzle over why we are so polarized - and to ask whether our divisions might, in some ways, be what binds us together.' John Owen Havard, The Scriblerian and the Kit-Cat
Product details
December 2022Paperback
9781108794992
389 pages
227 × 151 × 22 mm
0.57kg
Available
Table of Contents
- Introduction. Party in history and politics
- 1. Background, contexts, and discourses
- 2. Rapin on the origins and nature of party division in Britain
- 3. Bolingbroke's country party opposition platform
- 4. David Hume's early essays on party politics
- 5. Faction detected? Pulteney, Perceval, and the Tories
- 6. Hume on the parties' speculative systems of thought
- 7. Hume and the history of party in England
- 8. Political transformations during the Seven Years' War: Hume and Burke
- 9. 'Not men, but measures': John Brown on free government without faction
- 10. Edmund Burke and the Rockingham Whigs
- 11. Burke's thoughts on the cause of the present discontents
- 12. Burke and his party in the age of revolution
- 13. Burke and the Scottish enlightenment
- Conclusion.