Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more

Recommended product

Popular links

Popular links


Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data

Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data

Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data

Andrew Piper , McGill University, Montréal
November 2020
Available
Paperback
9781108926201

Looking for an inspection copy?

This title is not currently available for inspection.

£18.00
GBP
Paperback
USD
eBook

    This Element tackles the problem of generalization with respect to text-based evidence in the field of literary studies. When working with texts, how can we move, reliably and credibly, from individual observations to more general beliefs about the world? The onset of computational methods has highlighted major shortcomings of traditional approaches to texts when it comes to working with small samples of evidence. This Element combines a machine learning-based approach to detect the prevalence and nature of generalization across tens of thousands of sentences from different disciplines alongside a robust discussion of potential solutions to the problem of the generalizability of textual evidence. It exemplifies the way mixed methods can be used in complementary fashion to develop nuanced, evidence-based arguments about complex disciplinary issues in a data-driven research environment.

    Product details

    September 2020
    Adobe eBook Reader
    9781108912600
    0 pages
    13 b/w illus.
    This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.

    Table of Contents

    • Introduction, or What's Wrong with Literary Studies?
    • Part I. Theory:
    • 1. Probable Cause
    • Part II. Evidence Eve Kraicer, Nicholas King, Emma Ebowe, Matthew Hunter, Victoria Svaikovsky, and Sunyam Bagga
    • 2. Machine Learning as a Collaborative Process
    • 3. Results
    • Part III. Discussion:
    • 4. Don't Generalize (from Case Studies): The Case for Open Generalization
    • 5. Don't Generalize (At All): The Case for the Open Mind
    • Conclusion: On the Mutuality of Method.
      Contributors
    • Eve Kraicer, Nicholas King, Emma Ebowe, Matthew Hunter, Victoria Svaikovsky, Sunyam Bagga, Andrew Piper

    • Author
    • Andrew Piper , McGill University, Montréal

      Andrew Piper is Professor and William Dawson Scholar in the Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill University. He is the director of .txtLAB, a laboratory for cultural analytics, and editor of the Journal of Cultural Analytics. He is also the author of Enumerations: Data and Literary Study (Chicago 2018).