Skip to content
Register Sign in Wishlist

Recalibrating Reform
The Limits of Political Change

AUD$41.95 inc GST

Part of Cambridge Historical Studies in American Law and Society

  • Date Published: March 2017
  • availability: Available
  • format: Paperback
  • isbn: 9781107667389

AUD$ 41.95 inc GST

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
Hardback, eBook

Looking for an inspection copy?

Please email to enquire about an inspection copy of this book

Product filter button
About the Authors
  • Some of the most important eras of reform in US history reveal a troubling pattern: often reform is compromised after the initial legislative and judicial victories have been achieved. Thus Jim Crow racial exclusions followed Reconstruction; employer prerogatives resurged after the passage of the Wagner Act in 1935; and after the civil rights reforms of the mid-twentieth century, principles of color-blindness remain dominant in key areas of constitutional law that allow structural racial inequalities to remain hidden or unaddressed. When momentous reforms occur, certain institutions and legal rights will survive the disruption and remain intact, just in different forms. Thus governance in the post-reform period reflects a systematic recalibration or reshaping of the earlier reforms as a result of the continuing influence and power of such resilient institutions and rights. Recalibrating Reform examines this issue and demonstrates the pivotal role of the Supreme Court in post-reform recalibration.

    • Ambitious theory covering broad sweep of American political history
    • Three historical case studies that focus on dramatic periods of American history, thus accessible to all kinds of history students
    • Large number of Supreme Court cases and opinions; general interest of constitutional law
    Read more

    Reviews & endorsements

    'We celebrate great moments of legal change but fail to pay enough attention to the end of reform. Chinn's superb book challenges us all to rethink how courts apply, adjust, and sometimes frustrate landmark achievements of the people.' Robert L. Tsai, American University, Washington DC

    'A remarkable and highly original book. Looking across the span of American history, Chinn identifies a recurring mismatch between major policy changes and their consequences: transformative legal and political decisions repeatedly result in substantially less-than-transformative governing arrangements. Chinn's innovative analysis will alter how scholars think about patterns of American political development and the significance of judicial power.' Keith J. Bybee, Paul E. and Hon. Joanne F. Alper '72 Judiciary Studies Professor, Syracuse University, New York

    'How do constitutional revolutions end? Chinn puts the spotlight on this much-neglected question and provides a penetrating set of answers that set a new agenda in both law and political science.' Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale University, Connecticut

    'This ambitious book makes a substantial contribution to our understanding of the role of the Supreme Court in American political development. Stuart Chinn has given us our first sustained exploration of the institutional dynamics of retrenchment and accommodation between old and new and conservative and liberal legal-constitutional orders. With great synthetic power and brilliant narrative detail, Chinn shows us how the court recurrently steps in to manage these clashes and fashion the new rules of the game.' William E. Forbath, Lloyd M. Bentsen Chair in Law and Professor of History, University of Texas, Austin

    'Drawing on often opposed theories of judicial behavior and extensive historical research, Recalibrating Reform contends forcefully that judges, even the reform minded, are institutionally conditioned to resist major legal transformations - and so major political transformations. This convincing argument will influence scholars of judicial behavior and American constitutional development for years to come.' Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania

    'Recalibrating Reform is an illuminating work on the role of the US Supreme Court in social change. Stuart Chinn examines the aftermath of reform in the areas of race and labor, arguing that when the court takes up the intersection between new norms and preexisting legal frameworks, it narrows reform to negotiate between prior laws and the new regime. The court's effort to manage legal tension, Chinn argues, limits the possibilities of reform through courts. An original and important contribution.' Mary L. Dudziak, Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law, Emory University, Atlanta

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity


    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?


    Product details

    • Date Published: March 2017
    • format: Paperback
    • isbn: 9781107667389
    • length: 355 pages
    • dimensions: 230 x 153 x 20 mm
    • weight: 0.54kg
    • contains: 28 b/w illus.
    • availability: Available
  • Table of Contents

    Part I. Introduction: Introduction. Reconstructing governance
    1. The theory and political processes of recalibration
    2. The Supreme Court and transformative recalibration
    Part II. Legal Reform and its Delimitation:
    3. Emancipation, the reconstruction era, and delimitation
    4. Labor rights, the new deal era, and delimitation
    5. Constitutional equal protection, the civil rights era, and delimitation
    6. Explaining judicial delimiting behavior
    Part III. The Construction and Maintenance of Governance:
    7. The entrenchment and maintenance of the Jim Crow order
    8. The entrenchment and maintenance of industrial pluralism
    9. The entrenchment and maintenance of the anti-classification order
    10. Explaining order-affirming and tension-managing judicial behavior
    11. Conclusion

  • Author

    Stuart Chinn, University of Oregon
    Stuart Chinn is an assistant professor at the University of Oregon School of Law. He received his BA, PhD (political science) and JD degrees from Yale University, Connecticut. Previously, he was a visiting assistant professor at the University of Texas School of Law. His research and teaching interests are in constitutional law, constitutional theory, legislation, and legal and political history. He has published in the journals Law and Social Inquiry, The Journal of Law, and Polity, and has a book chapter in the edited volume Living Legislation (2012).

Sign In

Please sign in to access your account


Not already registered? Create an account now. ×

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner Please see the permission section of the catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×

Find content that relates to you

Join us online

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.


Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.