‘Minorities and the Making of Postcolonial States in International Law is a groundbreaking work. Shahabuddin skillfully marshals a variety of the most advanced critical methodologies of the past generation to produce an original perspective on some of the central conflicts of our time. His magisterial exposition makes crucial contributions to a number of fields: international law, post-colonialism, ethno-nationalism, state-formation, and global feminism, among others. Moreover, by demonstrating the urgency of bringing these fields together, this book should be indispensable reading for all future work on any of them. Shahabuddin’s case studies - the Rohingya in Myanmar, the Chittagong Hill Tracts people in Bangladesh, and the broad problematics of Indian ethno-nationalism - compellingly reveal the life-and-death issues animating his important work.’ Nathaniel Berman, Brown University

‘Why are postcolonial states more vulnerable to ethnonationalism and the oppression of minorities? While international law’s embedding of this problem in decolonization has been demonstrated in different ways, the point of departure is usually the vision of the state produced by international law. Mohammad Shahabuddin offers a fresh critical perspective by starting instead with nationalist ruling elites. Arguing that they approach the postcolonial state as an ideology of national past, liberal present and developmental future, he then richly shows how international law facilitates each of these elements and the interlocking forms of oppression that they serve to inflict on minorities.’ Karen Knop, University of Toronto

‘This is an outstanding book which combines archival work and history with theoretical innovation and insight to provide a fresh understanding of an enduring and tragic phenomenon, ethnic conflict. What makes this study distinctive and powerful is that its doctrinal analysis is illuminated by historical and sociological studies of nationalism. As a result, the particular case studies explored here have a far-reaching relevance. It is superbly written, and has a special quality of momentum that makes it very readable as the argument unfolds with evidence and research carefully integrated to further the broader movement.’ Antony Anghie, University of Utah and National University of Singapore