Adobe eBook Reader
Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact email@example.com providing details of the course you are teaching.
Carnap, Quine, and Putnam held that in our pursuit of truth we can do no better than to start in the middle, relying on already-established beliefs and inferences and applying our best methods for re-evaluating particular beliefs and inferences and arriving at new ones. In this collection of essays, Gary Ebbs interprets these thinkers' methodological views in the light of their own philosophical commitments, and in the process refutes some widespread misunderstandings of their views, reveals the real strengths of their arguments, and exposes a number of problems that they face. To solve these problems, in many of the essays Ebbs also develops new philosophical approaches, including new theories of logical truth, language use, reference and truth, truth by convention, realism, trans-theoretical terms, agreement and disagreement, radical belief revision, and contextually a priori statements. His essays will be valuable for a wide range of readers in analytic philosophy.Read more
- Presents new interpretations of central views in the history of analytic philosophy in the mid- to late-twentieth century, including Carnap's, Quine's, and Putnam's views of the analytic-synthetic distinction, and compares and evaluates these views
- Reveals the real strengths of Carnap's, Quine's, and Putnam's arguments while debunking widespread misinterpretations of their work
- Addresses central methodological questions from multiple overlapping, but different, perspectives, yielding a new and deeper understanding of the issues, and opening up new avenues of thinking about them
Reviews & endorsements
'Ebbs' volume … is an important publication from both an historical and a systematic point of view. It offers a new perspective on the relation between Carnap, Quine, and Putnam, as well as a substantive contribution to ongoing systematic debates about truth, justification, and language use. As such, it will be of interest and value not only to historians of analytic philosophy, but also to all philosophers who believe that Carnap's, Quine's, and Putnam's most fundamental insights deserve continuous discussion and adaptation.' Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: June 2017
- format: Adobe eBook Reader
- isbn: 9781316836101
- availability: This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.
Table of Contents
Part I. Carnap:
1. Carnap's logical syntax
2. Carnap on ontology
Part II. Carnap and Quine:
3. Carnap and Quine on truth by convention
4. Quine's naturalistic explication of Carnap's logic of science
Part III. Quine:
5. Quine gets the last word
6. Reading Quine's claim that definitional abbreviations create synonymies
7. Can logical truth be defined in purely extensional terms?
8. Reading Quine's claim that no statement is immune to revision
Part IV. Quine and Putnam:
9. Conditionalization and conceptual change: Chalmers in defense of a dogma
10. Truth and trans-theoretical terms: Part V. Putnam:
11. Putnam and the contextually apriori.
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister Sign in
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×