Name: Foro popili
Feature type: name, no symbol
Segment grid: 5B5
Onward stretches:
- XVI? (16?) Cos[..]ianvm
- The linework for this stretch is not marked.
- Notable confusion has occurred here (caused, or made worse for copyists, by the need to straddle adjoining parchments); what there is of the route linework may not be drawn reliably. From BAtlas 45 I infer that the mapmaker made the Foro popili stretch proceed in two directions, moving in one to Cos[..]ianvm (distance figure XVI) and in the other to Vico mendicoleo (no distance figure preserved). On this view, the direct linkage between Cos[..]ianvm and Vico mendicoleo implied by the map is to be regarded as a copyist's slip.
- (no distance figure) Vico mendicoleo
- The linework for this stretch is not marked.
- See note under Foro popili - Cos[..]ianvm stretch.