<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" id="TPPlace3025" type="TPPlaceRecord" n="island">
   <head>Name: <name type="geographic" n="TPFeature" lang="lat" key="TPPlace3025">Crocira Port(vs)</name> (island, no. 
   <seg type="TPRefNum" key="TPPlace3025">53</seg>)</head>
   <ab>Feature type: 
      <seg type="TPFeatureType">island</seg></ab>
   <ab>Segment grid: 
      <seg type="TPGrid">6B2</seg></ab>
   <figure type="inset" href="insetimages/TPPlace3025inset.jpg">
   <head>Color image of immediate environs of Crocira Port(vs)</head></figure>
   <p id="placenote1029">The first word of the name is best seen on the 
      <ref target="TP1888">1888 photograph</ref>. The first "r" and the final "ra" are extremely faint, but not in doubt. 
      <lb/>
      <lb/>If "Ins." ever preceded the name, there is no sign of it. Whether the words "Crocira Port(vs)" are meant to be read as one name, or two, is unclear. If they are quite distinct, then it is curious that "Crocira" is not written horizontally in the regular style, especially when ample space is available. Just conceivably the mapmaker intended the two-word name to signify a settlement on the gulf, and saw no merit in repetitiously naming the island itself. If the single word "Port(vs)" is to be read as a name in its own right here, it would seem to be a unique instance on the map.</p>
   <div id="TPReferences">
      <head>References</head>
      <listBibl>
         <bibl id="citation37321"><title level="m" type="abbreviated">BAtlas</title><biblScope>Corcyra 54 A2</biblScope></bibl>
         <bibl id="citation37322"><title level="m" type="abbreviated">ItMiller</title><biblScope>601, 960</biblScope></bibl>
      </listBibl>
   </div>
   <div id="TP1888">
      <head>Detail from 1888 photograph</head>
      <figure type="inset" href="insetimages1888/TPPlace3025inset-1888.jpg">
      <head>Detail from 1888 photograph</head></figure>
   </div>
</div>