<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" id="TPPlace595" type="TPPlaceRecord" n="name, no symbol">
   <head>Name: <name type="geographic" n="TPFeature" lang="lat" key="TPPlace595">Nemetaco</name></head>
   <ab>Feature type: 
      <seg type="TPFeatureType">name, no symbol</seg></ab>
   <ab>Segment grid: 
      <seg type="TPGrid">1A2</seg></ab>
   <figure type="inset" href="insetimages/TPPlace595inset.jpg">
   <head>Color image of immediate environs of Nemetaco</head></figure>
   <div id="TPStretches">
      <div id="TPOnwardStretches">
         <head>Onward stretches:</head>
         <list type="unordered">
            <item type="TPStretchRecord" id="TPStretch3093">
               <seg type="distance">(no distance figure)</seg><name type="geographic" n="TPFeature" lang="lat" key="TPPlace585">Tvrnaco</name>
               <list type="unordered">
               </list></item>
            <item type="TPStretchRecord" id="TPStretch619">
               <seg type="distance">
               <seg type="distanceRoman" lang="lat">XIIII</seg> (
               <seg type="distanceArabic">14</seg>)</seg><name type="geographic" n="TPFeature" lang="lat" key="TPPlace596">[ - ? - ]araco</name>
               <list type="unordered">
                  <item>The start of this stretch is not marked.</item>
                  <item>One stretch is drawn as two.</item>
                  <item id="stretchnote194">Because there is such a long interval between this name (Nemetaco) and the next ([ - ? - ]araco) on this route, I suspect that a copyist became confused, and so angled the next stretch in the direction of Tvrnaco on the route above. Only after he had drawn it thus did he realize his mistake, and he then extended the (lower) route horizontally towards [ - ? - ]araco instead. In so doing, he created a stretch where (exceptionally) the chicane is drawn up rather than down, and where both name and distance figure are lacking. He also left an apparent route link between Nemetaco and Tvrnaco; this could certainly have been part of the mapmaker's presentation (ItAnt 378,10 includes it), but is no longer very clear to the reader and lacks a distance figure. Miller is among those misled. His lithograph omits the link (ItMiller 27), but in col. 60 he refers forward to it as Strecke 8, only to abandon any such route in col. 75.</item>
               </list></item>
         </list>
      </div>
      <div id="TPPreviousStretches">
         <head>Previous stretch:</head>
         <list type="unordered">
            <item type="TPStretchRecord" id="TPStretch618">
               <seg type="distance">
               <seg type="distanceRoman" lang="lat">XXII</seg> (
               <seg type="distanceArabic">22</seg>)</seg><name type="geographic" n="TPFeature" lang="lat" key="TPPlace594">Tervanna</name></item>
         </list>
      </div>
   </div>
   <div id="TPReferences">
      <head>References</head>
      <listBibl>
         <bibl id="citation31864"><title level="m" type="abbreviated">BAtlas</title><biblScope>Nemetacum 11 C2</biblScope></bibl>
         <bibl id="citation31866"><title level="m" type="abbreviated">ItAnt</title><biblScope>377,8 Nemetacum</biblScope></bibl>
         <bibl id="citation31865"><title level="m" type="abbreviated">ItMiller</title><biblScope>63</biblScope></bibl>
      </listBibl>
   </div>
</div>