Cart

Unlocking potential with the best learning and research solutions

Look Inside Feminist Judgments

Feminist Judgments
Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court

$130.00 (C)

Part of Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions

Editors:
Kathryn M. Stanchi, Temple University, School of Law
Linda L. Berger, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Law
Bridget J. Crawford, Pace University, School of Law

Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger, Bridget J. Crawford, Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol, Kimberly Holst, Phyllis Goldfarb, Andrea Doneff, Pamela Laufer-Ukeles, Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Laura Rosenbury, Inga N. Laurent, Teri McMurtry-Chubb, Nancy D. Polikoff, Karen Syma Czapanskiy, Rachel Rebouché, Kimberly M. Mutcherson, Iselin M. Gambert, Dara E. Purvis, Mayaa Manian, Lucinda M. Finley, Brenda A. Smith, Maria L. Ontiveros, Cassandra Jones Havard, Tracy A. Thomas, Mary Ziegler, Leslie C. Griffin, Margo Kaplan, Cynthia Godsoe, Jamie R. Abrams, Davis S. Cohen, Kristen Konrad Tiscione, Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Deborah Gordon, Deborah L. Rhode, Dale Margolin Cecka, Martha Chamallas, Macarena Sáez, Lisa R. Pruitt, Christine M. Venter, Valorie K. Vojdik, Margaret E. Johnson, Ann C. McGinley, Michelle S. Simon, Ann Bartow, Shaakirrah R. Sanders, Aníbal Rosario Lebrón, Sandra S. Park, Ilene Durst, Kris McDaniel-Miccio, Ruthann Robson, Patricia A. Broussard, Maria Isabel Medina, Erez Aloni, Carlos A. Ball

View all contributors

Date Published: August 2016
availability: Available
format: Hardback
isbn: 9781107126626

Rate & review

$ 130.00 (C)
Hardback

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
Paperback, eBook

Looking for an examination copy?

If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact collegesales@cambridge.org providing details of the course you are teaching.

Description

Contents

Resources

Courses

About the Authors

What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant US Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial diversity on the law as well as the influence of perspective on judging.
- Contains contributions from more than 50 feminist scholars and lawyers, so readers will learn about feminist reasoning from experienced writers and thinkers
- People interested in the Supreme Court, politics, feminism and women's studies will gain from varied and informed perspectives through a feminist lens
Read more
Customer reviews

Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review

Log in to review

Review was not posted due to profanity
×

, create a review

(If you're not , sign out)

Please enter the right captcha value

Please enter a star rating.

Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

How do you rate this item?

Reviews must contain at least 12 words about the product.

×

Product details
- Date Published: August 2016
- format: Hardback
- isbn: 9781107126626
- length: 616 pages
- dimensions: 239 x 154 x 37 mm
- weight: 0.94kg
- availability: Available
Table of Contents
Part I. Introduction and Overview:
1. Introduction to the US Feminist Judgments Project Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger and Bridget J. Crawford
2. Talking back: from feminist history and theory to feminist legal methods and judgments Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol
Part II. The Feminist Judgments:
3. Bradwell v. Illinois, 83 US 130 (1873) Kimberly Holst and Phyllis Goldfarb
4. Muller v. Oregon, 208 US 412 (1908) Andrea Doneff and Pamela Laufer-Ukeles
5. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479 (1965) Cynthia Hawkins DeBose and Laura Rosenbury
6. Loving v. Virginia, 388 US 1 (1967) Inga N. Laurent and Teri McMurtry-Chubb
7. Stanley v. Illinois, 405 US 645 (1972) Nancy D. Polikoff and Karen Syma Czapanskiy
8. Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 (1973) Rachel Rebouché and Kimberly M. Mutcherson
9. Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 US 677 (1973) Iselin M. Gambert and Dara E. Purvis
10. Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 US 484 (1974) Maya Manian and Lucinda M. Finley
11. Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 US 321 (1977) Brenda A. Smith and Maria L. Ontiveros
12. City of Los Angeles Department Dep't of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 US 702 (1978) Cassandra Jones Havard and Tracy A. Thomas
13. Harris v. McRae, 448 US 297 (1980) Mary Ziegler and Leslie C. Griffin
14. Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 US 464 (1981) Margo Kaplan and Cynthia Godsoe
15. Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 US 57 (1981) Jamie R. Abrams and Davis S. Cohen
16. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 US 57 (1986) Kristen Konrad Tiscione and Angela Onwuachi-Willig
17. Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 US 616 (1987) Deborah Gordon and Deborah L. Rhode
18. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 US 228 (1989) Dale Margolin Cecka and Martha Chamallas
19. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 US 833 (1992) Macarena Sáez and Lisa R. Pruitt
20. United States v. Virginia, 518 US 515 (1996) Christine M. Venter and Valorie K. Vojdik
21. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 US 75 (1998) Margaret E. Johnson and Ann C. McGinley
22. Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 524 US 274 (1998) Michelle S. Simon and Ann Bartow
23. United States v. Morrison, 529 US 598 (2000) Shaakirrah R. Sanders and Aníbal Rosario Lebrón
24. Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 (2001) Sandra S. Park and Ilene Durst
25. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 US 558 (2003) Kris McDaniel-Miccio and Ruthann Robson
26. Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 (2005) Patricia A. Broussard and Maria Isabel Medina
27. Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) Erez Aloni and Carlos A. Ball.
Look Inside
Editors
Kathryn M. Stanchi, Temple University, School of Law
Kathryn M. Stanchi is a Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of Women's Studies at the Beasley School of Law, Temple University, Philadelphia.
Linda L. Berger, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Law
Linda L. Berger is a Professor of Law and the Associate Dean for Faculty Development and Research at the Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is also is the President of the Legal Writing Institute and a founder of the peer-reviewed journal Legal Communication and Rhetoric.
Bridget J. Crawford, Pace University, School of Law
Bridget J. Crawford is a Professor of Law at Pace University, New York. She is also an elected member of the American Law Institute and the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel.
Contributors
Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger, Bridget J. Crawford, Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol, Kimberly Holst, Phyllis Goldfarb, Andrea Doneff, Pamela Laufer-Ukeles, Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Laura Rosenbury, Inga N. Laurent, Teri McMurtry-Chubb, Nancy D. Polikoff, Karen Syma Czapanskiy, Rachel Rebouché, Kimberly M. Mutcherson, Iselin M. Gambert, Dara E. Purvis, Mayaa Manian, Lucinda M. Finley, Brenda A. Smith, Maria L. Ontiveros, Cassandra Jones Havard, Tracy A. Thomas, Mary Ziegler, Leslie C. Griffin, Margo Kaplan, Cynthia Godsoe, Jamie R. Abrams, Davis S. Cohen, Kristen Konrad Tiscione, Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Deborah Gordon, Deborah L. Rhode, Dale Margolin Cecka, Martha Chamallas, Macarena Sáez, Lisa R. Pruitt, Christine M. Venter, Valorie K. Vojdik, Margaret E. Johnson, Ann C. McGinley, Michelle S. Simon, Ann Bartow, Shaakirrah R. Sanders, Aníbal Rosario Lebrón, Sandra S. Park, Ilene Durst, Kris McDaniel-Miccio, Ruthann Robson, Patricia A. Broussard, Maria Isabel Medina, Erez Aloni, Carlos A. Ball