Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of contributors
- 1 Introduction: the IEMP model and its critics
- Part I Theory, practice, method
- Part II Types of power
- Part III European exceptionalism?
- 10 From theory to history: ‘The European Dynamic’ or feudalism to capitalism?
- 11 The rise of the West
- 12 A historical, not comparative, method: breakthroughs and limitations in the theory and methodology of Michael Mann's analysis of power
- Part IV Promise and perils of modernity
- Part V Response
- Bibliography of Michael Mann's Writings
- Index
- References
12 - A historical, not comparative, method: breakthroughs and limitations in the theory and methodology of Michael Mann's analysis of power
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of contributors
- 1 Introduction: the IEMP model and its critics
- Part I Theory, practice, method
- Part II Types of power
- Part III European exceptionalism?
- 10 From theory to history: ‘The European Dynamic’ or feudalism to capitalism?
- 11 The rise of the West
- 12 A historical, not comparative, method: breakthroughs and limitations in the theory and methodology of Michael Mann's analysis of power
- Part IV Promise and perils of modernity
- Part V Response
- Bibliography of Michael Mann's Writings
- Index
- References
Summary
Michael Mann's work ranges over such a vast array of periods and places – the prestate peoples of prehistory in the Old and New World; the ancient empires of Egypt, Assyria, Persia, Athens, Hellas, Rome; the varied states of Europe from the Middle Ages to the present; and excursions into India, China and the lands of Islam – that one's first reaction to my title might be: how could anyone claim that Mann's method is not comparative? Let me consult an expert who should know: Michael Mann. On p. 503 of the Sources of Social Power, Volume I (1986), he says: ‘Historical, not comparative, sociology has been my principal method.’ My purpose in this chapter is to explore the implications of this statement. I believe that this approach has allowed Mann to make several major breakthroughs in our understanding of states, their emergence and their development. For this, we will always be in his debt. At the same time, I wish to suggest that the limitations imposed by this choice have also led to problems in his theory of the emergence of the modern world.
Breakthroughs Mann's theory of state formation and development
Mann's theory of state formation and development offers some of the most striking and significant advances since Weber. This advance does not lie in his four-fold typology of power, the now famous IEMP quartet: ideological, economic, military and political power.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- An Anatomy of PowerThe Social Theory of Michael Mann, pp. 263 - 282Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
1976. Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-industrial Europe. Past and Present, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Tools, Instruments, and Engines: Getting a Handle on the Specificity of Engine Science. Social Studies of Science, 31(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1992. Output Growth and the Industrial Revolution: A Restatement of the Crafts–Harley View. Economic History Review, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society 1250–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davids, K. 1995. Shifts of Technological Leadership in Early Modern Europe. In and (eds.), A Miracle Mirrored: The Dutch Republic in European Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000. Dutch Economic Growth in Comparative Historical Perspective, 1500–2000. De Economist, 148(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, M. 1996. Reversal of Fortunes: The Displacement of Cultural Hegemony from the Netherlands to England in the Seventeenth and early Eighteenth Centuries. In and (eds.), The World of William and Mary: Anglo-Dutch Perspectives on the Revolution of 1688–89. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1998. The Pilgrim Art: The Culture of Porcelain in World History. Journal of World History, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Reorient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1987. Cultural Orthodoxy, Risk, and Innovation: The Divergence of East and West in the Early Modern World. Sociological Theory, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Methodological Issues in Comparative Macrosociology. Comparative Social Research, 16.Google Scholar
1998. The Problem of the ‘Early Modern’ World. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. The Rise of the West – or Not? A Revision to Socio-economic History. Sociological Theory, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 2002a. Europe's Peculiar Path: Would the World be ‘Modern’ if William III's Invasion of England in 1688 had Failed? In , and (eds.), Counterfactual History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
2002b. Efflorescences and Economic Growth in World History: Rethinking the ‘Rise of the West’ and the Industrial Revolution. Journal of World History, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 2002c. Comparative-Historical Analysis and Knowledge Accumulation in the Study of Revolutions. In and (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1985. Powers and Liberties: The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 2001. Technical Knowledge and the Mental Universe of Manchester's Early Cotton Manufacturers. Canadian Journal of History, 36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 1998. Revising the Malthusian Narrative: The Comparative Study of Population Dynamics in Late Imperial China. Journal of Asian Studies, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. One Quarter of Humanity: Malthusian Mythology and Chinese Realities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2001. At the Dawn of Modernity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1998. Agricultural Development in Jiangnan, 1620–1850. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malanima, P. 2001. The Energy Basis for Early Modern Growth, 1650–1820. In (ed.), Early Modern Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1984. The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Nature, Causes and Consequences. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. The Sources of Social Power, Volume I: A History from the Beginning to 1760 AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. A. 2000. Modernity and Globalization. Unpublished, given as the Wiles Lectures at Queen's University, Belfast.
2000a. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
2000b. Re-thinking the Late Imperial Chinese Economy: Development, Disaggregation and Decline, circa 1730–1930. Itinerario, 22(3/4).Google Scholar
, and . 1980. The Uses of Comparative History in Macro-social Inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997. China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1967. A Simple Model of London's Importance in Changing English Society and Economy, 1650–1750. Past and Present, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6
- Cited by