Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:15:02.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Ceramics

from Part V - Materials Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2019

Michael P. Richards
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Kate Britton
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

Ceramics are the most abundant surviving material on almost all Neolithic and later archaeological sites. Their abundance and ubiquity is the result of several factors. Firstly, the raw materials that are used to create most ceramics are commonly available in a wide variety of areas. Most require very little in the way of specialised processing. This means that it is generally relatively inexpensive in terms of the time and energy required to gather and process the raw materials to create ceramics. Secondly, they tend to be fragile – if dropped they are easily broken. Thirdly, the broken ceramic sherds cannot easily be reused. Unlike metals, which can be sharpened or remelted, the fate of most broken ceramics is to be discarded. In contrast to the relative fragility of the complete vessel, sherds are remarkably resistant to further degradation in burial and diagenesis. This means that sherds tend to pass relatively unchanged into the hands of the archaeologist, where the reconstruction of the shape and material of the original vessel is possible. Ceramics, therefore, despite their fragility, can be extremely useful, both to the societies who have employed them, usually in great abundance, and to the scientists who study them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Archaeological Science
An Introduction
, pp. 335 - 346
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiran, R. 1970. Ancient Pottery of the Holy Land: From Its Beginnings in the Neolithic Period to the End of the Iron Age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. E. 1985. Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. E. 2008. Social Change and the Evolution of Ceramic Production and Distribution in a Maya Community. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O., Vandermeersch, B., Arensburg, B., Belfer-Cohen, A., Goldberg, P., Laville, H., Meignen, L., Rak, Y., Speth, J. D., Tchernov, E., Tillier, A.-M. and Weiner, S. 1992. The excavations in Kebara Cave, Mt. Carmel. Current Anthropology 33(5):497550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degryse, P. and Braekmans, D. 2014. Elemental and isotopic analysis of ancient ceramics and glass. In: `Cerling, T. (ed.) Treatise of Geochemistry, Vol. 14: Treatise on Geochemistry in Archaeology and Anthropology, pp. 191207. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, I. and Jacobs, L. 1986. Experiments with stone pottery wheel bearings – notes on the use of rotation in the production of ancient pottery. Newsletter. Department of Pottery Technology (University of Leiden) 4:4955.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. and Woods, A. 1997. Prehistoric Pottery for the Archaeologist. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Guzowska, M., Kuleff, I., Pernicka, E. and Satir, M. 2003. On the origin of Coarse Wares of Troia VII. In: `Wagner, G. A., `Pernicka, E. and `Uerpmann, H. P. (ed.) Troia and the Troad, Scientific Approaches, pp. 233249. Berlin-New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Henrickson, R. C. 1994. Continuity and discontinuity in the ceramic tradition of Gordion during the Iron Age. In: `Çilingiroğlu, A. and `French, D. H. (ed.) Anatolian Iron Ages 3, pp. 95129. British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph 16, London.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Josephs, R. L. 2005. Applying micromorphological terminology to ceramic petrology. Geoarchaeology 20(8):861865.Google Scholar
Klein, C. and Hurlbut, C. S. 1998. Manual of Mineralogy. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Knacke-Loy, O., Satir, M. and Pernicka, E. 1995. Zur Herkunftsbestimmung der bronzezeitlichen Keramik von Troia: Chemische und isotopengeochemische (Nd, Sr, Pb) Unterschungen. Studia Troica 5:145175.Google Scholar
Li, B. P., Zhao, J. X., Greig, A., Collerson, K. D., Feng, Y. X., Sun, X. M., Guo, M. S. and Zhuo, Z. X. 2006. Characterisation of Chinese Tang sancai from Gongxian and Yaozhou kilns using ICP-MS trace element and TIMS Sr-Nd isotopic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 33:5662.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, W. S. and Adams, A. E. 1994. A Colour Atlas of Rocks and Minerals in Thin Section. London: Manson Publishing.Google Scholar
Mason, B. and Moore, C. B. 1982. Principles of Geochemistry. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mommsen, H. 2001. Provenance determination of pottery by trace element analysis: Problems, solutions and applications. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 247:657662.Google Scholar
Mommsen, H., Kreuser, A. and Weber, J. 1988. A method for grouping pottery by chemical composition. Archaeometry 30:4757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, L., Burns, A., Bissalputra, T. and Yang, K. C. 1983. The use of an ultra-low viscosity medium (VCD/HXSA) in the rapid embedding of plant cells for electron microscopy. Journal of Microscopy 132:195202.Google Scholar
Orton, C., Tyers, P. and Vince, A. 1993. Pottery in Archaeology: Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peacock, D. P. S. 1970. The scientific analysis of ancient ceramics: A review. World Archaeology 1:375–89.Google Scholar
Peacock, D. P. S. 1977. Pottery and Early Commerce. Characterization and Trade in Roman and Later Ceramics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. M. and Heron, C. 2008. Archaeological Chemistry. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
Reedy, C. L. 2008. Thin-Section Petrography of Stone and Ceramic Cultural Material. London: Archetype Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Rehren, Th. 2003. Crucibles as reaction vessels in ancient metallurgy. In: `Craddock, P. and `Lang, J. (Eds.) Mining and Metal Production through the Ages, pp. 207215. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Renson, V., Coenaerts, J., Nys, K., Mattielli, N., Åström, P., and Claeys, P. 2007. Provenance determination of pottery from Hala Sultan Tekke using lead isotopic analysis: Preliminary results. In: `Åström, P. and `Nys, K. (eds.) Hala Sultan Tekke 12. Tomb 24, Stone Anchors, Faunal Remains and Pottery Provenance, pp. 5360. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 45(12). Sävedalen: Paul Åströms förlag.Google Scholar
Renson, V., Coenaerts, J., Nys, K., Mattielli, N., Vanhaecke, F., Fagels, N. and Claeys, P. 2011. Lead isotopic analysis for the identification of Late Bronze Age pottery from Hala Sultan Tekke (Cyprus). Archaeometry 53:3757.Google Scholar
Rice, P. 1987. Pottery Analysis. A Sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rye, O. S. 1981. Pottery Technology. Principles and Reconstruction. Washington: Taraxacum.Google Scholar
Tite, M. and Kilikoglou, V. 2002. Do we understand cooking pots and is there an ideal cooking pot? In: `Kilikoglou, V., `Hein, A. and `Maniatis, Y. (eds.) Modern Trends in Scientific Studies on Ancient Ceramics, pp. 18. BAR International Series 1011. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Tite, M., Kilikoglou, V. and Vekinis, G. 2001. Strength, toughnes and thermal shock resistance of ancient ceramics, and their influence on technological choice. Archaeometry 43:301324.Google Scholar
Vaughan, S. J. 1995. Ceramic petrology and petrography in the Aegean? American Journal of Archaeology 99(1):115117.Google Scholar
Vandiver, P. B., Soffer, O., Klima, B. and Svoboda, J. 1989. The origins of ceramic technology at Dolni Věstonice, Czechoslovakia. Science 246:10021008.Google Scholar
Velde, B. and Druc, I. C. 1999. Archaeological Ceramic Materials. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Whitbread, I. K. 1995. Greek Transport Amphorae: A Petrological and Archaeological Study. Fitch Laboratory Occasional Paper 4. Athens: British School at Athens.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×