Book contents
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- An Introduction to Body–Machine Intersections
- Part I Blended Bodies
- Part II The Technological Body
- Part III Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body
- Index of Passages
- General Index
- References
Part III - Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023
Book contents
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- An Introduction to Body–Machine Intersections
- Part I Blended Bodies
- Part II The Technological Body
- Part III Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body
- Index of Passages
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity , pp. 179 - 320Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Althoff, J. 1992. Warm, kalt, flüssig und fest bei Aristoteles: Die elementarqualitäten in den zoologischen Schriften (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Barnes, J., ed. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 1-vol. digital edition, Bollingen Series lxxi.2 (Princeton).Google Scholar
Berryman, S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Bremer, D. 1980. ‘Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher’, Poetica, 12: 350–76.Google Scholar
Craddock, P. T. 2008. ‘Mining and Metallurgy’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 93–120.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. 2005. Galeni De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, vol. 2, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum v 4,1,2 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. 2017. ‘Aristotle’s Heart and the Heartless Man’, in Wee, J. Z., ed., The Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman Medicine (Leiden), 122–41.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. 1873 2. The Comparative Anatomy of the Domesticated Animals by A. Chauveau, translated and edited by George Fleming (London).Google Scholar
Gans, C. and Hughes, G. M.. 1967. ‘The Mechanism of Lung Ventilation in the Tortoise Testudo Graeca Linne’, J. Exp. Biol., 47: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, C. R. S. 1973. The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine (Oxford).Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2010. The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2017. ‘Aristotelian Mechanistic Explanation’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World (Cambridge), 125–50.Google Scholar
Korobili, G. 2022. Aristotle. On Youth and Old Age, Life and Death, and Respiration 1–6. With Translation, Introduction and Interpretation (Cham).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mattusch, C. 2008. ‘Metalworking and Tools’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 418–38.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1970. ‘The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing and Breathing’, JHS, 90: 140–79.Google Scholar
Powell, J. U. 1923. ‘The Simile of the Clepsydra in Empedocles’, CQ, 17: 172–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed, M. 2008. ‘De qui la clepsydre est-elle le nom? Une interpretation du fragment 100 d’Empédocle’, REG, 121.2: 443–68.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1955. Aristotle: Parva Naturalia. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1997. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart), 183–208.Google Scholar
Thivel, A. 2005, ‘Air, Pneuma and Breathing from Homer to Hippocrates’, in van der Eijk, P. J., ed., Hippocrates in Context: Papers read at the xith International Hippocrates Colloquium University of Newcastle upon Tyne 27–31 August 2002 (Leiden), 239–49.Google Scholar
Tsaimou, K. G. 1997. Αρχαιογνωσία των μετάλλων: αρχαία μεταλλευτική και μεταλλουργική τεχνική (Athens).Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. 2008. ‘Representations of Technical Processes’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 35–61.Google Scholar
Wee, J. Z. 2017. ‘Earthquake and Epilepsy: The Body Geologic in the Hippocratic Treatise On the Sacred Disease’, in Wee, J. Z., ed., The Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman Medicine (Leiden), 142–67.Google Scholar
Worthen, T. D. 1970. ‘Pneumatic Action in the Klepsydra and Empedocles’ Account of Breathing’, Isis, 61.4: 520–30.Google Scholar
References
Bodnár, I. 2015. “The Problemata physica: An Ιntroduction,” in Mayhew, R., ed., The Aristotelian Problemata physica: Philosophical and Scientific Investigations (Leiden), 1–9.Google Scholar
Bonaventura, F. 1593. Anemologiae pars prior, id est De affectionibus, signis, causisque ventorum ex Aristotele, Theophrasto, ac Ptolomaeo tractatus (Urbino).Google Scholar
Burnikel, W. 1974. Textgeschichtliche Untersuchungen Zu Neun Opuscula Theophrasts (Wiesbaden)Google Scholar
Danker, F. W., ed. 2000. A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (Chicago).Google Scholar
Furlanus, D. 1605. Theophrasti Eresii: Peripateticorum post Aristotelem Principis (Hanover).Google Scholar
Gigon, O. 1937. “Theophrastos Über die Winde, Text, Kommentar und Einleitung.” Diss. University of Basel.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S.. 1996. Greek–English Lexicon. Revised Supplement (Oxford).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Marenghi, G. 1999. Aristotele: Problemi di Medicina: Testo Critico, Traduzione e Commento, 2nd ed. (Milan).Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2011. Aristotle: Problems: vol. 1 (Books 1–19), vol. 2 (Books 20–38, with D. Mirhady, [Arist.] Rhet. to Alex.) (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2015. “Problemata 26 and Theophrastus’ De ventis: A Preliminary Comparison,” in Mayhew, R., ed., The Aristotelian Problemata physica: Philosophical and Scientific Investigations (Leiden), 294–310.Google Scholar
Schneider, I. G. 1818. Theophrasti Eresii quae supersunt opera et excerpta librorum, vol. 1 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Sider, D. and Brunschön, C. W.. 2007. Theophrastus of Eresus: On Weather Signs (Leiden).Google Scholar
Sollenberger, M. G. 2003. “Theophrastus of Eresus, On Fatigue,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Sharples, R. W., and Sollenberger, M. G.. eds., Theophrastus of Eresus, On Sweat, On Dizziness and On Fatigue (Leiden), 251–324.Google Scholar
Tassios, T. P. 2018. “Mechanical Properties of Solids in Aristotle’s Meteorologica,” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D., ed., Aristotle: Contemporary Perspectives on His Thought (Berlin) 151–64.Google Scholar
Webster, C. 2014. “Technology and/as Theory: Material Thinking in Ancient Science and Medicine.” Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
References
Asper, M. 2017. ‘Machines on Paper: From Words to Acts in Ancient Mechanics’, in Formisano, M. and van der Eijk, P. J., eds., Knowledge, Text and Practice in Ancient Technical Writing (Cambridge), 27–52.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, S. 2020. ‘Ancient Greek Mechanics and the Mechanical Hypothesis’, in Taub, L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Science (Cambridge), 229–47.Google Scholar
Brain, P. 1986. Galen on Bloodletting: A Study of the Origins, Development and Validity of His Opinions, with a Translation of the Three Works (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Craik, E. 2017. ‘Teleology in Hippocratic Texts: Clues to the Future?’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge), 203–16.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. 2008. ‘Technology’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 15–34.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. 2018. ‘Greek Mechanics’, in Jones, A. and Taub, L., eds., The Cambridge History of Science: Volume i: Ancient Science (Cambridge), 449–67.Google Scholar
Cuypers, M. 2010. ‘Historiography, Rhetoric, and Science: Rethinking a Few Assumptions on Hellenistic Prose’ in Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M., eds., A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Chichester), 317–36.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 2000. Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder (Boston).Google Scholar
Erginel, M. M. 2019. ‘Plato on Pleasures Mixed with Pains: An Asymetrical Account’, OSAP, 56: 73–122.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. 2017. ‘Demosthenes and the Use of Disgust’, in Lateiner, D. and Spatharas, D., eds., The Ancient Emotion of Disgust (Oxford), 103–24.Google Scholar
Flemming, R. 2005. ‘Empires of Knowledge: Medicine and Health in the Hellenistic World’, in Erskine, A., ed., A Companion to the Hellenistic World (Oxford), 449–63.Google Scholar
Flemming, R. 2009. ‘Demiurge and Emperor in Galen’s World of Knowledge’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J., eds., Galen and the World of Knowledge (Cambridge), 59–84.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1988. ‘The Empiricist Attitude Towards Reason and Theory’ in Hankinson, R. J., ed., Method, Medicine and Metaphysics: Studies in the Philosophy of Ancient Science. Apeiron, 21: 70–97.Google Scholar
Furley, D. 1989. Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2021. ‘Teleological Perspectives in Aristotle’s Biology’, in Connell, S. M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, M. 2009. ‘Shock and Awe: The Performance Dimension of Galen’s Anatomy Demonstrations’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J., eds., Galen and the World of Knowledge (Cambridge), 85–114.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. 2011. Miracle and Natural Law in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Thought (Eugene, OR).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1995. ‘The Growth of Medical Empiricism’, in Bates, D., ed., Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions (Cambridge), 60–83.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1997. ‘Hellenistic Biological Sciences’, in Furley, D., ed., From Aristotle to Augustine: Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. 2 (London), 320–55.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1998a. Galen: On Antecedent Causes, Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2010. The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2014. ‘Proto-Sympathy in the Hippocratic Corpus’, in Jouanna, J. and Zink, M., eds., Hippocrate et les hippocratismes: médécine, religion, société (Paris), 123–38.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2018. ‘Body’, in Pormann, P. E., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates (Cambridge), 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2020. ‘From Craft to Nature: The Emergence of Natural Teleology’, in Taub, L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Science (Cambridge), 102–20.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2017. ‘Aristotelian Mechanistic Explanation’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge), 125–50.Google Scholar
Kazantzidis, G. 2017. ‘Empathy and the Limits of Disgust in the Hippocratic Corpus’, in Lateiner, D. and Spatharas, D., eds., The Ancient Emotion of Disgust (Oxford), 45–68.Google Scholar
Kazantzidis, G. 2018. ‘Medicine and the Paradox in the Hippocratic Corpus and beyond’, in Gerolemou, M., ed., Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond (Berlin), 31–61.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 2007. ‘Making a Text of the Universe: Perspectives on Discursive Order in the De Rerum Natura of Lucretius’, in Gale, M., ed., Oxford Readings in Lucretius (Oxford), 376–96.Google Scholar
Krafft, F. 1967. ‘Die Anfänge einer theoretischen Mechanik und die Wandlung ihrer Stellung zur Wissenschaft von Natur’, in Baron, W., ed., Beiträge zur Methodik der Wissenschaftsgeschichte (Wiesbaden), 12–33.Google Scholar
Krafft, F. 1973. ‘Kunst und Natur: Die Heronische Frage und die Technik in der klassischen Antike’, Antike und Abendland, 19: 1–19.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1985. ‘Theophrastus on the Limits of Teleology’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M. and Long, A. A., eds., Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work (New Brunswick), 146–63.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2018. ‘Aristotle, Dissection, and Generation: Experience, Expertise, and the Practices of Knowing’, in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D., eds., Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge), 249–72.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2021. ‘Empiricism and Hearsay in Aristotle’s Zoological Collection of Facts’, in Connell, S. M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge), 64–82.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1975. ‘Alcmaeon and the Early History of Dissection’, Sudhoffs Archiv, 59: 113–47.Google Scholar
Longrigg, J. 1993. Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians (London).Google Scholar
Lonie, I. M. 1973. ‘The Paradoxical Text ‘On the Heart”’, Medical History, 17: 1–15 and 136–53.Google Scholar
Malland, L. R. 2022, ‘Her Body, His Evidence: Female Subjugation in the Early Modern Anatomy Theaters’, in Malland, L. R., ed., The Spaces of Renaissance Anatomy Theater (Wilmington, DE), 89–108.Google Scholar
Mayor, A. 2018. Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Oleson, J. P. 1984. Greek and Roman Mechanical Water-Lifting Devices: The History of a Technology (Toronto).Google Scholar
Park, K. 2006, Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human Dissection (New York).Google Scholar
Polito, R. 2006. ‘Matter, Medicine, and the Mind: Asclepiades vs. Epicurus’, OSAP, 30: 285–335.Google Scholar
Rihl, T. E. 2018. ‘Mechanics and Pneumatics in the Classical World’, in Keyser, P. T. and Scarborough, J., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World (Oxford), 337–59Google Scholar
Rocca, J. 2003. Galen on the Brain: Anatomical Knowledge and Physiological Speculation in the Second Century ad (Leiden).Google Scholar
Roby, C. 2016. Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Russo, L. 2004. The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 bc and Why It Had to Be Reborn (transl. S. Levy) (Berlin).Google Scholar
Scharle, M. 2015. ‘“And These Things Follow”: Teleology, Necessity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Meteorologica’, in Ebrey, D., ed., Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science (Cambridge), 79–99.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2007. ‘Art and Nature in Ancient Mechanics’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Newman, W. R., eds., The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity (Cambridge, MA), 67–108.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2018. The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad (Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2017. ‘Socrates, Darwin, and Teleology’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge), 25–42.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 2001. Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Thomas, J. J. 2021. Art, Science, and the Natural World in the Ancient Mediterranean, 300 bc to ad 100 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Thumiger, C. 2017. A History of the Mind and Mental Health in Classical Greek Medical Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2013. ‘Miracle and Natural Cause in Galen’, in Alkier, S. and Weissenrieder, A., eds., Miracles Revisited: New Testament Miracles Stories and their Concepts of Reality (Berlin), 102–14.Google Scholar
Tybjerg, K. 2003. ‘Wonder-Making and Philosophical Wonder in Hero of Alexandriaʼ, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 34: 443–66.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. 2000. ‘Aristotle’s Psycho-physiological Account of the Body–Soul Relationship’, in Potter, P. and Wright, J. P., eds., Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind–Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment (Oxford), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. 2005. Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity: Doctors and Philosophers on Nature, Soul, Health and Disease (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 1993. ‘I nervi dell’ anima’, in Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D., eds., Galen und das Hellenistische Erbe: Verhandlungen des IV. Internationalen Galen-Symposiums (Stuttgart), 63–77.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 1998. ‘Between Knowledge and Practice: Hellenistic Medicine’, in Grmek, M. D., ed., Western Medical Thought from Antiquity to the Middle Ages (transl. A. Shugaar) (Cambridge, MA), 72–103.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 1999. ‘Historiographical Strategies in Galen’s Physiology’, in van der Eijk, P. J., ed., Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity (Leiden), 383–95.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1983. ‘Some Remarks on the Forms and Limitations of Technological Thought among the Greeks’, in Vernant, J.-P., Myth and Thought among the Greeks (transl. J. Lloyd) (London), 279–301.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1975. ‘Experiment and Experience in Hellenistic Medicine’, BICS, 22: 178–99.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1989. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Edition, Translation and Essays (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1992. ‘The Discovery of the Body: Human Dissection and Its Cultural Contexts in Ancient Greece’, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 65: 223–41.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1996. ‘Body and Machine: Interactions Between Medicine, Mechanics, and Philosophy in Early Alexandria’, in Walsh, J. and Reese, T. F., eds., Alexandria and Alexandrianism (Malibu, CA), 85–106.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1997. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Anatomy’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart), 183–208.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1998. ‘Andréas de Caryste et Philon de Byzance: médecine et mécanique à Alexandrie’, in Argoud, G. and Guillaumin, J.-Y., eds., Sciences exactes et sciences appliquées à Alexandrie (Saint-Étienne), 147–72.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 2007. ‘Physis and Technē in Greek Medicine’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Newman, W. R., eds., The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity (Cambridge, MA), 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. 2000. ‘Pathos and Katharsis in “Aristotelian” Rhetoric: Some Implications’, in Gross, A. G. and Walzer, A. E., eds., Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Carbondale, IL), 74–92.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2011. Narrative and Identity in the Ancient Greek Novel: Returning Romance (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Wilson, A. I. 2008. ‘Machines in Greek and Roman Technology’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 337–66.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2015. ‘In Defense of the Craft Analogy: Artifacts and Natural Teleology’, in Leunissen, M., ed., Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge), 107–20.Google Scholar
References
Carra de Vaux, B. 1902. Le livre des appareils pneumatiques et des machines hydrauliques par Philon de Byzance (Paris).Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. 1984. Galen on the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (Galeni de placitis Hippocratis et Platonis), translated by Phillip de Lacy. Vol. 2, books vi–ix (Berlin).Google Scholar
Diels, H. A. 1893. “Über das physikalische System des Straton,” Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1: 101–127.Google Scholar
Drachmann, A. G. 1948. Ktesibios, Philon and Heron: A Study in Ancient Pneumatics (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Giocondo, G., 1513. Vitruvius: De architectura libri x iterum et Frontinus à Iocundi revisi repurgatique quantum ex collatione licuit (Florence).Google Scholar
Hine, H. M. 1996. “Aetna,” in Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A., eds., The Oxford Classical Dictionary (Oxford), 31.Google Scholar
Hodge, T. A. 1983. “Siphons in Roman Aqueducts,” Papers of the British School at Rome, 51: 174–221.Google Scholar
Lonie, I. M. 1973a. “The Paradoxical Text ‘On the Heart.’ Part 1,” Medical History, 17 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonie, I. M. 1973b. “The Paradoxical Text ‘On the Heart.’ Part 2,” Medical History, 17 (2): 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleson, J. P. 1984. Greek and Roman Mechanical Water-Lifting Devices: The History of a Technology (Toronto).Google Scholar
Rowland, I. D., Howe, T. N., and Dewar, M. J., eds. 1999. Vitruvius: Ten Books on Architecture, 10 vols. (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Russo, L. 2004. The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 bc and Why It Had to Be Reborn (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiefsky, M. 2015. “Technē and Method in Ancient Artillery Construction: The Belopoeica of Philo of Byzantium,” in Brooke, H. and Fischer, K. D., eds., The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin), 613–651.Google Scholar
Scott, S. P., ed. 1932. The Civil Law, including the Twelve Tables: The Institutes of Gaius, the Rules of Ulpian, the Opinions of Paulus, the Enactments of Justinian, and the Constitutions of Leo. Translated from the Original Latin, Edited, and Compared with All Accessible Systems of Jurisprudence Ancient and Modern, 17 vols. (Cincinnati).Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. 2015. “Seneca and the Ancient World,” in Bartsch, S. and Schiesaro, A., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Seneca (Cambridge), 255–265.Google Scholar
Valleriani, M. 2016. “Hydrostatics and Pneumatics in Antiquity,” in Irby, G. L., ed., A Companion to Science, Technology and Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome (Hoboken, NJ), 145–160.Google Scholar
Valleriani, M. 2017. “The Epistemology of Practical Knowledge,” in Valleriani, M., ed., Structures of Practical Knowledge (Dordrecht), 1–19.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1973. “The Alexandrians,” in Harris, C. R. S., ed., The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine: From Alcmaeon to Galen (Oxford), 177–233.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1990. “Cardiovascular Puzzles in Erasistratus and Herophilus,” in Bernabeo, R., ed., Atti del xxxi Congresso Internazionale di Storia della Medicina (Bologna, 30 agosto – 4 settembre 1988) (Bologna), 385–391.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1997. “Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Akten des Symposions über Aristoteles’ Biologie vom 24.–28. Juli 1995 in der Werner-Reimers-Stiftung in Bad Homburg (Wiesbaden), 183–208.Google Scholar
Webster, C. 2014. “Technology and/as Theory: Material Thinking in Ancient Science and Medicine.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Columbia.Google Scholar
References
Berryman, S. 2007. ‘Teleology without Tears: Aristotle and the Role of Mechanistic Conceptions of Organisms’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37.3: 351–69.Google Scholar
Boylan, M. 1982. ‘The Digestive and “Circulatory” Systems in Aristotle’s Biology’, Journal of the History of Biology, 15.1: 89–118.Google ScholarPubMed
Boylan, M. 2015. The Origins of Ancient Greek Science: Blood. A Philosophical Study (New York).Google Scholar
Brock, A. J. ed. 1916. Galen: On the Natural Faculties (Cambridge, MA) (reprint, 2006).Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V., A. Pietrobelli, 2005. ‘Galien ressuscité : édition princeps du texte grec du De propriis placitis’, Revue des Études Grecques, 118: 168–213.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2015. ‘Faculties in Ancient Philosophy’, in Perler, D., ed., The Faculties: A History (Oxford), 19–58.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. 1988. ‘The Third Part of the Soul’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M., eds., Le opere psicologiche di Galeno: atti del terzo Colloquio galenico internazionale, Pavia, 10–12 settembre 1986 (Naples), 43–63.Google Scholar
Debru, A. 2008. ‘Physiology’, in Hankinson, R. J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Galen (Cambridge), 263–82.Google Scholar
Duckworth, W. H. L., Lyons, M. C. and Towers, B.. 1962. Galen on Anatomical Procedures: The Later Books (Cambridge) (reprint, 2010).Google Scholar
Dyce, K., Sack, W. O. and Wensing, C. J. G.. 2010. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy (4th ed.). (St Louis).Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. and Wilkie, J. S.. 1984. Galen on Respiration and the Arteries (Princeton).Google Scholar
Garofalo, I., ed. 1986–2000. Galeni anatomicarum administrationum libri qui supersunt novem. 2 vols. (Napoli).Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford).Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2015. ‘Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology’, in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D., eds., The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin), 139–74.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2014. ‘Galen and the Ontology of Powers’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22.5: 951–73.Google Scholar
Harari, O. 2016. ‘Alexander against Galen on Motion: A Mere Logical Debate?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 50: 201–36.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. S. 1973. The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine: From Alcmaeon to Galen (Oxford).Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. 1907–9. Galeni De usu partium libri xvii. 2 vols. (Leipzig) (reprint, Amsterdam, 1968).Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2017. ‘Aristotelian Mechanistic Explanation’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Kühn, C. G., ed. 1821–33. Claudii Galeni opera omnia. 22 vos. (Leipzig) (reprint, Cambridge, 2011).Google Scholar
Lewis, O. 2017. Praxagoras of Cos on Arteries, Pulse and Pneuma: Fragments and Interpretation (Leiden).Google Scholar
Marechal, P. 2020. ‘Reflection 1: Teleology and Function in Galenic Anatomy’, in McDonough, J. K., ed., Teleology: A History (Oxford), 64–70.Google Scholar
Meyer-Steineg, T. 1913. ‘Studien zur Physiologie des Galenos’, Archiv Für Geschichte Der Medizin, 6.6: 417–48.Google Scholar
Rocca, J. 2003. Galen on the Brain: Anatomical Knowledge and Physiological Speculation in the Second Century ad (Leiden).Google Scholar
Rocca, J. 2020. ‘Galen on Pneuma: Between Metaphysical Speculation and Anatomical Theory’, in Coughlin, S., Leith, D. and Lewis, O., eds., The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle (Berlin), 283–312.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2007. ‘Galen’s Teleology and Functional Explanation’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 33: 369–400.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2012. ‘Galen and the Tripartite Soul’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C., eds., Plato and the Divided Self (Cambridge), 331–49.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. E. 1968. Galen’s System of Physiology and Medicine: An Analysis of His Doctrines and Observations on Bloodflow, Respiration, Humors and Internal Diseases (Basel).Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. and van der Eijk, P. J., eds. 2019. Galen: Works on Human Nature, vol. 1: Mixtures (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J, 2014. ‘Galen on the Nature of Human Beings’, in Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J., eds., Philosophical Themes in Galen (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 114) (London), 89–134.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J 2015. ‘Galen on the Assessment of Bodily Mixtures’, in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D., eds., The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin), 675–98.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1997. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse: Akten des Symposions über Aristoteles’ Biologie vom 24.–28. Juli 1995 in der Werner-Reimers-Stiftung in Bad Homburg (Wiesbaden), 183–208.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 2002. ‘Body, Soul, and Nerves: Epicurus, Herophilus, Erasistratus, the Stoics, and Galen’, in Wright, J. P and Potter, P., eds., Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind–Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment (Oxford).Google Scholar
Trompeter, J. 2018. ‘The Actions of Spirit and Appetite: Voluntary Motion in Galen’, Phronesis, 63.2: 176–207.Google Scholar
Visible Body: Human Anatomy Atlas. 2017. Version 2017.2.08 [Computer Software], Argosy Publishing.Google Scholar
References
Blåsjö, V. and Hogendijk, J. P, 2018. “On Translating Mathematics,” Isis, 109.4: 774–781.Google Scholar
Bravo, B. 2007. “Antiquarianism and History,” in Marincola, J., ed., A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, 2 vols. (Malden, MA), 2.515–527.Google Scholar
Bresadola, M. 2018. “The Problems of Anatomica Practica and How to Solve Them: Pathological Dissection around 1700,” in De Renzi, S., Bresadola, M., and Conforti, M., eds., Pathology in Practice: Diseases and Dissections in Early Modern Europe (London), 56–75.Google Scholar
Burke, P. 2007. “Lost (and Found) in Translation: A Cultural History of Translators and Translating in Early Modern Europe,” European Review, 15.1: 83–94.Google Scholar
Capitani, U. 1974. “Il recupero di un passo di Celso in un codice del De Medicina conservato a Toledo,” Maia, 26: 161–212.Google Scholar
Conde Parrado, P. P. 2003. Hipócrates Latino: El De Medicina de Cornelio Celso en el Renacimiento (Valladolid).Google Scholar
Conde Parrado, P. P. 2008. “‘Por el orden de Celso’: aspectos de la influencia del De medicina en la cirugía europea del Renacimiento,” Dynamis: Acta Hispanica ad Medicinae Scientiarumque Historiam Illustrandam 28: 217–241.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. 2010. The Anatomist Anatomis’d: An Experimental Discipline in Enlightenment Europe (Farnham).Google Scholar
Daston, L. and Most, G.. 2015. “History of Science and History of Philologies,” Isis, 106.2: 378–390.Google Scholar
Fischer, K.-D. 1994. “Der Artz Johann Friedrich Clossius (1735–1787): Leben und Werk eines Celsusliebhabers im Zeitalter der Aufklärung,” in Mudry, P. and Sabbah, G., eds., La Médecine de Celse: aspects historiques, scientifiques et littéraires (Sainte-Étienne), 359–371.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception, transl. A. M. Sheridan (London).Google Scholar
Gautherie, A. 2017. Rhétorique et thérapeutique dans le De Medicina de Celse (Turnhout).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F. 1734. Medicinae Rationalis Systematicae Tomi Quarti: quo specialis morborum pathologia et huic superstructa solida therapia cum medendi methodo cautelis clinicis et morborum enarrationibus adiuncta epicrisi exhibentur: pars secunda doctrinam haemorrhagiarum et dolorum perspicua et demonstrativa methodo tradens (Halle).Google Scholar
Lo Presti, R. 2014. “La place d’Hippocrate dans les grandes querelles médicales du xviie siècle: le cas du débat sur la circulation sanguine,” in Jouanna, J. and Zink, M., eds., Hippocrate et les hippocratismes: médecine, religion, société. xive Colloque International Hippocratique (Paris), 461–482.Google Scholar
Maire, B. 1994. “Proposition d’un nouveau ‘stemma codicum’ de la tradition manuscrite du ‘De medicina’ d’Aulus Cornelius Celsus,” in Vázquez Buján, M. E., ed., Tradición e innovación de la medicina latina de la Antigüedad y de la Alta Edad Media (Santiago de Compostela), 87–99.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 1993. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Najman, H. 2017. “Ethical Reading: The Transformation of the Text and the Self,” Journal of Theological Studies, 68.2: 507–529.Google Scholar
Nardo, D. 1981. “Scienza e filologia nel primo Settecento padovano. Gli studi classici di G.B. Morgagni, G. Poleni, G. Pontedera, L. Targa,” Quaderni per Storia dell‘Università di Padova, 14: 1–40.Google Scholar
Nicholson, M. 1992. “Giovanni Battista Morgagni and Eighteenth-Century Physical Examination,” in Lawrence, C., ed., Medical Theory, Surgical Practices: Studies in the History of Surgery (London), 101–134.Google Scholar
Pearle, M., Antonelli, J., and Lotan, Y.. 2016. “Urinary Lithiasis: Etiology, Epidemiology, and Pathogenesis,” in Wein, A. J., Kavoussi, L. R., Partin, A. W., and Peters, C., eds., Campbell-Walsh Urology, 11th ed. (Philadelphia), 1170–1199.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J. F. 2013. ‘The De Medicina, Cornelius Celsus and Surgery in the First Century ce’, unpublished PhD thesis (University of Queensland).Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. 2019. Mosaics of Knowledge: Representing Information in the Roman World (Oxford).Google Scholar
Rojouan, J. 1997. “Huit lettres ‘In Celsum’: Morgagni – médecin et philologue,” 2 vols. PhD thesis (University of Nantes).Google Scholar
Scheller, E. and Frieboes, W.. 1906. Aulus Cornelius Celsus: Über die Arzneiwissenschaft in acht Bücher 2nd ed. (Braunschweig).Google Scholar
Stolberg, M. 2016. “Epilogue: Approaches to the History of Patients: From the Ancient World to Early Modern Europe,” in Petridou, G. and Thumiger, C., eds., Homo Patiens: Approaches to the Patient in the Ancient World (Leiden) 497–518.Google Scholar
Trovato, P. 2014. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lachmann’s Method: A Non-Standard Handbook of Genealogical Textual Criticism in the Age of Post-Structuralism, Cladistics, and Copy-Text, transl. F. Poole (Padua).Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1973. Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Zampieri, F. 2016. Il metodo anatomo-clinico fra meccanicismo ed empirismo: Marcello Malpighi, Antonio Maria Valsalva et Giovanni Battista Morgagni (Rome).Google Scholar
References
Distelzweig, P. 2015. ‘The Use of Usus and the Function of Functio: Teleology and Its Limits in Descartes’ Physiology’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53: 377–99.Google Scholar
Garber, D. 2013. ‘Remarks on the Pre-history of the Mechanical Philosophy’, in Garber, D. and Roux, S., eds., The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy (Dordrecht), 3–26.Google Scholar
Kakoudaki, D. 2014. Anatomy of a Robot: Literature, Cinema, and the Cultural Work of Artificial People (New Brunswick).Google Scholar
Landes, B. J. 2011. ‘Vaucanson’s Automata as Devices of Enlightenment’, Sjuttonhundratal, 8: 50–9.Google Scholar
Riskin, J. 2003. ‘The Defecating Duck, or, The Ambiguous Origins of Artificial Life’, Critical Inquiry, 29: 599–633.Google Scholar
Riskin, J. 2016. The Restless Clock: A History of Centuries-Long Argument over What Makes Living Things Tick (Chicago).Google Scholar
Roux, S. 2018. ‘From the Mechanical Philosophy to Early Modern Mechanisms’, in Glennan, S. and Illari, P., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy (New York), 26–45.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. 2003. ‘The Health of the Body-Machine? Or, Seventeenth Century Mechanism and the Concept of Health’, Perspectives on Science, 11: 421–42.Google Scholar
Vaccari, A. 2008. ‘Legitimating the Machine: The Epistemological Foundation of Technological Metaphors in the Natural Philosophy of René Descartes’, Oeuvres Complètes d’Hippocrate, Emile Littré (Paris). in Zittel, C., Engel, G., Nanni, R., and Karafyllis, N. C., eds., Philosophies of Technology: Francis Bacon and His Contemporaries (Leiden), 287–336.Google Scholar