Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:14:17.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Council of Nicaea and the Celebration of the Christian Pasch

from Part III - Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Young Richard Kim
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access

Summary

In 525 Dionysius Exiguus compiled his 95-year continuation of the Alexandrian Paschal table, which eventually scheduled the celebration of Pasch for the entire western Church. He also stated that the Council of Nicaea had authorized the 19-year Alexandrian Paschal cycle and that this had been maintained by subsequent Alexandrian bishops. These statements were challenged by Jan in 1718, and since then the question of Nicaean authority has been disputed. However, while the Synoptic Gospels agree that the Crucifixion took place on the day after the Jewish Passover, John’s Gospel places it on the day of the Passover and hence on the fourteenth day of the spring moon. Thus the Evangelistic accounts of Jesus’s Crucifixion conflict chronologically. Consequently, the Asian churches chose to emphasize the Crucifixion by celebrating Pasch on the fourteenth day of the moon, while other churches emphasized the Resurrection by celebrating it on Sunday. At Nicaea Constantine sought to resolve this conflict, and contemporaneous accounts agree that the Council decreed that Pasch be celebrated only on Sunday, and forbade celebration on the fourteenth day. This chapter concludes that the origin of the Alexandrian Paschal table lies rather with bishop Theophilus in the last decades of the fourth century.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select References

Barnes, Timothy D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil, and Hall, Stuart G., trans. 1999. Eusebius: Life of Constantine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1943. Bedae opera de temporibus. Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Krusch, Bruno. 1880. Studien zur christlich-mittelalterlichen Chronologie: Der 84jährige Ostercyclus und seine Quellen. Leipzig: Veit.Google Scholar
Krusch, Bruno. 1938. Studien zur christlich-mittelalterlichen Chronologie: Die Entstehung unserer heutigen Zeitrechnung. Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 8. Berlin: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Mc Carthy, Daniel. 1993. “Easter Principles and a Fifth-Century Lunar Cycle Used in the British Isles.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 24: 204–24.Google Scholar
Mc Carthy, Daniel. 2011. “On the Arrival of the Latercus in Ireland.” In The Easter Controversy of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, ed. Warntjes, Immo and Cróinín, Dáibhí Ó, 4875. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Mc Carthy, Daniel and Breen, Aidan, eds. 2003. The Ante-Nicene Christian Pasch De ratione paschali”: The Paschal Tract of Anatolius, Bishop of Laodicea. Dublin: Four Courts.Google Scholar
Mosshammer, Alden. 2008. The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosshammer, Alden, ed. 2017. The Prologues on Easter of Theophilus of Alexandria and [Cyril]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, Archibald, trans. 1892. Athanasius: Select Works and Letters. NPNF 2.4. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Eduard. 1905. Christliche und jüdische Ostertafeln. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologisch-historische Klasse, Neue Folge, vol. 8, no. 6. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Eduard, Schwartz and Mommsen, Theodor, eds. 1903–9. Eusebius Werke II.1–3. Die Kirchengeschichte. GCS 9.1–3. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
van der Hagen, Johannes. 1733. Observationes in Prosperi Aquitani Chronicon [] Amsterdam: Johannem Boom.Google Scholar
Walch, Christian. 1770. “Decreti Nicaeni de Paschate Explicatio.” Novum Commentarium Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Goettingensis, commentationes historicae et philologicae 1: 1065. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×