Book contents
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development
- Child Development
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Editorial preface
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments: External Reviewers
- Introduction Study of child development: an interdisciplinary enterprise
- Part I Theories of development
- Part II Methods in child development research
- Part III Prenatal development and the newborn
- Part IV Perceptual and cognitive development
- Part V Language and communication development
- Part VI Social and emotional development
- Part VII Motor and related development
- Perception and action
- Handedness
- Handwriting
- Locomotion
- Prehension
- Sucking and chewing
- Throwing
- Part VIII Postnatal brain development
- Part IX Developmental pathology
- Part X Crossing the borders
- Part XI Speculations about future directions
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Handedness
from Part VII - Motor and related development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development
- Child Development
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Editorial preface
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments: External Reviewers
- Introduction Study of child development: an interdisciplinary enterprise
- Part I Theories of development
- Part II Methods in child development research
- Part III Prenatal development and the newborn
- Part IV Perceptual and cognitive development
- Part V Language and communication development
- Part VI Social and emotional development
- Part VII Motor and related development
- Perception and action
- Handedness
- Handwriting
- Locomotion
- Prehension
- Sucking and chewing
- Throwing
- Part VIII Postnatal brain development
- Part IX Developmental pathology
- Part X Crossing the borders
- Part XI Speculations about future directions
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development , pp. 523 - 529Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Further reading
Cochet, H., & Vauclair, J. (2012). Hand preferences in human adults: Noncommunicative actions vs. communicative gestures. Cortex, 48, 1017–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagard, J., & Dahmen, R. (2004). Cultural influences on the development of lateral preferences: A comparison between French and Tunisian children. Laterality, 9, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, E.L., Campbell, J.M., & Michel, G.F. (2014). Early handedness in infancy predicts language ability in toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 50, 809–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provins, K.A. (1992). Early infant asymmetries and handedness: A critical evaluation of the evidence. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8, 325–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand and brain: The right shift theory. London, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bonvillian, J.D., Richards, H.C., & Dooley, T.T. (1997). Early sign language acquisition and the development of hand preference in young children. Brain & Language, 58, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochet, H., & Byrne, R.W. (2013). Evolutionary origins of human handedness: Evaluating contrasting hypotheses. Animal Cognition, 16, 531–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochet, H., & Vauclair, J. (2010). Pointing gestures produced by toddlers from 15 to 30 months: Different functions, hand shapes and laterality patterns. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 432–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochet, H., Jover, J., & Vauclair, J. (2011). Hand preference for pointing gestures and bimanual manipulation around the vocabulary spurt period. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corballis, M.C., Badzakova-Trajkov, G., & Haberling, I.S. (2012). Right hand, left brain: Genetic and evolutionary bases of cerebral asymmetries for language and manual action. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3, 1–17.Google Scholar
Crow, T.J. (2010). A theory of the origin of cerebral asymmetry: Epigenetic variation superimposed on a fixed right-shift. Laterality, 15, 289–303.Google Scholar
Dubois, J., Hertz-Pannier, L., Cachia, A., Mangin, J.F., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2009). Structural asymmetries in the infant language and sensori-motor networks. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 414–423.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Mehta, S., & Grabowski, T.J. (2007). The neural correlates of sign versus word production. NeuroImage, 36, 202–208.Google Scholar
Esseily, R., Jacquet, A.Y., & Fagard, J. (2011). Handedness for grasping objects and pointing and the development of language in 14-month-old infants. Laterality, 16, 565–585.Google Scholar
Fagard, J., & Marks, A. (2000). Unimanual and bimanual tasks and the assessment of handedness in toddlers. Developmental Science, 3, 137–147.Google Scholar
Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2005). Handedness, homicide and negative frequency-dependent selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 25–28.Google Scholar
Hepper, P.G., Wells, D.L., & Lynch, C. (2005). Prenatal thumb sucking is related to postnatal handedness. Neuropsychologia, 43, 313–315.Google Scholar
Knecht, S., Dräger, B., Deppe, M., Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., Flöel, A., Ringelstein, B.E., & Henningsen, H. (2000). Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain, 123, 2512–2518.Google Scholar
Llaurens, V., Raymond, M., & Faurie, C. (2009). Why are some people left-handed? An evolutionary perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society-B, 364, 881–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNeilage, P.F., Rogers, L.J., & Vallortigara, G. (2009). Origins of the left and right brain. Scientific American, 301, 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, L.F., McGrew, W.C., & Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1995). Is human handedness universal? Ethological analyses from three traditional cultures. Ethology, 101, 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, I.C. (1999). Handedness, cerebral lateralization and the evolution of language. In Corballis, M.C. & Lea, S.E.G. (Eds.), The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 194–217). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McManus, I.C., Sik, G., Cole, D.R., Mellon, A.F., Wong, J., & Kloss, J. (1988). The development of handedness in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 257–273.Google Scholar
Meguerditchian, A., Vauclair, J., & Hopkins, W.D. (2013). On the origins of human handedness and language: A comparative review of hand preferences for bimanual coordinated actions and gestural communication in nonhuman primates. Developmental Psychobiology, 55, 637–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, G.F., Babik, I., Sheu, C.F., & Campbell, J.M. (2014). Latent classes in the developmental trajectories of infant handedness. Developmental Psychology, 50, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, E.L., Campbell, J.M., & Michel, G.F. (2013). Unimanual to bimanual: Tracking the development of handedness from 6 to 24 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 181–188.Google Scholar
Propper, R.E., Christman, S.D., & Phaneuf, K.A. (2005). A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition, 33, 751–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somers, M., Sommer, I.E., Boks, M.P., & Kahn, R.S. (2009). Hand-preference and population schizotypy: A meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 108, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommer, I.E.C., & Kahn, R.S. (2009). Sex differences in handedness and language lateralization. In Sommer, I.E.C. & Kahn, R.S. (Eds.), Language lateralization and psychosis (pp. 101–118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, J., Gannon, P.J., Emmorey, K., Smith, J.F., & Braun, A.R. (2009). Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 20664–20669.Google Scholar