Book contents
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development
- Child Development
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Editorial preface
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments: External Reviewers
- Introduction Study of child development: an interdisciplinary enterprise
- Part I Theories of development
- Part II Methods in child development research
- Part III Prenatal development and the newborn
- Part IV Perceptual and cognitive development
- Part V Language and communication development
- Part VI Social and emotional development
- Part VII Motor and related development
- Perception and action
- Handedness
- Handwriting
- Locomotion
- Prehension
- Sucking and chewing
- Throwing
- Part VIII Postnatal brain development
- Part IX Developmental pathology
- Part X Crossing the borders
- Part XI Speculations about future directions
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Handwriting
from Part VII - Motor and related development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development
- Child Development
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Editorial preface
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments: External Reviewers
- Introduction Study of child development: an interdisciplinary enterprise
- Part I Theories of development
- Part II Methods in child development research
- Part III Prenatal development and the newborn
- Part IV Perceptual and cognitive development
- Part V Language and communication development
- Part VI Social and emotional development
- Part VII Motor and related development
- Perception and action
- Handedness
- Handwriting
- Locomotion
- Prehension
- Sucking and chewing
- Throwing
- Part VIII Postnatal brain development
- Part IX Developmental pathology
- Part X Crossing the borders
- Part XI Speculations about future directions
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development , pp. 530 - 536Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Further reading
Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C., & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and Pen: A new device for studying reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 287–299.Google Scholar
Berninger, V., & Swanson, L. (1994). Modifying Hayes & Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In Butterfield, E. (Ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2009). Want to improve children’s writing? Don’t neglect their handwriting. American Educator, 33, 20–40.Google Scholar
References
Accardo, A.P., Genna, M., & Borean, M. (2013). Development, maturation and learning influence of handwriting kinematics. Human Movement Science, 32, 999–1009.Google Scholar
Alamargot, D., Plane, S., Lambert, E., & Chesnet, D. (2009). Using eye and pen movements to trace the development of writing expertise: Case studies of a 7th, 9th and 12th grader, a graduate student, and professional writer. Reading and Writing, 23, 853–888.Google Scholar
Barnett, A., Henderson, S., Scheib, B., & Schulz, J. (2007). The detailed assessment of speed of handwriting. London, UK: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Berninger, V., & Amtmann, D. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In Swanson, H., Harris, K., & Graham, S. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323–344). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bosga-Stork, I.M., Bosga, J., & Meulenbroek, R.G.J. (2014). Developing movement efficiency between 7 and 9 years of age. Motor Control, 18, 1–17.Google Scholar
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production. Journal of Psychology, 37, 219–222.Google Scholar
Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479–492.Google Scholar
Di Brina, C., Niels, R., Overvelde, A., Levi, G., & Hulstijn, W. (2008). Dynamic time warping: A new method in the study of poor handwriting. Human Movement Science, 27, 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Schafer, W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1–9. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42–52.Google Scholar
Kandel, S., Peereman, R., Grosjacques, G., & Fayol, M. (2011). For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: Testing the syllable–bigram controversy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1310–1322.Google Scholar
Longstaff, M.G., & Heath, R.A. (2003). The influence of motor system degradation on the control of handwriting movements: A dynamical systems analysis. Human Movement Science, 22, 91–110.Google Scholar
Plamondon, R., O’Reilly, C., Remi, C., & Duval, T. (2013). The lognormal handwriter: Learning, performing and declining. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–14.Google Scholar
Prunty, M.M., Barnett, A.L., Wilmut, K. & Plumb, M.S. (2013). Handwriting speed in children with developmental coordination disorder: Are they really slower? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 2927–2936.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, S., Weiss, P.L., & Parush, S. (2003). Product and process evaluation of handwriting difficulties: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 41–81.Google Scholar
Roux, S., McKeeff, T.J., Grosjacques, G., Afonso, O., & Kandel, S. (2013). The interaction between central and peripheral processes in handwriting production. Cognition, 127, 235–241.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.A., & Wrisberg, C.A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Schneck, C., & Amundson, S. (2010). Prewriting and handwriting skills. In Case-Smith, J. & Clifford O’Brien, J. (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (pp. 555–582). Maryland Heights, MI: Mosby Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tolchinsky, L. (2006). The emergence of writing. In MacArthur, C.A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 83–95). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Van Galen, G. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R.K., Puranik, C.S., Foorman, B., Foster, E., Wilson, L.G., Tschinkel, E., & Kantor, P.T. (2011). Modelling the development of written language. Reading and Writing, 24, 203–220.Google Scholar
Wallen, M., Duff, S., Goyen, T., & Froude, E. (2013). Respecting the evidence: Responsible assessment and effective intervention for children with handwriting difficulties. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60, 366–369.Google Scholar
Zwicker, J.G., & Montgomery, I. (2012). Application to motor learning principles to handwriting instruction and intervention. Handwriting Today, 11, 9–17.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by