Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T22:55:37.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Reassessing Sprachbunds: A View from the Balkans

from Part I - Issues in Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2006a. Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2006b. Semantics and pragmatics of grammatical relations in the Vaupés linguistic area. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 237266.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), 2006. Grammars in Contact: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Joseph H., 1916. Allen and Greenough’s New Latin Grammar. New York: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Altimari, Francesco, 2011. Traces d’infinitifs anciens appartenant à l’albanais dans la langue arbërisht d’Italie. In Antoniadis-Bibicou, Hélène, Aymard, Maurice and Guillou, André (eds), L’homme et son environnement dans le Sud-Est européen: Actes du Xe Congrès de l’Association internationale du Sud-Est européen, pp. 445455. Paris: Association Pierre Belon.Google Scholar
Andriotis, Nikolaos and Kourmoulis, Georgios, 1968. Questions de la linguistique balkanique et l’apport de la langue grecque. In Gălăbov, I. et al. (eds), Actes du Premier Congrès International des Études Balkaniques et Sud-est Européennes, vol. 6, pp. 2130. Sofia: BAN.Google Scholar
Asenova, Petja, 2002. Balkansko ezikoznanie [Balkan Linguistics], second edition. Veliko Tărnovo: Faber.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, 1998a. Revisiting the Balkan and Meso-American linguistic areas. Language Sciences 20 (3): 259270.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, 1998b. Conclusions. In van der Auwera, Johan (ed.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, pp. 813836. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie and Cukor-Avila, Patricia, 1989. Variation in subject–verb concord in early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1 (3): 285300.Google Scholar
Ball, Christopher G., 2007. Out of the Park: Trajectories of Wauja (Xingu Arawak) Language and Culture. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Beck, David, 2000. Grammatical convergence and the genesis of diversity in the Northwest coast Sprachbund. Anthropological Linguistics 42: 147213Google Scholar
Belić, Aleksandar, 1936. La linguistique balkanique aux congrès internationaux des linguistes. Revue Internationale des Etudes Balkaniques 2 (3/4): 167171.Google Scholar
Belyavski-Frank, Masha, 2003. The Balkan Conditional in South Slavic. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin, 2009. Lexical othering in Judezmo: How Ottoman Sephardim refer to non-Jews. In Bunis, David M. (ed.), Languages and Literatures of Sephardic and Oriental Jews, pp. 6585. Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute & Misgav Yerushalayim.Google Scholar
Bird, Norman, 1982. The Distribution of Indo-European Root Morphemes (A Checklist for Philologists). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Henrik, 1968. Slavjanskie jazyki na Balkanax i ponjatie tak nazyvaemyx jazykovyx sojuzov. Glossa 2 (1): 7092.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter, 2006. Linguistic areas, language contact and typology: Some implications from the case of Ethiopia as a linguistic area. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 7598. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert, 1996. The new infinitive in Romani. Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society, Fifth Series 6: 151.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, Kaufman, Terrence and Smith-Stark, Thomas C., 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62: 530570.Google Scholar
Chang, Will, Cathcart, Chundra, Hall, David and Garrett, Andrew, 2015. Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91: 194244.Google Scholar
Demiraj, Shaban, 2004. Gjuhësi ballkanike, second edition. Tiranë: Akademia e Shkencave e Republikës së Shqipërise (Instituti i Gjuhësisë dhe i Letërisë).Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., 1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobreva, Iskra. 2016. Préstam panbalcanicos en judeoespañol / Panbalkanski zaemki v sefardski ezik. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sofia.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark, 2012. Studying contact without detailed studies of the languages involved: A non-philological approach to language contact. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA, 10–12 February 2012.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B., 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32: 316.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick, 2005. Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181206.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., 2008. Transmission biases in linguistic epidemiology. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 2: 297306.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience, 2006. The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 267289.Google Scholar
Feuillet, Jack, 2012. Linguistique comparée des langues balkaniques. Paris: Institut d’études slaves.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 1995. Persistence and change in Ottoman patterns of codeswitching in the Republic of Macedonia: Nostalgia, duress and language shift in contemporary Southeastern Europe. In Gorter, Durk et al. (eds), Summer School: Code-switching and Language Contact, pp. 5867. Ljouwert/Leeuwarden: Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 1996. The Turkish lexical element in the languages of the Republic of Macedonia from the Ottoman period to independence. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 32 (1): 133150Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2000. After 170 years of Balkan linguistics: Whither the millennium? Mediterranean Language Review 12: 115.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2003. Language in Macedonia as an identity construction site. In Joseph, Brian, DeStefano, Johanna, Jacobs, Neil and Lehiste, Ilse (eds), When Languages Collide: Perspectives on Language Conflict, Language Competition, and Language Coexistence, pp. 257295. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2005. From orientalism to democracy and back again. In Detrez, Raymond and Plas, Pieter (eds), Developing Cultural Identity in the Balkans: Convergence vs. Divergence, pp. 2543. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2006a. Balkanizing the Balkan sprachbund: A closer look at grammatical permeability and feature distribution. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 201219.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2006b. The Balkans as a linguistic area. In Brown, Keith (Editor-in-Chief), Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 657672. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2007. Udvojuvanjeto na objektot vo balkanskite jazici vo minatoto i denes [Macedonian: Object reduplication in Balkan languages in the past and today]. In Topolińska, Zuzana et al. (eds), Klasika – Balkanistika – Paleoslavistika: Festschrift in Honor of the 85th Birthday and 60th Anniversary of Scholarly Activity of Acad. Petar Ilievski, pp. 235249. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2008. Balkan Slavic dialectology and Balkan linguistics: Periphery as center. In Bethin, Christina (ed.), American Contributions to the Fourteenth International Congress of Slavists, pp. 131148. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2011a. The Balkan languages and Balkan linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 275291.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2011b. Le multilinguisme en République de Macédoine et l’union balkanique aujourd’hui. In Antoniadis-Bibicou, Hélène, Aymard, Maurice and Guillou, André (eds), L’homme et son environnement dans le Sud-Est européen: Actes du Xe Congrès de l’Association internationale du Sud-Est européen, pp. 479481. Paris: Association Pierre Belon.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2012. Conjunction calquing: A heartland Balkanism. In Kahl, Thede, Metzelin, Michael and Schaller, Helmut (eds), Balkanismen heute / Balkanisms Today / Balkanizmy segodnja, pp. 3137. Vienna: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2014. Languages are wealth: The Sprachbund as linguistic capital. In Lionnet, Florian, Carpenter, Kayla, David, Oana, Stark, Tammy, Wauters, Vivian and Sheil, Christine (eds), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. and Joseph, Brian D., 2014. Lessons from Judezmo about the Balkan sprachbund and contact linguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 226: 323. Special issue on Jewish Language Contact, edited by Zuckermann, Ghil’ad.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. and Joseph, Brian D., in press a. Non-nominative and depersonalized subjects in the Balkans: Areality vs. genealogy. In Barðdal, Jóhanna, Carey, Stephen Mark, Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Pat-El, Na’ama (eds), Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects within and across Languages and Language Families: The Reykjavík–Eyjafjallajökull Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. and Joseph, Brian D., in press b. The Balkan Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gil, David, 2011. Obligatory vs. optional tense-aspect-mood marking. Paper presented at ICHL 20 (20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics), Osaka, 28 July 2011.Google Scholar
Gołąb, Zbigniew, 1976. On the mechanism of Slavic–Rumanian linguistic interference in the Balkans. In Butler, Thomas (ed.), Bulgaria, Past and Present: Studies in History, Literature, Economics, Music, Sociology, Folklore and Linguistics, pp. 296309. Columbus, OH: AAASS.Google Scholar
Gołąb, Zbigniew, 1984. The Arumanian Dialect of Kruševo in SR Macedonia SFR Yugoslavia. Skopje: MANU.Google Scholar
Grannes, Alf, Hauge, Kjetil Rå and Süleymenoğlu, Hayriye, 2002. A Dictionary of Turkisms in Bulgarian. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Robert, 2000. The dialects of Macedonia and Montenegro: Random linguistic parallels or evidence of a sprachbund? Južnoslovenski Filolog 56: 295300.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. and Wilson, R., 1971. Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan / Dravidian border in India. In Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, pp. 151167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P., 1977. On some questions of areal linguistics. In Whistler, Kenneth, Van Valin, Robert D., Chiarello, Chris, Jaeger, Jeri J., Petruck, Miriam, Thompson, Henry, Javkin, Ronya and Woodbury, Anthony (eds), Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 279282. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P., 1989. Yugoslavia crossroads of Sprachbünde. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 25 (1): 4447.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, 1998. How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20 (3): 271287.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Language Typology and Language Universals, vol. 2, pp. 14921551. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar, 1966. Semicommunication: The language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry 36: 280297.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey, 1984. Language contact and language change. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 367384.Google Scholar
Ilievski, Petar, 1972. Kon interpretacijata na modelot na udvoeniot objekt vo makedonskiot jazik. In Godišen zbornik, Filozofski fakultet na Univerzitetot Skopje, pp. 205220. Reprinted in Ilievski, 1988, pp. 167182.Google Scholar
Ilievski, Petar, 1988 [1973]. Balkanološki Lingvistički Studii. Skopje: Institut za makedonski Jazik.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, 1931/1971. Harakteristike evrazijskogo jazykovogo sojuza [Characteristics of the Eurasian sprachbund]. In Selected Writings, second edition, vol. 1, pp. 143201. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., 1983. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive: A Study in Areal, General, and Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reissued in paperback, 2009.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian, 1987. A fresh look at the Balkan sprachbund: Some observations on H. W. Schaller’s Die Balkansprachen. Mediterranean Language Review 3: 105114.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., 2000a. Textual authenticity: Evidence from Medieval Greek. In Herring, Susan C., van Reenen, Pieter and Schøsler, Lene (eds), Textual Parameters in Older Languages, pp. 309329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., 2000b. Processes of spread for syntactic constructions in the Balkans. In Tzitzilis, Christos and Symeonidis, Charalambos (eds), Balkan Linguistik: Synchronie und Diachronie, pp. 139150. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., 2001a. Review of R. M. W. Dixon, The Rise and Fall of Languages. Journal of Linguistics 37: 180186.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., 2001b. Is Balkan comparative syntax possible? In Rivero, Maria L. and Ralli, Angela (eds), Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, pp. 1743. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., 2003. The Balkan languages. In Frawley, William (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, second edition, pp. 194196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., 2010. Language contact in the Balkans. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 618633. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. and Wallace, Rex E., 1987. Latin sum / Oscan súm, sim, esum. American Journal of Philology 108: 675693.Google Scholar
Kodov, Hr., 1935. Ezikăt na trakijskite bălgari [The Language of the Thracian Bulgarians]. Sofia: Trakijskijăt naučen institut.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard, 1998. General preface. In van der Auwera, Johan (ed.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, pp. vvii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kopitar, Jernej, 1829. Albanische, walachische und bulgarische Sprache. Jahrbücher der Literatur 46: 59106.Google Scholar
Labov, William, 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83 (2): 344387.Google Scholar
Leake, William Martin, 1814. Researches in Greece. London: John Booth.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko, 2000. Linguistic Balkanization: Contact-induced change by mutual reinforcement. In Gilbers, Dicky, Nerbonne, John and Schaeken, Jos (eds), Languages in Contact, pp. 231246. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin, 1976. South Asia as a Linguistic Area. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin, 2001. The definition and significance of linguistic areas: Methods, pitfalls, and possibilities (with special reference to the validity of South Asia as a linguistic area). In Bhaskararao, P. and Subbarao, K. (eds), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001, pp. 205268. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, 2004. Romacilikanes: The Romani dialect of Parakalamos. Romani Studies 14 (1): 59109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklosich, Franz, 1861. Die slavischen Elemente im Rumunischen. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse 12: 170.Google Scholar
Mladenov, Stefan, 1939. Bălgarskijat ezik v svetlinata na balkanistika. Godišnik na Sofijskija Universitet, Istor.-filol. fakultet, 35.13.1ff.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko, 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko, 2004. Language birth and death. Annual Review of Anthropology 33: 201222.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1997. Modeling ancient population structures and movements in linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 359284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuckols, Mark, 2000. Examination of the case for a Central European Sprachbund of Czech, German, Hungarian and Slovak. MA thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Obolensky, Dimitri, 1971. The Byzantine Commonwealth. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela, 2013. The Grammar of Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, Norbert, 1994. Grundzüge der Balkanologie: Ein Schritt in die Eurolinguistik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Reiter, Norbert, 1999. Von der Balkanologie zur Eurolinguistik. In Hinrichs, Uwe (ed.), Handbuch der Südosteuropa–Linguistik, pp. 1926. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Ringe, Donald A., 1992. On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 82 (1): 1110.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm, 2001. Contact-induced language change in north-west Melanesia. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance, pp. 134166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandfeld, Kristian, 1930. Linguistique balkanique. Paris: Klinksieck.Google Scholar
Sawicka, Irena, 1997. The Balkan Sprachbund in the Light of Phonetic Features. Toruń: Energeia.Google Scholar
Schaller, Helmut W., 1975. Die Balkansprachen: Eine Einführung in die Balkanphilologie. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Schleicher, August, 1850. Die Sprachen Europas in systematischer Übersicht. Bonn: König.Google Scholar
Seliščev, A., 1925. Des traits linguistiques communs aux langues balkaniques: Un balkanisme ancien en bulgare. Révue des Études Slaves 5: 3857.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel, 1976. An Areal-Typological Study of American Indian Languages North of Mexico. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Solta, Georg R., 1980. Einführung in die Balkanlinguistik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Substrats und des Balkanlateinischen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Steinke, Klaus, 1999. Zur theoretischen Grundlegung der Südosteuropa-Linguistik. In Hinrichs, Uwe (ed.), Handbuch der Südosteuropa-Linguistik, pp. 6790. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, 2006. Europe as a linguistic area. In Brown, Keith et al. (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. IV, pp. 278295. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G., 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence, 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thumb, Albert, 1895. Handbuch der neugriechischen Volkssprache: Grammatik, Texte, Glossar. Strasbourg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert Lawrence, 1996. Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S., 1923. Vavilonskaja bašnja i smešenie jazykov. [The tower of Babel and the confusion of languages]. Evrazijskij vremennik 3: 107124.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S., 1930. Proposition 16. In de Boer, Cornelis, van Ginneken, Jacobus and van Hamel, Anton G. (eds), Actes du Premier Congrès International des Linguistes à La Haye, du 10–15 Avril 1928, pp. 1718. Leiden, the Netherlands: A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Tuite, Kevin, 1999. The myth of the Caucasian sprachbund: The case of ergativity. Lingua 108: 126.Google Scholar
Vermeer, Willem, 1992. Serbs and Albanians in Yugoslavia. Yearbook of European Studies 5: 101124.Google Scholar
Vinožito, , 2006. Bukvar/Anagnōstiko [‘Primer’ Macedonian/Greek]. Thessaloniki: Batavia.Google Scholar
WALS, 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures, edited by Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, Paul, 1981. Jewish interlinguistics: Facts and conceptual framework. Language 57: 99149.Google Scholar
Whitney, William D., 1868. Language and the Study of Language: Twelve Lectures on the Principles of Linguistic Science. New York: C. Scribner & Co.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×